Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics and study design of studies

From: Heart rate variability in critical care medicine: a systematic review

Reference number. author

Year

Study design

Study populations (± comparator group)

Patients (n)

Age (mean ± SD or mean [range])

Male (%)

20. Annane

1999

Case–control

Sepsis (healthy controls)

26

Septic shock 52 ± 14

Sepsis 54 ± 17

Control 43 ± 11

65

21. Korach

2001

Cohort

Sepsis

41

50 [20–90]

44

22. Barnaby

2002

Cohort

Sepsis

15

59 [39–85]

–

23. Pontet

2003

Case–control

Sepsis + MODS

(Sepsis − MODS)

22

MODS 59.5 ± 17.8

Non-MODS 60 ± 10.4

64

24.Shen

2003

Cohort

Weaning

24

Successful wean 76 ± 12.9

Unsuccessful wean 69.8 ± 17.8

42

25. Schmidt

2005

Cohort

MODS

(literature values)

85

60.4 ± 14

62

26. Papaioannou

2006

Cohort

MODS

53

63.02 ± 14.68

58

44. Bourgault

2006

Cohort

Mixed aetiology

18

60 [33–82]

72

45. Chen

2007

Cohort

Sepsis

81

67 [30–84]

41

50. Passariello

2007

Case–control

Ischaemic sudden death

40

Sudden death 66 ± 8

Pathology matched controls 68 ± 8

 

46. Chen

2008

Cohort

Sepsis

132

67 [27–86]

47

47. Aboab

2008

Case–control

Sepsis ± adrenal insufficiency

(healthy controls)

81

Septic shock and adrenal failure 55 ± 16

Septic shock 58 ± 19

Healthy controls (not provided)

36

27. Nogueira

2008

Cohort

Sepsis

31

Survivors 44.9 ± 5.9

Non-survivors 55.6 ± 4.63

74

28. Papaioannou

2009

Cohort

Sepsis

(Sepsis SOFA <10)

45

57.8

–

51. Tiainen

2009

Cohort

Out of hospital cardiac arrest

70

Hypothermia 60 (23–75)

Normothermia 59 (18–75)

86

29. Schmidt

2010

Case–controla

MODS

178

61.1 ± 13.2

67

30. Kasaoka

2010

Cohort

SIRS

10

53 ± 15

70

31. Chen

2012

Case–control

Sepsis and out of hospital cardiac arrest

(Non-severe sepsis and healthy controls)

210

Out of hospital cardiac arrest 68 ± 10

Severe sepsis and mechanical ventilation 66 ± 8

Severe sepsis 68 ± 7

Sepsis 67 ± 6

Healthy 66 ± 6

55

32.Gomez Duque

2012

Cohort

Sepsis

(literature values)

100

55 [18–88]

42

33. Brown

2013

Cohort

Sepsis

48

57 [40–63]

46

34. Green

2013

Cohort

MODS

33

56.5 ± 15.9

61

35.Wieske

2013

Cohort

ICU acquired weakness

83

ICU acquired weakness 60 ± 13

No ICU acquired weakness 59 ± 16

60

36. Wieske

2013

Cohort

Mixed aetiology

(healthy controls)

32

Patients 54 ± 15

Healthy control 36 ± 2

70

37. Bradley

2013

Cohort

Mixed aetiology

33

56.5 ± 15.9

61

38. Huang

2014

Cohort

Mixed aetiology

101

Successful 65 ± 18

Unsuccessful 71 ± 16

65

39. Zhang

2014

Cohort

SIRS/MODS

(non-MODS)

41

47 [34–59]

54

40. Schmidt

2014

Case–controla

CCF and MODS

(literature values)

130

CCF 63 ± 10.1

MODS 62.8 ± 10.2

63

52. Tang

2014

Case–control

Stroke

227

AF stroke 74 ± 12

Non-AF stroke 62 ± 15

Age/sex-matched controls 61 ± 10

40

41. Zaal

2015

Case–control

ICU delirium

(no delirium)

25

ICU delirium 67 ± 12

No ICU delirium 57 ± 16

72

42. Hammash

2015

Cohort

Weaning

35

53.3 ± 14.6

66

53. Nagaraj

2016

Case seriesa

Not specified

40

56.3 ± 16.8

62.5

  1. Reference for each paper is shown before first author (first column)
  2. CCF congestive cardiac failure, MODS multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment
  3. aRetrospective analysis