Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Open Access

Turning a fasthug [1] into low flat hugs could improve compliance with daily care bundles on the general intensive care unit: a preliminary audit

  • M Brooke1 and
  • B Murthy2
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20153(Suppl 1):A145

https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A145

Published: 1 October 2015

Introduction

Over recent years, Intensive Care Medicine has recognised the benefit of implementing checklists to augment strategies for improving patient safety[2]. One such care bundle checklist is the FASTHUG mnemonic (Feeding; Analgesia; Sedation; Thromboprophylaxis; Head up positioning; Ulcer Protection and Glucose levels)[1]. In our ICU a variation of the mnemonic has evolved, initially into 'FLATHUGS', and more recently into 'FLATHUGS VC', where additional care bundle components include L: invasive vascular L ines; C: C hlorhexidine mouth care; V: lung protective V entilation.

Objectives

This clinical audit examines (i) compliance with a locally adapted version of the FASTHUG[1] mnemonic, and (ii)suggests an updated version and template to improve its clinical utility.

Methods

A random convenience sample of medical notes from 92 separate patient day reviews over a 4 week period were analysed for documented versions of FLATHUGS VC. Data was collected from all patients with an ICU stay >24 hours, and any actions raised during the documentation of FLATHUGS were checked for completion within that same 24 hour period.

Results

In our unit, a basic 'FLATHUGS' package was completed in 81.5% of cases. The two most recently introduced components in addition to FLATHUGS (lung protective ventilation; and Chlorhexidine mouth care) were documented in 38% and 3.3% of cases respectively (Table 1). In addition, we found there were inconsistencies in the detail of what was recorded under each heading. Common examples included: (i) recording either the type of sedation, or the level of sedation (RASS Score); (ii) date of IV line insertion or anticipated date of IV line replacement.

Conclusions

There is currently an inconsistent approach amongst our ICU physicians in their application of the ´FASTHUGS VC´ care bundle, and we feel it is conceivable that this situation may be partially attributable to degradation of the original mnemonic. Although FASTHUG is an excellent mnemonic for a basic care bundle, we suggest it could be further improved by amending it to 'LOW FLAT HUGS', which includes four additional elements to those described by Vincent[1] in the original version (Lung protective ventilation; Oral hygiene of intubated patients; Weight change; Line change with date). To help embed these proposed changes and improve compliance a template sticker (Figure 1) may prove useful, and further evaluation after a period of implementation is recommended.
Figure 1

LOW FLAT HUGS Template.

Table 1

Completion of FLATHUGS (and variant).

 

Patient Day Reviews

Percentage Completion

Total

92

 

´FLATHUGS´ completed

75

81.5%

´FLATHUGS´ attempted but not completed

14

15%

´FLATHUGS´ omitted

3

3.3%

´FLATHUGS V´

35

38%

´FLATHUGS VC´

3

3.3%

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Warwick, Medical Teaching Centre
(2)
University Hospital Coventry and Warwick, Dept of Anaesthesia

References

  1. Vincent JL: Give your patient a fast hug (at least) once a Day. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33 (6): 1225-9. JunPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Conroy KM, et al: Validating a process-of-care checklist for intensive care units. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013, 41 (3): 342-8. MayPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brooke et al.; 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement