Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Fig. 1

From: Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategies

Fig. 1

Cytokines that significantly differed among study treatments, per times of assessment. a IFN-Ī³ differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.043); no differences were found among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.470) and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.847). b IL-1Ɵ differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.038); whereas, we did not find differences among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.869) and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.973). c IL-1RA differed among study treatments (pā€‰<ā€‰0.001); whereas, we did not find differences among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.151) and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.618). d IL-4 differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.064); no differences among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.861) and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.967) were found. e IL-8 differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.066) and no differences among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.915) and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.978) were found. f IL-18 differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.005); whereas, among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.879), and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.991) no differences were found. g Angiotensin-2 differed among study treatments (pā€‰=ā€‰0.048); whereas, among times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.552), and study treatments Ɨ times of assessment (pā€‰=ā€‰0.949) no differences were found. IFN interferon, IL interleukin, EFB + PEEP expiratory flow bias and positive end-expiratory pressure group

Back to article page