Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of comparisons between measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in adult patients mechanically ventilated in pressure control mode

From: Inferior vena cava distensibility from subcostal and trans-hepatic imaging using both M-mode or artificial intelligence: a prospective study on mechanically ventilated patients

Comparison

Variable

ICC

95%CI

Mean bias

95%CI

Lower LOA

95% CI

Upper LOA

95% CI

M-SC

AI-SC

IVC Min (mm)

0.79;

− 0.01 to 0.93

3.0;

2.0 to 4.0

− 2.1;

− 3.8 to − 0.3

8.1;

6.3 to 9.8

IVC Max (mm)

0.78;

0.02 to 0.93

2.9;

1.9 to 3.9

− 2.3;

− 4.1 to − 0.5

8.1;

6.4 to 9.9

IVC-DI (%)

0.65;

0.27 to 0.83

− 3.1;

− 6.4 to 0.3

− 20.1;

− 25.9 to − 14.3

13.9;

8.1 to 19.7

M-TH

AI-TH

IVC Min (mm)

0.88;

− 0.06 to 0.96

2.4;

1.8 to 3.1

− 0.7;

− 1.8 to 0.4

5.6;

4.5 to 6.7

IVC Max (mm)

0.85;

− 0.08 to 0.96

2.5;

1.9 to 3.2

− 0.8;

− 2.0 to 0.3

5.9;

4.7 to 7.1

IVC-DI (%)

0.65;

0.25 to 0.84

− 2.0;

− 5.5 to 1.5

− 19.3;

− 25.4 to 13.3

15.4;

9.3 to 21.5

M-SC

M-TH

IVC Min (mm)

0.74;

0.41 to 0.88

1.1;

− 0.7 to 2.8

− 6.9;

− 9.9 to − 4.0

9.1;

6.1 to 12.0

IVC Max (mm)

0.69;

0.30 to 0.86

1.2;

− 0.5 to 3.0

− 7.0;

− 10.0 to -3.9

9.5;

6.4 to 12.5

IVC-DI (%)

0.54;

− 0.09 to 0.80

0.1;

− 4.0 to 4.2

− 19.0;

− 26.2 to − 11.9

19.3;

12.1 to 26.4

AI-SC

AI-TH

IVC Min (mm)

0.77;

0.46 to 0.90

0.4

− 6.9;

− 9.9 to − 4.9

7.8;

5.75 to 10.82

IVC Max (mm)

0.76;

0.45 to 0.90

0.9

− 6.0;

− 8.9 to − 4.1

7.8;

5.9 to 10.7

IVC-DI (%)

0.32;

− 0.63 to 0.72

2.0

− 25.7;

− 35.4 to − 19.3

29.7;

23.3 to 39.4

  1. In case of the IVC size analysis in M-mode (M), we analyzed a single measure which was the most reliable measure as decided by the experienced operator performing the calculations. In case of the analysis with artificial intelligence (AI), repeated measures were taken and saved in the database. Results of IVC distensibility, minimum and maximum diameters (IVC-DI, IVC-min and IVC-max, respectively) are provided in terms of mean Bias and limits of agreement (LoA) with their relative 95% confidence interval (CI) where appropriate. We also provide intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to describe how strong the measurements resemble each other
  2. The IVC-DI was the primary outcome and it is indicated in bold font