Fig. 1From: Appraisal of systemic inflammation and diagnostic markers in a porcine model of VAP: secondary analysis from a study on novel preventive strategiesCytokines that significantly differed among study treatments, per times of assessment. a IFN-Ī³ differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.043); no differences were found among times of assessment (pā=ā0.470) and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.847). b IL-1Ć differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.038); whereas, we did not find differences among times of assessment (pā=ā0.869) and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.973). c IL-1RA differed among study treatments (pā<ā0.001); whereas, we did not find differences among times of assessment (pā=ā0.151) and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.618). d IL-4 differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.064); no differences among times of assessment (pā=ā0.861) and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.967) were found. e IL-8 differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.066) and no differences among times of assessment (pā=ā0.915) and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.978) were found. f IL-18 differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.005); whereas, among times of assessment (pā=ā0.879), and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.991) no differences were found. g Angiotensin-2 differed among study treatments (pā=ā0.048); whereas, among times of assessment (pā=ā0.552), and study treatments Ć times of assessment (pā=ā0.949) no differences were found. IFN interferon, IL interleukin, EFB + PEEP expiratory flow bias and positive end-expiratory pressure groupBack to article page