Skip to main content

Table 2 Pressure-volume in RV and LV during CS and mechanical support

From: Unloading using Impella CP during profound cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure in a large animal model: impact on the right ventricle

 

Baseline, n = 18

Shock, n = 18

Impella CP + minimally required NE, n = 18

p value

RV EDV, mL, mean (SD)

173 (28)

169 (41)

190 (34)

Base vs shock: 1.00

Shock vs Imp: 0.07

RV ESP, mmHg, median (Q1, Q3)

26 (25, 28)

27 (25, 30)

29 (27, 34)

Base vs shock: 1.00

Shock vs Imp: 0.006

RV EDP, mmHg, mean (SD)

11 (3)

13 (3)

13 (3)

Base vs shock: 0.001

Shock vs Imp: 0.73

RV Ees, mmHg/mL, median (Q1, Q3)

0.29 (0.22, 0.34)

0.24 (0.19, 0.29)

0.25 (0.18, 0.36)

Base vs shock: 0.07

Shock vs Imp: 0.30

RV Ea, mmHg/mL, median (Q1, Q3)

0.38 (0.31, 0.40)

0.68 (0.64, 0.78)

0.45 (0.40, 0.55)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: 0.009

RV Ea/Ees ratio, median (Q1, Q3)

1.2 (1.1, 1.6)

3.0 (2.4, 4.5)

2.1 (1.3, 2.7)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: 0.001

LV EDV, mL, mean (SD)

196 (25)

254 (34)

162 (41)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: <0.001

LV ESP, mmHg, median (Q1, Q3)

91 (84, 99)

56 (45, 62)

62 (56, 75)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: 0.07

LV EDP, mmHg, mean (SD)

14 (3)

20 (4)

15 (5)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: <0.001

LV Ees, mmHg/mL, median (Q1, Q3)

0.83 (0.66, 1.02)

0.27 (0.24, 0.32)

0.56 (0.45, 0.73)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp: <0.001

LV Ea, mmHg/mL, median (Q1, Q3)

1.2 (1.13, 1.45)

1.59 (1.32, 1.97)

2.05 (0.39, 2.74)

Base vs shock: 0.29

Shock vs Imp: 0.04

LV Ea/Ees, median (Q1, Q3)

1.5 (1.3, 1.9)

6.5 (5.0, 8.2)

3.8 (2.1, 4.8)

Base vs shock: <0.001

Shock vs Imp:<0.001

  1. NE norepinephrine, RV right ventricle, LV left ventricle, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESP end-systolic pressure, EDP end-diastolic pressure, Ees end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, Ea arterial elastance