Open Access

Attenuated platelet aggregation in patients with septic shock is independent from the activity state of myosin light chain phosphorylation or a reduction in Rho kinase-dependent inhibition of myosin light chain phosphatase

  • Benjamin AJ Reddi1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Samantha M Iannella3,
  • Stephanie N O’Connor1, 3,
  • Adam M Deane1, 3,
  • Scott R Willoughby4 and
  • David P Wilson2
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20153:5

DOI: 10.1186/s40635-014-0037-7

Received: 11 September 2014

Accepted: 23 December 2014

Published: 12 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Impaired coagulation contributes to the morbidity and mortality associated with septic shock. Whether abnormal platelet contraction adds to the bleeding tendency is unknown. Platelets contract when Ca2+-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates Ser19 of myosin light chain (MLC20), promoting actin-myosin cross-bridge cycling. Contraction is opposed when myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) dephosphorylates MLC20. It is thought that Rho kinase (ROK) inhibits MLCP by phosphorylating Thr855 of the regulatory subunit MYPT, favouring platelet contraction. This study tested the hypotheses that in septic shock, (i) platelet function is inversely correlated with illness severity and (ii) ROK-dependent MLCP inhibition and myosin light chain phosphorylation are reduced.

Methods

Blood was sampled from non-septic shock patients and patients in the first 24 h of septic shock. Platelet function was assessed using whole blood impedance aggregation induced by 1) ADP (1.6 and 6.5 μM), 2) thrombin receptor-activating protein (TRAP; 32 μM), 3) arachidonic acid (500 μM) and 4) collagen (3.2 μg/ml). Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was measured in the presence of the ROK inhibitor Y27632. Illness severity was evaluated using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores. Western blot analysis of [Ser19]MLC20 and [Thr855]MYPT phosphorylation quantified activation and inhibition of platelet MLC20 and MLCP, respectively. Data were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Agonist-induced aggregation was attenuated in septic shock patients (n = 22 to 34; p < 0.05). Aggregation correlated inversely with SOFA and APACHE II scores (n = 34; p < 0.05). Thr855 phosphorylation of MYPT from unstimulated platelets was not decreased in patients with septic shock (n = 22 to 24). Both septic shock and ROK inhibition attenuated arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation independent of changes in [Ser19]MLC20 and [Thr855]MYPT phosphorylation (n = 14).

Conclusions

Impairment of whole blood aggregation in patients within the first 24 h of septic shock was correlated with SOFA and APACHE II scores. Attenuated aggregation was independent of molecular evidence of diminished platelet contraction or reduced ROK inhibition of MLCP. Efforts to restore platelet function in septic shock should therefore focus on platelet adhesion and degranulation.

Keywords

Platelets Sepsis Shock Aggregation Rho kinase Myosin phosphatase Whole blood impedance aggregometry Illness severity score

Background

Septic shock is fatal in over 20% of cases in the developed world [1,2]. Coagulation abnormalities are common in septic shock, ranging from mild thrombocytopaenia to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Whilst thrombocytopaenia is established as occurring frequently and of prognostic importance in sepsis [3], the nature of qualitative changes in platelet function remains incompletely understood.

Analysis of platelet function in the context of infection and sepsis has yielded equivocal data depending on the experimental paradigm. When platelets isolated from healthy volunteers are exposed to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [4-7] or lipoteichoic acid (LTA) [8], or sepsis-associated cytokines [9], aggregation has been shown to be enhanced, inhibited or unchanged. In contrast, platelets isolated from septic shock patients show a profound and consistent reduction in adhesion and aggregation response to a range of agonists [10-13], despite biochemical evidence of increased platelet activity [14,15]. This suggests an intrinsic abnormality of a common effector pathway - adhesion, secretion or contraction - that persists even when the platelet is removed from the septic milieu. Considerable effort has investigated the role of abnormal platelet adhesion; however, the integrity of platelet contraction has not been specifically assessed in the context of sepsis or septic shock.

Activated platelets contract with similar force to muscle - by making the clot more rigid and adherent, the platelet maintains clot shape and promotes uniform retraction [16]. Platelet contraction is determined by two opposing enzymatic processes (illustrated in Figure 1): (i) myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates Ser19 of myosin regulatory light chain (MLC20) [17,18] to promote actin-myosin cross-bridge cycling and contraction [19]; (ii) myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) dephosphorylates [Ser19]MLC20, uncoupling actin and myosin and favouring relaxation [20]. MLCK is stimulated by increased cytosolic Ca2+ derived either from the extracellular space [21] or from intracellular Ca2+ stores [22]. MLCP has been reported to be regulated by two mechanisms: (i) RhoA activates Rho kinase (ROK) [23] which inhibits MLCP by phosphorylating [Thr855]MYPT, the regulatory subunit of MLCP [24-26]. (ii) Activated PKC phosphorylates [Thr38]CPI-17 which directly and specifically inhibits MLCP [24,27-29]. By inhibiting MLCP, both RhoA/ROK and PKC/CPI-17 activities favour contraction, potentially explaining how platelets can be stimulated to change shape in the absence of significant changes in cytosolic [Ca2+]in [30,31] and why aggregation is attenuated in platelets lacking the Gα13 (RhoA activating) subunit [32].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig1_HTML.gif
Figure 1

Platelet aggregation requires contraction, adhesion and secretion. ROK promotes platelet aggregation independent of MLCP inhibition. Platelet contraction requires Ser19 myosin light chain (MLC20) phosphorylation by Ca2+:calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). Agonists such as arachidonic acid initiate platelet contraction by augmenting [Ca2+]cyt derived from both the extracellular fluid via transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and intracellular dense tubular system stores. Contraction is opposed when MLC20 is dephosphorylated by myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP). It is proposed that MLCP is regulated by two mechanisms: (i) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) bearing the Gα13 subunit activate membrane-bound RhoA, which activates Rho kinase (ROK) [23]; ROK is thought to inhibit MLCP by phosphorylating Thr855 on MYPT, the regulatory subunit of MLCP [24-26] (dashed line). (ii) PKC-dependent CPI-17 directly inhibits MLCP [24,27-29] (not shown). By inhibiting MLCP, both ROK and CPI-17 favour contraction independent of the prevailing [Ca2+]. Other than disinhibiting MLCP, there are other mechanisms by which ROK inhibition might oppose platelet aggregation: ROK is also involved in vesicle trafficking and degranulation, pseudopodium formation, stabilisation of platelet-fibrin binding and actin polymerisation.

Previous studies have evaluated aggregation of platelets from patients with sepsis; however, our analysis of platelet function was restricted to patients with septic shock. Since septic shock is characterised by uncontrolled vasodilation and recognising that vascular smooth muscle and platelets may share common contractile signalling pathways [33,34], we explored whether a common mechanism might compromise both vascular smooth muscle contraction and platelet contraction. Contractile dysfunction in vascular smooth muscle has been associated with increased MLCP activity in animal models of sepsis. In particular, inhibitory [Thr855] phosphorylation of MYPT (the target of RhoA/ROK) is reduced in both an endotoxaemic rat model [35] and a caecal ligation and puncture mouse model [36].

Both whole blood impedance aggregometry and Western blot analysis of P-[Ser19]MLC20 and the ROK substrate P-[Thr855]-MYPT were performed to test the following hypotheses: 1) whole blood aggregation of platelets is attenuated in patients with septic shock, 2) platelet aggregation in septic shock patients correlates with illness severity indexed by the SOFA and APACHE II scores, and 3) platelet aggregation in septic shock patients is associated with reduced (i) [Ser19]MLC20 phosphorylation and (ii) RhoA/ROK-mediated inhibition (Thr855 phosphorylation) of myofilament-associated MLCP.

The integrity of platelet contraction and its potential as a therapeutic target is an important gap in our understanding of the pathogenesis of platelet dysfunction in human septic shock.

Methods

Patients

This prospective observational study was approved by the research ethics committees of the University of Adelaide and the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Consecutively identified patients aged 18 to 80 years admitted into either the elective surgery unit (controls) or specifically the intensive care unit of the Royal Adelaide Hospital on randomly allocated sampling days between September 2012 and May 2013 meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled into the study; 40 patients were recruited with acute (<24 h) septic shock, and 40 patients were recruited into the non-septic shock control group. The diagnosis of septic shock was defined as the presence of two or more of the following: (i) temp >38°C or <36°C, (ii) heart rate >90 bpm, (iii) respiratory rate >20 or PaCO2 <32 mmHg, (iv) leucocyte count >12,000 or <4,000/mm3 or >10% bands, plus suspected or proven source of infection, organ dysfunction attributable to sepsis and hypotension/requirement for vasopressor support >1 h despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Patients were managed according to current international guidelines [37]. These diagnostic criteria were absent in control patients who were post-operative elective surgical patients in whom an indwelling arterial catheter had been sited for routine intra-operative monitoring. Because agonist-induced platelet aggregation has been shown to be enhanced beyond 24 h after surgery [38], samples were drawn a maximum of 8 to 12 h post surgery. Exclusion criteria included co-incident malignancy, pre-existing platelet abnormality, patients receiving anti-platelet medications or platelet transfusions over the last 28 days, patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or admission within the last 72 h with severe trauma. Patients with platelet count <150,000/μl (measured max 4 h before sampling or at the time of sampling) were excluded from functional analysis.

Blood samples were taken and demographic and clinical data were recorded from all patients enrolled in the study after written informed consent was acquired from patients or their next of kin.

Illness severity

Illness severity was evaluated using two different composite scoring tools: the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores. The former incorporates respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, liver, renal and coagulation (including platelet count) parameters [39]; the latter incorporates age, previous health status and 12 acute cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, haematological and renal parameters (notably platelet count is not included) [40].

Sample preparation

A volume of 12 ml of blood was drawn from an existing arterial line into 3.2% sodium citrate tubes (VACUETTE®, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). Samples were partitioned to be analysed either by whole blood impedance aggregometry or to undergo protein extraction for Western blot analysis of the phosphorylation state of [Ser19]-MLC20 and [Thr855]-MYPT.

Platelet aggregation

Whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate® aggregometer, Dynabyte, Munich, Germany) was performed within 1 h of blood collection according to the manufacturer's instruction. Samples were not normalised by platelet concentration since Multiplate whole blood impedance aggregometry by the Multiplate system has been shown to be relatively independent of platelet concentration when the count is >150,000/μl [41]. Citrated whole blood (300 μl) was diluted with physiological saline (300 μl; 37°C) followed by incubation for 3 min at 37°C. Following administration of agonists, platelet aggregation (measured in aggregation units (AU)) was recorded for 6 min. Aggregation recording was repeated if the area under the curve detected by each of the two electrodes varied more than 20% from the mean. As a further control to exclude the influence of platelet count on aggregation response, results of aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 6.5 μM) and arachidonic acid (500 μM) were plotted against platelet count for samples from both septic shock and non-septic shock patients; no correlation was found (n = 34, p > 0.05; data not shown).

In order to ascertain whether there was a generalised impairment of platelet aggregation that was consistent with a reduction in [Ser19]MLC20 and [Thr855]MYPT phosphorylation-dependent contractility, the aggregation response to agonists was measured: thrombin receptor-activating protein (TRAP; 32 μM) and arachidonic acid (500 μM), both associated with RhoA/ROK-mediated inhibition of MLCP, and ADP (1.6 and 6.5 μM) and collagen (3.2 μg/ml), which are RhoA/ROK independent [aggregation agonists purchased were sourced from Multiplate®] [42].

In order to identify whether platelet aggregation was impaired by inhibition of the RhoA/Rho kinase pathway, the aggregation response to arachidonic acid was also measured in the presence or absence of 20 min of incubation with the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 (1 μM) [(1R,4r)-4-((R)-1-aminoethyl)-N-(pyridin-4-yl)cyclohexanecarboxamide, Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp., San Diego, CA, USA] and Y27632 alone. Additional controls included aggregation responses of platelets incubated in buffer alone or Y27632 alone.

Western blot analysis

To identify whether the reduction in aggregation of platelets from patients suffering from septic shock was associated with reduced activity of the contractile proteins, Western blot analyses were used to measure the state of MLC20 phosphorylation (P-[Ser19]MLC20) in 1) unstimulated platelets, 2) arachidonic acid-stimulated platelets, 3) arachidonic acid-stimulated platelets pre-incubated with Y27632 for 20 min and 4) platelets incubated with Y27632 only. To address whether the P-[Ser19]-MLC20 was associated with altered RhoA/ROK-dependent Ca2+ sensitivity, the Thr-855 phosphorylation state of the MYPT P-[Thr855]MYPT targeting subunit of MLCP was directly measured in the same platelets. Results were compared for platelets from both non-septic and septic shock patients.

Since no increase in Thr855 phosphorylation of platelet MYPT has been specifically identified in the literature, we used a comparison of unstimulated and TxA2 receptor agonist (U46619)-stimulated rat mesenteric artery as a positive control [24]; rat caudal artery samples were transferred with the platelet samples.

Briefly, platelet-rich plasma was isolated by centrifuging 2 ml of whole blood at 800 rpm (in an Eppendorf microfuge) for 12 min and decanted. The platelet-rich plasma was then stimulated with arachidonic acid (500 μM), Y27632 (1 μM) or both before being centrifuged at 2,600 rpm for 18 min to yield a platelet-rich pellet. The plasma was discarded and the platelet-rich pellet washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline. Enzymatic activity in platelets was stopped by incubating for 30 s in a solution of ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA)/acetone. The precipitated protein was rinsed three times with ice-cold acetone to remove residual TCA.

A washed platelet-rich pellet from 2 ml of whole blood was solubilised in 200 μl glycerol-free sample buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1% (w/v) SDS, 1× cOmplete™ protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 100 μM di-isopropylfluorophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, Australia), 10 mM DTT, 20% (w/v) sucrose and 0.1% (w/v) bromophenol blue. Samples were heated to 95°C for 5 min and then vortex mixed for 90 s. Samples were centrifuged in a microfuge at 12,000 rpm for 4 min to remove insoluble particulates prior to SDS/PAGE using Bio-Rad 4–15% Criterion TGX precast gels run in a Bio-Rad Criterion unit at 200 V for 60 min (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Merck and Co., Macquarie Park, Australia) and scanned using the LI-COR Odyssey system (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE, USA) to quantify the total extracted protein and allow normalisation of total protein content in the samples. Following normalisation of extracted protein content in samples, SDS/PAGE was repeated and proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto 0.22 μm nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad) (100 V for 30 min) in transfer buffer containing 25 mM Tris/HCl, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol and 0.1% (w/v) SDS for MYPT and without SDS for MLC20. Following protein transfer to nitrocellulose, non-specific binding sites were blocked with a solution containing 50% LI-COR Odyssey™ blocking buffer/50% Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) for 60 min, followed by incubation with TBS plus 0.05 Tween-20 (TBS-T) containing either mouse anti-MYPT1 (1:1,000) [made in-house [24]], rabbit anti-P-[Thr855]MYPT1 (1:1,000) [Upstate/Millipore USA, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA], mouse anti-MLC20 [Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA] or mouse anti-P-[Ser19]MLC20 (1:1,000). The nitrocellulose was washed three times in TBS-T and incubated in TBS-T with a 1 to 10,000 dilution of biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody [Pierce/Thermo Scientific Australia, Scoresby, Australia] for 60 min before another three washes with TBS-T. The nitrocellulose was then incubated for 60 min in TBS-T with a 1 to 10,000 dilution of streptavidin conjugated to the 800-nm DyLight fluorochrome [Pierce/Thermo Scientific Australia]. Fluorescence was detected and quantified using the LI-COR Odyssey™ system. All samples were transferred, incubated and scanned together to ensure identical analysis conditions between septic shock and non-septic shock patients and between different platelet treatments. All samples used in the analysis were within the linear range of detection.

Data analysis

Western blot data was expressed as a ratio of total P-[Thr855]/total MYPT and total P[Ser19]-MLC20/total MLC20. Sample size was determined by a power analysis based upon data derived from Western blot analysis of MYPT phosphorylation in vascular smooth muscle [24]. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v. 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data were tested with the D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. All results are presented as the mean ± SEM where n indicates the number of independent experiments for each treatment. For parametric and non-parametric data, unpaired Student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively, were used to compare data between groups. For parametric and non-parametric data, paired Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test, respectively, were used to compare within-patient agonist/inhibitor responses; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from control. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient was calculated for the relationships between (i) noradrenaline dose and platelet aggregation response to arachidonic acid and ADP, (ii) noradrenaline dose required to achieve the desired mean arterial pressure and Thr[855] phosphorylation state of MYPT, (iii) SOFA and APACHE II scores and aggregation responses to arachidonic acid and ADP and (iv) SOFA and APACHE II scores and the Thr[855] phosphorylation state of MYPT. A correlation between TRAP/collagen-induced platelet aggregation and illness severity scores was not performed as the number of samples was too small. Fisher's test was used to analyse the mortality difference between the groups. A mixed-effects regression analysis was undertaken (Stata/MP 13.1) to identify significant interactions between variables and to estimate the overall effect of septic shock on platelet aggregation.

Results

Patients with septic shock (37) and non-septic shock controls (40) were recruited and were well matched for demographic characteristics; clinical status at the time of blood sampling was recorded and represented in Table 1 with clinical outcome data. The mean platelet count was in the normal range for both septic shock (mean 278; SEM 24.27) and non-septic shock (mean 261; SEM 12.44) patients, consistent with the early stage of septic shock at which whole blood was acquired [43]. Hospital and ICU mortality was higher (p < 0.01) in septic shock patients.
Table 1

Clinical status at the time of blood sampling

 

Septic shock

Non-septic shock

Number

37

40

Age

60.54 ± 13.55

60.5 ± 14.52

Female, n (%)

26 (70)

27 (68)

Smoker, n (%)

12 (32)

8 (20)

APACHE II scorea

24.14 (1.19)

NA

SOFA scoreb

9.5 (0.47)

NA

Proven infection, n (%)

26 (70)

NA

 Gram-positive

8

NA

 Gram-negative

10

NA

 Mixed

5

NA

 Fungal

3

NA

Mean catecholamine dose (μg/min)

18.7 (2.03)

NA

Platelet count (109/l)

278 (24.3)

261 (12.4)

ICU mortality (%)

10 (27)

0

Hospital mortality, n (%)

16 (43)

2 (5)

Unless otherwise stated, values indicate mean and SEM; p > 0.05 for all comparisons except ICU and hospital mortality, where p < 0.01. aAcute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, a higher value indicates greater admission illness severity. bSequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more severe organ dysfunction. NA, non-applicable.

Platelet aggregation in response to each agonist was significantly attenuated in patients with septic shock. Compared with platelets from non-septic shock patients, platelets from patients with septic shock demonstrated attenuated whole blood impedance aggregation in response to low-dose ADP (74.3 ± 8.7 vs. 51.2 ± 6.7), high-dose ADP (78.1 ± 7.5 vs. 55.5 ± 6.8), thrombin receptor-activating protein (92.4 ± 6.8 vs. 69.3 ± 9.4) and collagen (108.8 ± 9.4 vs. 83.3 ± 11.1) (n = 16 to 20 per patient group, p < 0.05) (Figure 2). Regression analysis across agonists was used to model the overall effect of septic shock on aggregation; the overall estimate of the impact of septic shock on aggregation is −32% (−7.8, −55.7, p < 0.05).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig2_HTML.gif
Figure 2

Whole blood platelet aggregation is reduced in patients with septic shock. Whole blood platelet aggregation in response to ADP, thrombin receptor-activating protein (TRAP) and collagen was attenuated in patients suffering from septic shock (red bar) vs. non-septic shock controls (blue bar). (n = 16 to 20 per patient group, *p < 0.05).

Platelet aggregation was strongly promoted by arachidonic acid. Arachidonic acid-mediated platelet aggregation was attenuated in whole blood (i) taken from patients with septic shock and (ii) incubated with the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632.

Arachidonic acid (500 μM)-mediated platelet aggregation was attenuated in whole blood taken from patients with septic shock (76.9 ± 6.4 vs. 57.1 ± 7.5; n = 26 to 33, p < 0.05). To illustrate the proof of principle that ROK inhibition can attenuate platelet function, platelets were incubated for 20 min with the ROK inhibitor Y27632. Incubation with Y27632 significantly attenuated arachidonic acid-mediated aggregation in whole blood from both non-septic shock and septic shock patients (35.3.0 ± 15.4 and 31.3 ± 11.3; n = 10 to 12, p < 0.05.) In the presence of Y27632, arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was not significantly different from aggregation of unstimulated platelets (13.5 ± 7.1 vs. 15.03 ± 5.0 (non-septic shock) and 11.7 ± 4.8 vs. 11.4 ± 3.6 (septic shock); n = 10 to 12) (Figure 3). Although regression modelling identified a positive interaction between ROK inhibition and septic shock supporting that the effect of ROK inhibition is lessened in the presence of septic shock, this was non-significant (p = 0.312).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig3_HTML.gif
Figure 3

Arachidonic acid-dependent platelet aggregation was reduced in patients with septic shock. Platelet number was not significantly different between septic shock and non-septic shock patients; however, arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was reduced in platelets derived from septic shock patients (red bar) compared with non-septic shock controls (blue bar) (n = 26 to 33 per patient group, p < 0.05). Incubation for 20 min with the ROK inhibitor Y27632 significantly attenuated arachidonic acid-mediated platelet aggregation in whole blood from both septic shock and non-septic shock patients. Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation in the presence of Y27632 was not significantly different from aggregation of unstimulated platelets. (n = 10 to 12 per patient group, * and † p < 0.05).

The regression analysis was repeated controlling for platelet count, the result of which was consistent with our more simplified analysis and did not change our inference with respect to the effect of septic shock or ROK inhibition, namely the conclusion that septic shock was associated with a reduction in platelet aggregation in response to each of four agonists.

Poor platelet aggregation responses were associated with high SOFA and APACHE II scores. Amongst patients with septic shock, the aggregation response to both ADP (6.5 μM) and arachidonic acid (500 μM) was inversely correlated with their SOFA score (n = 26, r = −0.51 and −0.36, respectively, p < 0.05; Figure 4A,B). Although the SOFA score includes platelet count, there was no correlation between platelet count and SOFA score in septic shock patients in this study and platelet count was similar in both septic shock and non-septic shock patients (Table 1). Furthermore, ADP- and arachidonic acid-induced aggregation correlated inversely with the SOFA score even when coagulation parameters were excluded (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ADP- and arachidonic acid-induced aggregation of platelets from septic shock patients was also inversely correlated with their APACHE II score (n = 26, r =−0.44 and −0.47, respectively, p < 0.05; Figure 4C,D); the APACHE II calculation does not include platelet count. Platelet aggregation was not significantly correlated with noradrenaline dose or mean arterial blood pressure (data not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig4_HTML.gif
Figure 4

Platelet aggregation is inversely correlated with illness severity. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores at the time of blood sampling and platelet aggregation induced by (A, C) ADP (r = −0.51 and −0.36) and (B, D) arachidonic acid (r = −0.41 and −0.47) in whole blood taken from patients with septic shock (n = 26). Note: platelet concentration was not significantly lower in the septic shock patients, and there was no correlation between platelet count and either SOFA or APACHE II score (p > 0.05).

Contraction-associated P-[Ser19]MLC20 was increased in platelets stimulated with arachidonic acid; this increase was not attenuated in platelets from septic shock patients or by pre-incubation with Y27632.

Baseline P-[Ser19]MLC20 in unstimulated platelets was not different in platelets from patients with or without septic shock (0.84 ± 0.27 vs. 0.57 ± 0.14). Following stimulation with arachidonic acid, P-[Ser19]MLC20 was significantly higher in platelets from both non-septic shock and septic shock patients (2.0 ± 0.49 and 1.8 ± 0.53; p < 0.05), but the increase was not significantly different between non-septic shock and septic shock patients. Pre-incubation with Y27632 did not reduce the arachidonic acid-induced increase in P-[Ser19]MLC20 in platelets from either patient group (non-septic shock 1.5 ± 0.69 and septic shock 1.5 ± 0.63). The proportion of P-[Ser19]MLC20 in unstimulated platelets was not significantly reduced following pre-incubation with Y27632 (non-septic shock 0.31 ± 0.08 and septic shock 0.52 ± 0.23) (n = 14 per patient group; Figure 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig5_HTML.gif
Figure 5

Neither septic shock nor ROK inhibition reduced arachidonic acid-induced LC 20 phosphorylation. Following stimulation with arachidonic acid, Ser19 phosphorylation of LC20 was significantly increased in platelets from both septic shock (red bar) and non-septic shock control (blue bar) patients. Pre-incubation with Y27632 did not significantly attenuate the arachidonic acid-induced increase in Ser19 phosphorylation of LC20. Arachidonic acid-induced Ser19 phosphorylation of LC20 was not different in platelets derived from patients with septic shock compared to those derived from non-septic shock controls. (n = 14 to 15 per patient group, *p < 0.05).

The baseline Thr855 phosphorylation state of MYPT was not reduced in platelets taken from patients with septic shock.

The fraction of the MLCP regulatory subunit MYPT which was phosphorylated at the inhibitory Thr855 site (i.e. the proportion of MLCP in the putative RhoA/ROK-dependent inactive state) was not different in unstimulated platelets taken from either non-septic shock or septic shock patients (6.482 ± 1.32 vs. 7.658 ± 1.07; n = 22 to 24 per patient group; Figure 6). The Thr855 phosphorylation state of MYPT was not correlated with the noradrenaline dose, mean arterial pressure or SOFA/APACHE II scores (data not shown). Control experiments using rat mesenteric artery samples transferred alongside platelet samples identified that treatment with U46619 (1 μM), a mimetic of the arachidonic acid metabolite thromboxane A2, increased P[Thr855]MYPT (4.79 ± 1.27 vs. 14.71 ± 2.02) and incubation with Y-27632 (1 μM) attenuated U46619-mediated P[Thr855]MYPT.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig6_HTML.gif
Figure 6

ROK-dependent myosin phosphatase activity was unchanged in platelets isolated from patients with septic shock. (A) The proportion of the myosin phosphatase regulatory subunit (MYPT) phosphorylated at the ROK substrate site Thr855 did not differ between unstimulated platelets taken from patients with septic shock compared to those taken from non-septic shock controls (n = 22 to 24 in each patient group). (B) Rat mesenteric artery samples were transferred with platelet samples as controls. Treatment with the stable thromboxane A2 mimetic U46619 increased ROK-dependent Thr855 phosphorylation of MYPT that was attenuated with the ROK antagonist Y-27632; representative data from n = 3.

In platelets from both septic shock and non-septic shock patients, the Thr855 phosphorylation state of MYPT was not significantly different in platelets stimulated with arachidonic acid and platelets stimulated with arachidonic acid following incubation with Y27632.

There was no significant increase in the Thr855 phosphorylation state of MYPT in platelets taken from either patient group following stimulation with arachidonic acid (non-septic shock 25.64 ± 8.16 vs. 22.05 ± 7.06; septic shock 25.27 ± 6.96 vs. 25.52 ± 8.02). There was no significant difference in the Thr855 phosphorylation state of MYPT in either group following stimulation with arachidonic acid of platelets that had been incubated with Y27632 (non-septic shock 22.25 ± 5.75 vs. septic shock 18.42 ± 5.91) (n = 13 to 15; Figure 7).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40635-014-0037-7/MediaObjects/40635_2014_37_Fig7_HTML.gif
Figure 7

Thr855 MYPT phosphorylation was not significantly influenced by arachidonic acid, ROK inhibition or septic shock. The proportion of the ROK substrate MYPT phosphorylated at the inhibitory Thr855 site was not increased following stimulation with arachidonic acid and/or incubation with Y27632 and did not differ between samples from patients with septic shock (red bar) compared to samples from non-septic shock patients (blue bar) (n = 13 to 15 per patient group).

Discussion

The global impact of septic shock is profound; in 2012, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee stated that severe sepsis and septic shock affect ‘millions of people around the world, killing one in four (and often more), and is increasing in incidence’ [37]. Up to 7% of patients with septic shock experience life-threatening haemorrhage [1]; although thrombocytopaenia contributes to haemorrhage in sepsis and is an independent risk factor for poor outcome [44], the presence, impact and mechanism of qualitative platelet dysfunction are less well established. The study tested the primary hypothesis that whole blood aggregation of platelets from patients with septic shock would be attenuated and that the degree of aggregation impairment would correlate with illness severity indexed by the SOFA and APACHE II scores. The secondary hypothesis that reduced platelet aggregation would be associated with (i) reduced activation of the myosin light chain, MLC20, and (ii) reduced RhoA/ROK-mediated inhibition of myofilament-associated MLCP was also tested.

Our data add to the weight of evidence that platelet function is impaired in sepsis [10,45], identifying for the first time that specifically in human septic shock, there is a clear reduction in ADP-, thrombin receptor-activating protein-, arachidonic acid- and collagen-dependent whole blood impedance aggregation.

Platelets are activated when sub-endothelial collagen and the von Willebrand factor (vWF) are exposed and bind to their respective platelet receptors [46,47]. This triggers the activation of integrins, which bind platelets to the extracellular matrix. Platelets then enter a secretion phase, emptying α-granules and dense granules which contain soluble mediators such as ADP [48]. Activated platelets also generate and secrete thromboxane A2 (TxA2) de novo [49]. ADP, TxA2 and locally produced thrombin [50] trigger platelet contraction through heterotrimeric G proteins of the Gq and G13 families [34].

Whole blood impedance aggregometry has advantages over optical-based techniques [51] since platelets (i) remain in the same humoral and cellular milieu as in vivo, (ii) do not suffer centrifugation injury, (iii) are analysed sooner after phlebotomy and (iv) are derived from smaller blood volumes. Whole blood impedance aggregometry thus permits assessment of platelet function in as close to in vivo conditions as possible. Generalised attenuation of aggregation to different agonists using independent receptor pathways suggests an abnormality downstream of receptor and second messenger mechanisms, indicating a failure of one or more of the following: adhesion, secretion or contraction.

The reduction in agonist-dependent aggregation in patients with septic shock correlated with higher SOFA (with and without inclusion of the coagulation score) and APACHE II scores even amongst septic shock patients with relatively preserved platelet counts. The finding that platelet function provides an early index of disease severity in patients with septic shock is not surprising since platelets are directly immersed in the milieu of inflammatory mediators and bacterial products. This finding warrants further study to identify whether using whole blood impedance aggregation improves prognostic accuracy in septic shock.

Platelet aggregation and clot formation depend upon platelet shape change, drawing the discoid resting platelet into a stiffer structure whilst extending pseudopodia to facilitate adhesion and clot stability; platelet contraction is critical for maintaining the primary haemostatic plug [52]. We postulated that diminished MLC20 phosphorylation, resulting from reduced ROK-dependent inhibition of MLCP, attenuated platelet contraction and hence aggregation in sepsis.

Aggregation of platelets from both non-septic and septic shock patients was profoundly attenuated in the presence of the ROK inhibitor Y27632, demonstrating that, in principle, if septic shock were associated with impaired ROK-mediated inhibition of MLCP, this could effectively inhibit platelet aggregation. However, contrary to our hypothesis, our data show that whilst both septic shock and incubation with a ROK inhibitor were associated with reduced whole blood aggregation, in neither case was the attenuation in aggregation associated with a significant reduction in [Thr855] phosphorylation of MYPT or [Ser19] phosphorylation of MLC20, i.e. attenuation of aggregation was independent of ROK-mediated inhibition of MLCP or activation of myosin (dashed line in Figure 1). These data provide two insights: Firstly, reduced whole blood aggregation in septic shock was independent of molecular evidence of reduced actin-myosin contraction (no change in myosin LC20 phosphorylation), instead suggesting impairment of other elements of platelet function such as adhesion or granule secretion. Consistent with our finding that reduced platelet aggregation in septic shock was not a consequence of reduced ROK-mediated Thr855 phosphorylation of MYPT was the observation that aggregation was also attenuated in response to collagen and ADP, agonists thought to activate platelets independent of Gα12/13 and RhoA/ROK [34].

Secondly, treatment with the ROK inhibitor Y27632 attenuated platelet aggregation independent of significant changes in the phosphorylation state of [Thr855]MYPT and phosphorylation of MLC20. There are several alternative mechanisms by which ROK inhibition might attenuate platelet aggregation independent of changes in MLC20 phosphorylation [53], and these are illustrated in Figure 1. Specifically, ROK also (i) maintains active binding of the integrin GPIIbIIIa to fibrin and vWF [54,55], and it has been identified that activation of GPIIbIIIa is decreased in patients with sepsis [13]; (ii) mediates vesicle trafficking within platelets independent of MLCP [56-59]; (iii) is essential for TxA2- and thrombin-induced granule secretion [32,60] and (iv) modulates actin assembly and polymerisation in the dynamic regulation of microtubule coils [61-63] and formation of stress fibres [64]. It is now clear that ROK inhibition may disrupt any of these mechanisms involved in platelet aggregation without significantly reducing the proportion of phosphorylated [Thr855]MYPT and [Ser19]MLC20.

Vascular smooth muscle contraction depends on Ca2+-mediated activation of MLCK and RhoA/ROK-mediated inhibition of MLCP. Animal studies suggest that diminished contraction of vascular smooth muscle in sepsis is associated with attenuated ROK activity and disinhibition of MLCP [35,36]. Furthermore, common bacterial pathogens produce toxins capable of inhibiting RhoA/ROK-mediated inhibitory phosphorylation of MLCP [65-67] (reviewed by Somlyo and Somlyo [27]). Whilst platelets also contain ROK, actin-myosin-dependent platelet contraction does not appear to be mediated by ROK inhibition of MLCP, and septic shock-induced platelet dysfunction does not appear to be a consequence of platelet contractile dysfunction. Our data suggest that in patients with septic shock, targeted support of platelet adhesion and secretion is likely to be of more value in restoring platelet function than targeting platelet contraction.

Conclusions

Platelets in whole blood derived from patients suffering from septic shock exhibit reduced aggregation to a range of agonists, indicating an increased bleeding risk despite a normal platelet count. The reduction in aggregation correlated with illness severity scores. Therefore, reduced platelet aggregation in whole blood from patients with septic shock may be valuable as an early prognostic marker associated with poor patient outcome. Reduced platelet aggregation in patients with septic shock was independent of molecular evidence of reduced platelet contraction, i.e. [Ser19]MLC20 phosphorylation or RhoA/ROK-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation of [Thr855]MYPT. Future efforts to ameliorate coagulopathy in sepsis should consider mechanisms that include platelet adherence and secretion.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr Mark Finnis (MBiostat. Royal Adelaide Hospital ICU) for the statistical advice.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital
(2)
Molecular Physiology of Vascular Function Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide
(3)
Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide
(4)
Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide

References

  1. Sprung CL, Annane D, Keh D, Moreno R, Singer M, Freivogel K, Weiss YG, Benbenishty J, Kalenka A, Forst H, Laterre PF, Reinhart K, Cuthbertson BH, Payen D, Briegel J (2008) Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 358(2):111–124View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R (2014) Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA 311(13):1308–1316View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Strauss R, Wehler M, Mehler K, Kreutzer D, Koebnick C, Hahn EG (2002) Thrombocytopenia in patients in the medical intensive care unit: bleeding prevalence, transfusion requirements, and outcome. Crit Care Med 30(8):1765–1771View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saba HI, Saba SR, Morelli G, Hartmann RC (1984) Endotoxin-mediated inhibition of human platelet aggregation. Thromb Res 34(1):19–33View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Whitworth NH, Barradas MA, Mikhailidis DP, Dandona P (1989) An investigation into the effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on human platelets. Eur J Haematol 43(2):112–119View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Matera C, Falzarano C, Berrino L, Rossi F (1992) Effects of tetanus toxin, Salmonella typhimurium porin, and bacterial lipopolysaccharide on platelet aggregation. J Med 23(5):327–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Salden HJ, Bas BM (1994) Endotoxin binding to platelets in blood from patients with a sepsis syndrome. Clin Chem 40(8):1575–1579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sheu JR, Lee CR, Lin CH, Hsiao G, Ko WC, Chen YC, Yen MH (2000) Mechanisms involved in the antiplatelet activity of Staphylococcus aureus lipoteichoic acid in human platelets. Thromb Haemost 83(5):777–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Leytin V, Shakoor S, Mody M, Allen D, Garvey B, Freedman J (2002) Sepsis- and endotoxemia-generated cytokines do not trigger activation of human platelets. Crit Care Med 30(12):2771–2773View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Katz JN, Kolappa KP, Becker RC (2011) Beyond thrombosis: the versatile platelet in critical illness. Chest 139(3):658–668View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Woth G, Varga A, Ghosh S, Krupp M, Kiss T, Bogar L, Muhl D (2011) Platelet aggregation in severe sepsis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 31(1):6–12View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boldt J, Menges T, Wollbruck M, Sonneborn S, Hempelmann G (1994) Platelet function in critically ill patients. Chest 106(3):899–903View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yaguchi A, Lobo FL, Vincent JL, Pradier O (2004) Platelet function in sepsis. J Thromb Haemost 2(12):2096–2102View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mavrommatis AC, Theodoridis T, Orfanidou A, Roussos C, Christopoulou-Kokkinou V, Zakynthinos S (2000) Coagulation system and platelets are fully activated in uncomplicated sepsis. Crit Care Med 28(2):451–457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gawaz M, Dickfeld T, Bogner C, Fateh-Moghadam S, Neumann FJ (1997) Platelet function in septic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med 23(4):379–385View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lam WA, Chaudhuri O, Crow A, Webster KD, Li TD, Kita A, Huang J, Fletcher DA (2011) Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat Mater 10(1):61–66View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Walsh MP (2011) Vascular smooth muscle myosin light chain diphosphorylation: mechanism, function, and pathological implications. IUBMB Life 63(11):987–1000View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sutherland C, Walsh MP (2012) Myosin regulatory light chain diphosphorylation slows relaxation of arterial smooth muscle. J Biol Chem 287(29):24064–24076View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson GJ, Leis LA, Krumwiede MD, White JG (2007) The critical role of myosin IIA in platelet internal contraction. J Thromb Haemost 5(7):1516–1529View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Muranyi A, Erdodi F, Ito M, Gergely P, Hartshorne DJ (1998) Identification and localization of myosin phosphatase in human platelets. Biochem J 330(Pt 1):225–231PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassock SR, Zhu MX, Trost C, Flockerzi V, Authi KS (2002) Expression and role of TRPC proteins in human platelets: evidence that TRPC6 forms the store-independent calcium entry channel. Blood 100(8):2801–2811View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Rourke FA, Halenda SP, Zavoico GB, Feinstein MB (1985) Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate releases Ca2+ from a Ca2+-transporting membrane vesicle fraction derived from human platelets. J Biol Chem 260(2):956–962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klages B, Brandt U, Simon MI, Schultz G, Offermanns S (1999) Activation of G12/G13 results in shape change and Rho/Rho-kinase-mediated myosin light chain phosphorylation in mouse platelets. J Cell Biol 144(4):745–754View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson DP, Susnjar M, Kiss E, Sutherland C, Walsh MP (2005) Thromboxane A2-induced contraction of rat caudal arterial smooth muscle involves activation of Ca2+ entry and Ca2+ sensitization: Rho-associated kinase-mediated phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-855, but not Thr-697. Biochem J 389(Pt 3):763–774PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakai K, Suzuki Y, Kihira H, Wada H, Fujioka M, Ito M, Nakano T, Kaibuchi K, Shiku H, Nishikawa M (1997) Regulation of myosin phosphatase through phosphorylation of the myosin-binding subunit in platelet activation. Blood 90(10):3936–3942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bauer M, Retzer M, Wilde JI, Maschberger P, Essler M, Aepfelbacher M, Watson SP, Siess W (1999) Dichotomous regulation of myosin phosphorylation and shape change by Rho-kinase and calcium in intact human platelets. Blood 94(5):1665–1672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV (2003) Ca2+ sensitivity of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II: modulated by G proteins, kinases, and myosin phosphatase. Physiol Rev 83(4):1325–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Walsh MP, Susnjar M, Deng J, Sutherland C, Kiss E, Wilson DP (2007) Phosphorylation of the protein phosphatase type 1 inhibitor protein CPI-17 by protein kinase C. Methods Mol Biol 365:209–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Watanabe Y, Ito M, Kataoka Y, Wada H, Koyama M, Feng J, Shiku H, Nishikawa M (2001) Protein kinase C-catalyzed phosphorylation of an inhibitory phosphoprotein of myosin phosphatase is involved in human platelet secretion. Blood 97(12):3798–3805View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rink TJ, Smith SW, Tsien RY (1982) Cytoplasmic free Ca2+ in human platelets: Ca2+ thresholds and Ca-independent activation for shape-change and secretion. FEBS Lett 148(1):21–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Simpson AW, Hallam TJ, Rink TJ (1986) Low concentrations of the stable prostaglandin endoperoxide U44069 stimulate shape change in quin2-loaded platelets without a measurable increase in [Ca2+]i. FEBS Lett 201(2):301–305View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Moers A, Nieswandt B, Massberg S, Wettschureck N, Gruner S, Konrad I, Schulte V, Aktas B, Gratacap MP, Simon MI Gawaz M, Offermanns S (2003) G13 is an essential mediator of platelet activation in hemostasis and thrombosis. Nat Med 9(11):1418–1422View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Suzuki Y, Yamamoto M, Wada H, Ito M, Nakano T, Sasaki Y, Narumiya S, Shiku H, Nishikawa M (1999) Agonist-induced regulation of myosin phosphatase activity in human platelets through activation of Rho-kinase. Blood 93(10):3408–3417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Offermanns S (2006) Activation of platelet function through G protein-coupled receptors. Circ Res 99(12):1293–1304View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. da Silva-Santos JE, Chiao CW, Leite R, Webb RC (2009) The Rho-A/Rho-kinase pathway is up-regulated but remains inhibited by cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent mechanisms during endotoxemia in small mesenteric arteries. Crit Care Med 37(5):1716–1723View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Reddi BAJ, Young RL, Wilson DP (2012) The importance of calcium desensitisation in mediating pathological vasopressor resistance following sepsis. J Vasc Res 49(suppl1):1–42Google Scholar
  37. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA,Beale RJ, Vincent J L,Moreno, R (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41(2):580–637View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Samama CM, Thiry D, Elalamy I, Diaby M, Guillosson JJ, Kieffer E, Coriat P (2001) Perioperative activation of hemostasis in vascular surgery patients. Anesthesiology 94(1):74–78View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22(7):707–710View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanke AA, Roberg K, Monaca E, Sellmann T, Weber CF, Rahe-Meyer N, Gorlinger K (2010) Impact of platelet count on results obtained from multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate). European journal of medical research 15(5):214–219PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Paniccia R, Antonucci E, Maggini N, Romano E, Gori AM, Marcucci R, Prisco D, Abbate R (2009) Assessment of platelet function on whole blood by multiple electrode aggregometry in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease receiving antiplatelet therapy. Am J Clin Pathol 131(6):834–842View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Akca S, Haji-Michael P, de Mendonca A, Suter P, Levi M, Vincent JL (2002) Time course of platelet counts in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 30(4):753–756View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Levi M, van der Poll T (2004) Coagulation in sepsis: all bugs bite equally. Crit Care 8(2):99–100View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Adamzik M, Gorlinger K, Peters J, Hartmann M (2012) Whole blood impedance aggregometry as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of severe sepsis. Crit Care 16(5):R204View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jackson SP, Nesbitt WS, Kulkarni S (2003) Signaling events underlying thrombus formation. J Thromb Haemost 1(7):1602–1612View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nieswandt B, Watson SP (2003) Platelet-collagen interaction: is GPVI the central receptor? Blood 102(2):449–461View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Whiteheart SW (2011) Platelet granules: surprise packages. Blood 118(5):1190–1191View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Paul BZ, Jin J, Kunapuli SP (1999) Molecular mechanism of thromboxane A(2)-induced platelet aggregation. Essential role for p2t(ac) and alpha(2a) receptors. J Biol Chem 274(41):29108–29114View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Goel MS, Diamond SL (2004) Factor VIIa-mediated tenase function on activated platelets under flow. J Thromb Haemost 2(8):1402–1410View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Dyszkiewicz-Korpanty AM, Frenkel EP, Sarode R (2005) Approach to the assessment of platelet function: comparison between optical-based platelet-rich plasma and impedance-based whole blood platelet aggregation methods. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 11(1):25–35View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ono A, Westein E, Hsiao S, Nesbitt WS, Hamilton JR, Schoenwaelder SM, Jackson SP (2008) Identification of a fibrin-independent platelet contractile mechanism regulating primary hemostasis and thrombus growth. Blood 112(1):90–99View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hashimoto Y, Sasaki H, Togo M, Tsukamoto K, Horie Y, Fukata H, Watanabe T, Kurokawa K (1994) Roles of myosin light-chain kinase in platelet shape change and aggregation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1223(2):163–169View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Missy K, Plantavid M, Pacaud P, Viala C, Chap H, Payrastre B (2001) Rho-kinase is involved in the sustained phosphorylation of myosin and the irreversible platelet aggregation induced by PAR1 activating peptide. Thromb Haemost 85(3):514–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schoenwaelder SM, Hughan SC, Boniface K, Fernando S, Holdsworth M, Thompson PE, Salem HH, Jackson SP (2002) RhoA sustains integrin alpha IIbbeta 3 adhesion contacts under high shear. J Biol Chem 277(17):14738–14746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lefebvre P, White JG, Krumwiede MD, Cohen I (1993) Role of actin in platelet function. Eur J Cell Biol 62(2):194–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Khurana T, Khurana B, Noegel AA (2002) LIM proteins: association with the actin cytoskeleton. Protoplasma 219(1–2):1–12View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A, Obinata T, Ohashi K, Mizuno K, Narumiya S (1999) Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285(5429):895–898View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang SA, Carpenter CL, Abrams CS (2004) Rho and Rho-kinase mediate thrombin-induced phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase trafficking in platelets. J Biol Chem 279(40):42331–42336View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pleines I, Hagedorn I, Gupta S, May F, Chakarova L, van Hengel J, Offermanns S, Krohne G, Kleinschnitz C, Brakebusch C, Nieswandt B (2012) Megakaryocyte-specific RhoA deficiency causes macrothrombocytopenia and defective platelet activation in hemostasis and thrombosis. Blood 119(4):1054–1063View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Paul BZ, Kim S, Dangelmaier C, Nagaswami C, Jin J, Hartwig JH, Weisel JW, Daniel JL, Kunapuli SP (2003) Dynamic regulation of microtubule coils in ADP-induced platelet shape change by p160ROCK (Rho-kinase). Platelets 14(3):159–169View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Weernink PA, Meletiadis K, Hommeltenberg S, Hinz M, Ishihara H, Schmidt M, Jakobs KH (2004) Activation of type I phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase isoforms by the Rho GTPases, RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. J Biol Chem 279(9):7840–7849View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Luykenaar KD, El-Rahman RA, Walsh MP, Welsh DG (2009) Rho-kinase-mediated suppression of KDR current in cerebral arteries requires an intact actin cytoskeleton. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296(4):H917-926View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Watanabe N, Kato T, Fujita A, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S (1999) Cooperation between mDia1 and ROCK in Rho-induced actin reorganization. Nat Cell Biol 1(3):136–143View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Fujihara H, Walker LA, Gong MC, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Somlyo AV, Somlyo AP (1997) Inhibition of RhoA translocation and calcium sensitization by in vivo ADP-ribosylation with the chimeric toxin DC3B. Mol Biol Cell 8(12):2437–2447View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sugai M, Hashimoto K, Kikuchi A, Inoue S, Okumura H, Matsumoto K, Goto Y, Ohgai H, Moriishi K, Syuto B Yoshikawa K, Suginaka H, Takai Y (1992) Epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor ADP-ribosylates small GTP-binding proteins and induces hyperplasia of epidermis. J Biol Chem 267(4):2600–2604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sorg I, Goehring UM, Aktories K, Schmidt G (2001) Recombinant Yersinia YopT leads to uncoupling of RhoA-effector interaction. Infect Immun 69(12):7535–7543View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Reddi et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.