Table 2 (abstract P5). Performance comparison of recently available simplified-ICU severity scores
From: Sepsis 2018
Model | THAI-ICU 2018 | SMS-ICU 2018 [3] | Haniffa et al’s model, 2017 [4] | R-MPM 2016 [5] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geographic regions | Thailand | Denmark, European countries, Brazil, Canada, Australia | Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bagladesh | Rwanda |
Centers | 17 | 5 international, multicenter studies and RCTs | 21 | 2 |
Predicted outcome | Hospital mortality | 90-day mortality | ICU mortality | Hospital mortality |
Total study population, n | 5,412 | 4,086 | 3,855 | 427 |
Variables | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
AUC (95% CI) | 0.81 (0.78, 0.83) | 0.72 (0.71, 0.74) | 0.77 (0.73, 0.80) | 0.81 |
Sensitivity (%) | 72 | N/A | 70 | N/A |
Specificity (%) | 73 | N/A | 69 | N/A |
H/L C- statistic (p) | 13.5 (p = 0.20) | 9.04 (p = 0.34) | 11.31(p = 0.19) | 11.94 (p = 0.15) |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.323 | 0.19 | N/A | N/A |
Brier Score (95% CI) | 0.16 (0.15, 0.17) | N/A | 0.14 (0.12, 0.15) | 0.18 |