Open Access

Alveolar instability (atelectrauma) is not identified by arterial oxygenation predisposing the development of an occult ventilator-induced lung injury

  • Penny L Andrews2,
  • Benjamin Sadowitz1,
  • Michaela Kollisch-Singule1,
  • Joshua Satalin1Email author,
  • Shreyas Roy1,
  • Kathy Snyder1,
  • Louis A Gatto3,
  • Gary F Nieman1 and
  • Nader M Habashi3
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20153:16

DOI: 10.1186/s40635-015-0054-1

Received: 12 February 2015

Accepted: 23 May 2015

Published: 9 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Improperly set mechanical ventilation (MV) with normal lungs can advance lung injury and increase the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A key mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is an alteration in alveolar mechanics including alveolar instability or recruitment/derecruitment (R/D). We hypothesize that R/D cannot be identified by PaO2 (masking occult VILI), and if protective ventilation is not applied, ARDS incidence will increase.

Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8) were anesthetized, surgically instrumented, and placed on MV. A thoracotomy was performed and an in vivo microscope attached to the pleural surface of the lung with baseline dynamic changes in alveolar size during MV recorded. Alveolar instability was induced by intra-tracheal instillation of Tween and alveolar R/D identified as a marked change in alveolar size from inspiration to expiration with increases in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels.

Results

Despite maintaining a clinically acceptable PaO2 (55–80 mmHg), the alveoli remained unstable with significant R/D at low PEEP levels. Although PaO2 consistently increased with an increase in PEEP, R/D did not plateau until PEEP was >9 cmH2O.

Conclusions

PaO2 remained clinically acceptable while alveolar instability persisted at all levels of PEEP (especially PEEP <9 cmH2O). Therefore, PaO2 levels cannot be used reliably to guide protective MV strategies or infer that VILI is not occurring. Using PaO2 to set a PEEP level necessary to stabilize the alveoli could underestimate the potential for VILI. These findings highlight the need for more accurate marker(s) of alveolar stability to guide protective MV necessary to prevent VILI.

Background

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a serious clinical challenge affecting nearly 200,000 patients annually, claiming the lives of 30–40 % of those afflicted [1]. Although mechanical ventilation (MV) is applied to patients without lung injury, improperly set MV [2] can cause a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) [3], playing a key role in the high incidence of ARDS (25 %) within 48 h of MV initiation [4, 5]. Most cases of ARDS evolve over 30–72 h after hospital admission where lung protective strategies are typically implemented after the development of lung injury and clinically diagnosed by a deterioration of oxygenation characterized by a decline in PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio [6, 7]. Although there are alternative markers of optimizing mechanical ventilation, most definitions of ARDS [6, 7] rely on oxygenation (PaO2) as a marker of pulmonary function. Lung protection is generally instituted in a reactive rather than proactive approach with an emphasis on treating rather than preventing the progression of worsening lung injury. Further, clinicians target PaO2 or saturation (SpO2) [8] to determine if ventilator strategies are effective prior to and after the development of acute lung injury (ALI). However, reliance on PaO2 as a marker of lung function presumes there is no lung injury prior to ARDS perpetuating a binary concept of ARDS. A key to understanding lung-ventilator interactions may lie in sub-clinical mechanisms of lung injury and the impact of MV on the “micro-environment” at the alveolar/alveolar duct level rather than centering on the “macro-environment” and parameters displayed on the ventilator (i.e., tidal volume (Vt), plateau pressure) using PaO2 and SpO2.

Recently, it has been suggested that the primary mechanism of VILI is tidal alveolar recruitment/derecruitment (R/D) [9, 10]. Our group has shown that tidal R/D leads to persistent alveolar instability causing severe histologic lung injury and ARDS [11] and optimizing alveolar stability is critical to preventing VILI and limiting ARDS [1214]. PaO2 may not be an accurate surrogate of alveolar stability; therefore, preventing ARDS using preemptive MV requires clinicians to consider the potential for occult alveolar instability (i.e., R/D without a significant fall in PaO2) [6]. In this study, we hypothesized that in an acutely injured lung, alveolar instability would persist despite improvements in PaO2 with increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Lack of correlation between PaO2 and alveolar stability would provide a mechanistic explanation of why patients with normal PaO2 evolve to ARDS after 48 h of MV [4, 15]. In this study, we show direct visual evidence using in vivo microscopy that alveolar R/D cannot be predicted using PaO2 as a surrogate for alveolar stability and protective MV.

Methods

Vertebrate animals

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, approved the studies. All experiments were performed in adherence to the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health for the use of experimental animals in research.

Surgical preparation

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8) weighing 590 ± 19.2 g were anesthetized via an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine (90 and 10 mg/kg, respectively) dosed at 0.1 mg/kg of ketamine before surgery as well as during the experiment to provide adequate anesthesia. To ensure that the Vt remained constant, the animals were paralyzed with rocuronium to inhibit spontaneous breathing. A tracheostomy was performed, and time-cycled/pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation was initiated with a PEEP of 3 cmH2O, pressure control (P control) of 15 cmH2O, respiratory rate of 30 breaths/min, and FiO2 of 100 % (Hamilton G5 ventilator, Hamilton Medical Inc., Reno, NV). A jugular vein was cannulated for the administration of fluids and a carotid artery catheter placed for blood gas samples and hemodynamic monitoring.

Hemodynamic, pulmonary, and blood gas measurements

Hemodynamic and pulmonary parameters were continuously monitored (Philips Healthcare and Hamilton G5 ventilator). Arterial blood gas was sampled at baseline and each PEEP level, as defined in “Lung injury,” to record pH, PaCO2, PaO2, and PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratios (cobas b221, Roche Diagnostics).

Lung injury

Serial blood gases were taken and the respiratory rate adjusted until PaCO2 was between 35 and 45 mmHg. A baseline blood gas was performed and lung injury induced via 0.2 % Tween-20 in normal saline (16 cc/kg) instillation via an endotracheal tube. This was repeated until a P/F <100 mmHg was reached.

In vivo microscopy

After induction of lung injury, a right thoracotomy was performed to expose the pleural surface of the right lung. The in vivo microscope (epi-objective microscope with epi-illumination; Olympus America Inc.) was approximated to the nondependent (anterior) portion of the right lung and 5 cmH2O suction applied to capture a steady field of the alveoli at ×10 magnification. Although dependent lung regions may be more susceptible to R/D, stability in dependent regions would be unlikely if alveolar stability in nondependent regions was not achieved. In this model, we used individual rats as their own control and documented alveolar stability at baseline. After Tween injury, alveolar behavior became unstable demonstrating R/D. Thirty seconds of video was recorded from an attached digital video camera (Sony CCD color video camera SSC-S20) and uploaded to a computer while maintaining a PEEP of 3 cmH2O and P control of 15 cmH2O. Subsequently, PEEP was increased in 3 cmH2O increments and videos recorded from the in vivo microscopy at each setting until a PEEP of 18 cmH2O was achieved. This procedure was repeated at each PEEP level in five distinct parenchymal areas of the right nondependent lung.

Image capture and processing

Video was captured using Pinnacle Studio software (Corel Corp.) for analysis of alveolar mechanics. Individual frames were extracted and analyzed at the plateau pressure (P plateau) and peak expiration (PEEP) for five lung fields per PEEP level. The alveoli were identified in the frames and manually outlined using Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Inc.) with areas calculated using Image-Pro software (Media Cybernetics). The areas calculated represent alveolar inflation at end-inspiration (I) and end-expiration (E) and are each represented as a fraction of the total microscopic lung field. Alveolar instability was assessed by comparing the percent difference between I and E (%ΔI-E). A greater %ΔI-E is suggestive of increased R/D and alveolar instability.

Statistics

Least squares regression was used to determine whether alveolar stability and arterial oxygenation were linearly related (Microsoft Excel, 2008).

Results

Physiologic parameters

All animals displayed severe lung injury after Tween instillation with average P/F ratio <100 mmHg. As PEEP was increased, there was a concomitant decrease in mean arterial pressure but no change in heart rate (Table 1). With increasing PEEP, there was no significant change in pH but there was a decrease in pCO2 with PEEP above 6 cmH2O. Increasing PEEP led to a correspondent increase in the mean airway pressure (Paw) and P plateau. Tidal volumes were set at 6 cc/kg, and minute ventilation was similar between groups (Table 2).
Table 1

Hemodynamic and blood gas measurements

 

BL-uninjured

Post-injury

PEEP 3

PEEP 6

PEEP 9

PEEP 12

PEEP 15

PEEP 18

HR (beats/min)

189.1 ± 59.1

186.4 ± 45.1

204.9 ± 44.5

172.2 ± 51.1

186.0 ± 38.3

176.7 ± 44.6

179.9 ± 61.5

150.5 ± 42.9

MAP (mmHg)

71.8 ± 21.1

61.3 ± 12.6

50.6 ± 16.2

52.5 ± 26.5

49.0 ± 24.1

47.4 ± 18.1*

44.5 ± 16.5*

39.1 ± 15.7*

pH

7.35 ± 0.07

7.246 ± 0.087

7.204 ± 0.049*

7.153 ± 0.101*

7.209 ± 0.066*

7.197 ± 0.109*

7.21 ± 0.15*

7.199 ± 0.195*

PaCO2 (mmHg)

38.11 ± 11.67

53.58 ± 14.43*

47.42 ± 13.21

49.68 ± 11.22

36.49 ± 4.85

35.43 ± 5.99

32.0 ± 7.0

29.39 ± 7.17

PaO2 (mmHg)

467.5 ± 163.5

54.03 ± 24.70*

60.07 ± 13.10*

106.3 ± 90.47*

169.7 ± 143.5*

221.5 ± 115.5*

266.0 ± 122.0*

352.0 ± 159.0

FiO2 (%)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

% Saturation

97.63 ± 1.26

56.43 ± 20.96*

64.76 ± 16.04*

65.12 ± 17.54

88.77 ± 5.74

92.26 ± 8.58

93.15 ± 8.11

95.1 ± 5.98

P/F

507.6

54.03*

60.07*

106.3*

169.7*

221.5*

266.0*

352.0*

*p ≤ 0.05 as compared to baseline (BL)

Table 2

Pulmonary measurements

 

BL-uninjured

Post-injury

PEEP 3

PEEP 6

PEEP 9

PEEP 12

PEEP 15

PEEP 18

Vt (ml)/kg

6.0 ± 0.5

5.9 ± 0.3

6.0 ± 0.5

5.9 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.3

5.875 ± 0.354

P control (cmH2O)

12.6 ± 2.5

16.9 ± 1.2*

17.6 ± 2.2*

16.6 ± 2.5*

15.5 ± 3.1

14.9 ± 3.1

14.7 ± 3.9

12.88 ± 5.0

P peak (cmH2O)

15.7 ± 2.6

20.1 ± 1.4*

20.7 ± 2.3*

22.5 ± 2.3*

24.5 ± 3.1*

27.0 ± 3.2*

29.7 ± 3.9*

30.88 ± 5.0*

P plateau (cmH2O)

15.7 ± 2.6

20.0 ± 1.3*

20.6 ± 2.2*

22.6 ± 2.5*

24.5 ± 3.1*

27.0 ± 3.2*

29.7 ± 3.9*

30.88 ± 5.0*

P mean (cmH2O)

6.59 ± 0.65

7.72 ± 0.43

7.94 ± 0.72

10.15 ± 0.95*

11.99 ± 1.35*

13.8 ± 1.9*

15.3 ± 3.6*

14.63 ± 2.8*

MV (l/min)

0.183 ± 0.009

0.187 ± 0.022

0.185 ± 0.022

0.184 ± 0.026

0.188 ± 0.019

0.187 ± 0.016

0.19 ± 0.028

0.175 ± 0.018

RR (breaths/min)

30.5 ± 1.6

30.4 ± 2.0

30.9 ± 2.5

32.0 ± 3.3

32.0 ± 3.3

31.6 ± 2.5

31.4 ± 2.9

30.13 ± 3.23

*p ≤ 0.05 as compared to baseline (BL)

Alveolar stability and PaO2

Subpleural alveoli at I and E in both the uninjured and injured lungs are seen in Fig. 1 with individual alveoli outlined in dots. Measuring alveolar size change between I and E is used to assess alveolar stability.
Fig. 1

In vivo microscopy showing alveolar inflation of non-injured (PEEP 12) and injured (PEEP 18) lungs at end-inspiration and end-expiration

Uninjured alveolar stability and PaO2

There was a minimal size change during tidal ventilation in the normal lung with 12 cmH2O of PEEP compared to a large change in alveolar size in the injured lung indicating severe alveolar instability even with 18 cmH2O of PEEP (Fig. 1).

Injured alveolar stability and PaO2

Examination of the aggregate data shows that a stepwise increase in PEEP (3–9 cmH2O) led to an increase in both alveolar stability and PaO2 (Fig. 2). However, further increased levels of PEEP (12–18 cmH2O) improved PaO2 without a concomitant increase in alveolar stability (Fig. 2). Examination of individual animals demonstrated that PaO2 remained largely unchanged despite a spectrum of alveolar instability at a given PEEP level.
Fig. 2

Stepwise increases in low levels of PEEP (3–9 cmH2O) led to an increase in both alveolar stability and arterial oxygenation as measured by pO2. High levels of PEEP (12–18 cmH2O), however, improved arterial oxygenation in a stepwise fashion without a concomitant increase in alveolar stability

Discussion

The most important findings of this study were as follows: (a) unstable alveoli oxygenated blood to nearly the same PaO2 as stable alveoli, particularly at levels of PEEP of 3–9 cmH2O; (b) alveolar stability did not improve when PEEP was increased above 9 cmH2O despite continual improvement in PaO2 up to PEEP of 18 cmH2O (Fig. 3); and (c) combined with our prior work, this shows that PEEP may have a greater effect recruiting and distending conducting airways rather than the alveoli [16]. In a previous study, we showed increasing levels of PEEP increases micro-strain of the conducting airways with less effect on alveolar area [16]. In the present study, low levels of PEEP may have recruited collapsed conducting airways initially stabilizing communicating alveoli (steep portion of alveolar stability curve in Fig. 2). However, an increase in PEEP may have caused progressive distention in the conducting airways rather than increasing alveolar area and stability. Despite increasing PEEP, alveolar stability plateaus above PEEP of 9 cmH2O and never reaches the complete stability (i.e., R/D = 0 %) of the uninjured lung [17]. These data suggest that alveolar stability has a nonlinear relationship to PaO2.
Fig. 3

Experimental timeline: Following instrumentation, lung injury, and thoracotomy, PEEP titrations were \incrementally increased by 3 cmH2O until 18 cmH2O was reached. Arterial blood gas (ABG) and in vivo microscopy at inspiration and expiration was recorded after a 5-min equilibration

We hypothesize that improvement in PaO2 was due to end-inspiratory tidal recruitment of collapsed alveoli rather than recruitment of unstable alveoli throughout the ventilator cycle (i.e., both I and E). Oxygen would be exchanged during inspiration as the alveolus “pops” open and coupled with the rapid transit time of the erythrocyte, maintaining a relatively normal PaO2; however, the alveoli collapse during expiration. The linear improvement in PaO2 without a corresponding increase in alveolar stability suggests persistent alveolar instability, and the potential to expose the lung to occult VILI exists and may silently progress to clinical ARDS.

Our data and others demonstrate that perhaps the most widely used marker for lung injury [PaO2] is insensitive to detect alveolar instability. Baumgardner et al. used a high-speed intravascular PaO2 sensor in a saline lavage ARDS model and found that PaO2 fluctuated within the respiratory cycle [18]. They postulated that PaO2 rose during inflation when the alveoli were open and fell (during exhalation) when the alveoli collapsed [18]. Using a fiber optic oxygen sensor that detects rapid PaO2 changes, Formenti and colleagues documented PaO2 fluctuations between 37 and 375 mmHg between the I and E cycles as a result of cyclical atelectasis [19]. Caltabeloti et al. have shown, using ultrasound, that lung aeration decreases during fluid loading without any deterioration in PaO2. These data demonstrate that although oxygenation improves, alveolar R/D-induced VILI may persist but cannot be identified by standard clinical measurements (i.e., PaO2). Therefore, if solely guided by PaO2, ventilator adjustments may aggravate alveolar instability, particularly when lung injury is evolving secondary to volume resuscitation and a progressing systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [20]. Furthermore, uncontrolled R/D increases lung inflammatory response and may propagate other organ dysfunctions and multisystem organ failure [21]. This potentially explains the dichotomy of results in the ARDSnet trial (i.e., improved oxygenation in the high Vt/end-inspiratory pressure group, yet an increase in mortality) [22]. The low tidal volume strategy with lower end-inspiratory pressure may have resulted in a greater regional lung collapse and lower oxygenation; but because these regions remain collapsed throughout the breathing cycle, they are protected from tidal R/D, resulting in less alveolar instability rather than overdistension (Fig. 2) [23].

Although recruitment maneuvers (RM) were not used in this study, previous work from this lab using in vivo microscopy demonstrated that the alveoli open following an RM but remain unstable unless combined with sufficient amounts of PEEP to maintain alveolar patency [24]. Oxygenation significantly improves following RMs despite persistent alveolar R/D, suggesting that unstable alveoli participate in oxygenation during the portion of the ventilatory cycle in which they are open [11]. RMs improve oxygenation but have not demonstrated a mortality benefit [25, 26] supporting our postulate that despite improved PaO2, alveolar instability may persist causing progressive lung injury. Nontraditional approaches to MV such as high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) use similar goals of PaO2 or SpO2 to guide adjustment of ventilator settings. Two recent trials used oxygenation triggers to adjust Paw and the decision to convert from HFOV back to conventional ventilation [27, 28]. However, experimentally, we have shown that adjusting Paw during HFOV based on PaO2-guided protocols resulted in significantly greater histologic lung injury as compared with maintaining a constant Paw after lung injury [27, 28]. Combined, these data support our hypothesis that PaO2 does not correlate with alveolar stability with enough sensitivity to guide ventilator adjustments and relying solely on oxygenation to make ventilator adjustments could increase alveolar instability and promote occult VILI.

Clinically, these data may be important as discordance between PaO2 and the degree of alveolar instability creates the potential for occult R/D-induced VILI. Robust clinical markers for evaluating alveolar stability are lacking; thus, VILI remains a genuine concern among clinicians who intend to minimize iatrogenic lung injury during MV. In clinical practice, PaO2 or SpO2 is routinely used to guide ventilator adjustments [8]. The commonly used PEEP/FiO2 table derived from the ARDSnet strategy links a PaO2 or SpO2 goal to regulate PEEP and FiO2. Several investigators have suggested that the PEEP/FiO2 scale does not impose a physiologic end-point for clinical or computed tomography-guided evidence of recruitment and alveolar stability [29, 30]. In addition, clinicians frequently underdiagnose ARDS suggesting that acceptable oxygenation may leave many without concern for ongoing lung injury [31]. In this study, all animals had an acceptable P/F ratio based on the PEEP/FiO2 table despite a 25–60 % increase in alveolar instability from baseline. This suggests that achieving clinically acceptable oxygenation goals may not equate with decreased alveolar instability, allowing persistent R/D and the potential for VILI.

Summary

This study has identified the need of detecting alveolar instability and optimizing MV settings to promote alveolar stability and lung homogeneity using methods other than PaO2. Possible methods include the following: (a) electrical impedance tomography (EIT) which provides an assessment of lung volume, PEEP level, and Vt distribution rather than the relationship of Vt to ideal body weight [3234]; (b) routine evaluation of the respiratory system as a whole with transpulmonary pressure measurement to determine the effect of the chest wall and abdomen on lung mechanics [3537]; and (c) monitoring the expiratory flow graphics when using modes such as airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) to control expiratory time constants which has been shown to eliminate alveolar instability [38, 39]. These methods are all currently available and may guide ventilator adjustments rather than relying on the insensitivity of PaO2 and SpO2 or the macro-environment parameter such as Paw [14, 3239].

The concept that preemptive ventilation strategies may be therapeutic is obverse to the current understanding that MV creates or aggravates lung injury (i.e., VILI). Although both concepts may be accurate, the key may be the method of MV and the timing of application in the pathogenesis of the disease (i.e., early vs. late) [13, 14, 39, 40]. The causal role of MV in progressing acute lung injury (ALI) may be determined by adjustment of ventilator settings to adequately prevent alveolar instability and heterogeneity. If adjusted properly, the ventilator may be used to halt the progression of ALI pathogenesis and reduce the incidence of ARDS [1214, 16, 39, 40].

Critique of the model

While we speculate that the steady increase observed in PaO2 without a marked change in alveolar stability at PEEP levels of >9 cmH2O was likely due to increased alveolar recruitment, this recruitment was not confirmed by direct measurement. Also, our in vivo microscope has limitations such as the shallow depth of field (70 μm), limiting observations of alveolar mechanics to only two dimensions. We used gentle suction (≤5 cmH2O) to hold lung tissue in place underneath the glass coverslip in all experimental settings standardizing this artifact, which has been shown previously to have minimal effect on alveolar mechanics [41].

Conclusions

Our data suggest that oxygenation (PaO2) may be a poor marker for alveolar stability and occult VILI may exist despite meeting acceptable clinical criteria. Further, using PaO2 to guide titration of MV settings (PEEP and Pplat) may result in increased alveolar instability and increase the potential for VILI. New methods to identify alveolar stability are needed for clinical assessment and protection from occult VILI. In combination with judicious use of MV, the goal of eliminating VILI in the critical care population may eventually be realized.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health grant R33HL089076.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University
(2)
Department of Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
(3)
Department of Biology, SUNY Cortland

References

  1. Goss CH, Brower RG, Hudson LD, Rubenfeld GD, Network A (2003) Incidence of acute lung injury in the United States. Crit Care Med 31:1607–1611PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Whitehead T, Slutsky AS (2002) The pulmonary physician in critical care * 7: ventilator induced lung injury. Thorax 57:635–642PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM (2013) Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369:2126–2136PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, Rana R, St Sauver JL, Lymp JF, Afessa B, Hubmayr RD (2004) Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 32:1817–1824PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Shari G, Kojicic M, Li G, Cartin-Ceba R, Alvarez CT, Kashyap R, Dong Y, Poulose JT, Herasevich V, Garza JA, Gajic O (2011) Timing of the onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study. Respir Care 56:576–582PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 307:2526–2533Google Scholar
  7. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R (1994) The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:818–824PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kallet RH, Alonso JA, Pittet JF, Matthay MA (2004) Prognostic value of the pulmonary dead-space fraction during the first 6 days of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care 49:1008–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Seah AS, Grant KA, Aliyeva M, Allen GB, Bates JHT (2011) Quantifying the roles of tidal volume and PEEP in the pathogenesis of ventilator-induced lung injury. Ann Biomed Eng 39:1505–1516PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Steinberg JM, Schiller HJ, Halter JM, Gatto LA, Lee HM, Pavone LA, Nieman GF (2004) Alveolar instability causes early ventilator-induced lung injury independent of neutrophils. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:57–63PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Halter JM, Steinberg JM, Gatto LA, DiRocco JD, Pavone LA, Schiller HJ, Albert S, Lee HM, Carney D, Nieman GF (2007) Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume on lung injury induced by alveolar instability. Crit Care 11:R20PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Andrews PL, Shiber JR, Jaruga-Killeen E, Roy S, Sadowitz B, O’Toole RV, Gatto LA, Nieman GF, Scalea T, Habashi NM (2013) Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce mortality in high-risk trauma patients: a systematic review of observational trauma ARDS literature. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75:635–641PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Roy S, Sadowitz B, Andrews P, Gatto LA, Marx W, Ge L, Wang G, Lin X, Dean DA, Kuhn M, Ghosh A, Satalin J, Snyder K, Vodovotz Y, Nieman G, Habashi N (2012) Early stabilizing alveolar ventilation prevents acute respiratory distress syndrome: a novel timing-based ventilatory intervention to avert lung injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:391–400PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Roy S, Habashi N, Sadowitz B, Andrews P, Ge L, Wang G, Roy P, Ghosh A, Kuhn M, Satalin J, Gatto LA, Lin X, Dean DA, Vodovotz Y, Nieman G (2013) Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury. Shock 39:28–38PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jia X, Malhotra A, Saeed M, Mark RG, Talmor D (2008) Risk factors for ARDS in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for > 48 h. Chest 133:853–861PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kollisch-Singule M EB, Smith B, Ruiz C, Roy S, Meng Q, Jain S, Satalin J, Snyder K, Ghosh A, Marx W, Andrews P, Habashi N, Nieman G, Gatto LA (2014) Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) reduces conducting airway micro-strain in lung injury. JACS 219:968–76Google Scholar
  17. Pavone L, Albert S, DiRocco J, Gatto L, Nieman G (2007) Alveolar instability caused by mechanical ventilation initially damages the nondependent normal lung. Crit Care 11:R104PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Baumgardner JE, Markstaller K, Pfeiffer B, Doebrich M, Otto CM (2002) Effects of respiratory rate, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure on PaO2 oscillations after saline lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:1556–1562PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Formenti F, Chen R, McPeak H, Matejovic M, Farmery AD, Hahn CE (2014) A fibre optic oxygen sensor that detects rapid PO2 changes under simulated conditions of cyclical atelectasis in vitro. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 191:1–8PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Caltabeloti F, Monsel A, Arbelot C, Brisson H, Lu Q, Gu WJ, Zhou GJ, Auler JO, Rouby JJ (2014) Early fluid loading in acute respiratory distress syndrome with septic shock deteriorates lung aeration without impairing arterial oxygenation: a lung ultrasound observational study. Crit Care 18:R91PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Del Sorbo L, Slutsky AS (2011) Acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 17:1–6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. ARDSnet (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. The New England journal of medicine 342:1301–1308Google Scholar
  23. Tsuchida S, Engelberts D, Peltekova V, Hopkins N, Frndova H, Babyn P, McKerlie C, Post M, McLoughlin P, Kavanagh BP (2006) Atelectasis causes alveolar injury in nonatelectatic lung regions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:279–289PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Halter JM, Steinberg JM, Schiller HJ, DaSilva M, Gatto LA, Landas S, Nieman GF (2003) Positive end-expiratory pressure after a recruitment maneuver prevents both alveolar collapse and recruitment/derecruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:1620–1626PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fan E, Wilcox ME, Brower RG, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Lapinsky SE, Meade MO, Ferguson ND (2008) Recruitment maneuvers for acute lung injury: a systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178:1156–1163PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgson C, Keating JL, Holland AE, Davies AR, Smirneos L, Bradley SJ, Tuxen D (2009) Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute lung injury receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006667.pub2.Google Scholar
  27. Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Mehta S, Hand L, Austin P, Zhou Q, Matte A, Walter SD, Lamontagne F, Granton JT, Arabi YM, Arroliga AC, Stewart TE, Slutsky AS, Meade MO, Investigators OT, Canadian Critical Care Trials G (2013) High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 368:795–805PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Young D, Lamb SE, Shah S, MacKenzie I, Tunnicliffe W, Lall R, Rowan K, Cuthbertson BH, Group OS (2013) High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 368:806–813PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Grasso S, Stripoli T, De Michele M, Bruno F, Moschetta M, Angelelli G, Munno I, Ruggiero V, Anaclerio R, Cafarelli A, Driessen B, Fiore T (2007) ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176:761–767PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O’Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH (2008) Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 359:2095–2104PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Fernandez-Segoviano P, Aramburu JA, Najera L, Stewart TE (2005) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: underrecognition by clinicians and diagnostic accuracy of three clinical definitions. Crit Care Med 33:2228–2234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bikker IG, Leonhardt S, Reis Miranda D, Bakker J, Gommers D (2010) Bedside measurement of changes in lung impedance to monitor alveolar ventilation in dependent and non-dependent parts by electrical impedance tomography during a positive end-expiratory pressure trial in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care 14:R100PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Muders T, Luepschen H, Zinserling J, Greschus S, Fimmers R, Guenther U, Buchwald M, Grigutsch D, Leonhardt S, Putensen C, Wrigge H (2012) Tidal recruitment assessed by electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography in a porcine model of lung injury*. Crit Care Med 40:903–911PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Blankman P, Hasan D, Erik G, Gommers D (2014) Detection of ‘best’ positive end-expiratory pressure derived from electrical impedance tomography parameters during a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial. Crit Care 18:R95PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Talmor D, Sarge T, O’Donnell CR, Ritz R, Malhotra A, Lisbon A, Loring SH (2006) Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 34:1389–1394PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Loring SH, Pecchiari M, Della Valle P, Monaco A, Gentile G, D’Angelo E (2010) Maintaining end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure prevents worsening of ventilator-induced lung injury caused by chest wall constriction in surfactant-depleted rats. Crit Care Med 38:2358–2364PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Valenza F (2004) Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care 8:350–355PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kollisch-Singule M, Emr B, Smith B, Roy S, Jain S, Satalin J, Snyder K, Andrews P, Habashi N, Bates J, Marx W, Nieman G, Gatto LA (2014) Mechanical Breath Profile of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: The Effect on Alveolar Recruitment and Microstrain in Acute Lung Injury. JAMA Surg 149:1138–1145PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Roy SK, Emr B, Sadowitz B, Gatto LA, Ghosh A, Satalin JM, Snyder KP, Ge L, Wang G, Marx W, Dean D, Andrews P, Singh A, Scalea T, Habashi N, Nieman GF (2013) Preemptive application of airway pressure release ventilation prevents development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in a rat traumatic hemorrhagic shock model. Shock 40:210–216PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Emr B, Gatto L, Roy S, Satalin J, Ghosh A, Snyder K, Andrews P, Habashi N, Marx W, Ge L, Wang G, Dean D, Vodovotz Y, Nieman G (2013) Airway pressure release ventilation prevents ventilator-induced lung injury in normal lungs. JAMA Surg 148:1005–12Google Scholar
  41. Nieman GF, Bredenberg CE, Clark WR, West NR (1981) Alveolar function following surfactant deactivation. J Appl Physiol 51:895–904PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Andrews et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.