Skip to main content

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

What we say to families of intensive care unit patients - do they understand?

Introduction

Effective communication between physicians, nurses and the patient’s representatives in intensive care unit (ICU) is a vital component of quality of care.

Objectives

To evaluate the communication between ICU patient’s representatives and caregivers and identify factors associated with poor comprehension using a protocol previously described [[1]].

Methods

Prospective observational study running from 15 October 2014 to 15 March 2015. Included all patients who stayed for more than 2 days and had at least one visit in the first 5 days of ICU stay. The investigators applied three questionnaires: the representative (a relative or a friend that was designated by the patient or by the family and that was present in the first physician-family meeting); the physician that met the family at the admission; the nurse who cared the patient for more than 2 days.

Results

Of the 207 patients admitted in this period, 135 stayed more than 2 days in the ICU. Of these, we were able to enroll the family in 63 of them (47%). Forty-five patients (71%) had more than 50 years, 52% were male, 71% were married, 84% were Portuguese and 78% had comorbidities. Median SAPS II was 47 and median ICU length of stay was 11 days. Main reasons for ICU admission were shock (35%), respiratory infection with acute respiratory failure (26%) and multiple trauma (13%). Thirty-eight of the representatives (60%) were female, 86% were Portuguese, 38% were sons, 76% were employed and 24% had only primary school education. The first physician-family meeting duration was between 10 and 20 minutes in 62% and occurred in a room used only for this purpose in 43%. Failure to comprehend the diagnosis, prognosis or treatment was noted in 39 representatives (62%); 25% of the representatives did not understand the diagnosis, 49% did not understand the treatment and 37% did not understand the prognosis. Factors significantly associated with poor comprehension were patient comorbidities, age of the representative more than 50 years and first physician-family meeting duration less than 10 minutes. Also, lower number of daily visits and Portuguese nationality, although not reaching statistical significance, exhibited a trend to be associated with poor comprehension.

Conclusions

In this study poor comprehension was found in 62% of the representatives, which is in line with previous studies [[1]]. A high number of comorbidities, first physician-family meeting duration less than 10min, representatives older than 50 years, were the factors significantly associated to poor comprehension. This study draws our attention to the need to improve communication with the families and to try to identify patients and families at high risk of poor comprehension.

References

  1. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, et al: Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28 (8): 3044-3049. 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbosa, S., Ilchenko, A., Carmo, A. et al. What we say to families of intensive care unit patients - do they understand?. ICMx 3 (Suppl 1), A471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A471

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A471

Keywords