Skip to main content

Table 7 Experimental conduct and exclusion criteria of neutrophil respiratory burst studies

From: Uncontrolled sepsis: a systematic review of translational immunology studies in intensive care medicine

Author

Study population

Sample timing

Definition of sepsis

Microbiology results provided

Independent adjudication of sepsis diagnosis

Exclusion criteria immunosuppressive disease

Exclusion criteria malignancy

Primary conclusion of study (in relation to neutrophil respiratory burst)

Time of first sample

No. samples (time span)

Santos [12]

Sepsis

72 h (Dx sepsis); 48 h (organ failure); onset of septic shock

2 (7 days)

1 A,B,C

N

N

Y

Y

Reactive oxygen species production by neutrophils is increased in sepsis, and [it] is associated with poor outcome

Gorgulu [19]

Trauma

24 h (Hosp Adm)

1

2 A,B,C

N

N

Y

N

Fas stimulation of septic neutrophils promotes apoptosis and inhibits functionality, partially by non-apoptotic signalling

Bruns [13]

Sepsis (cirrhotics)

24 h (Hosp Adm)

1

5

Y

N

Y

N

[Within cirrhotic patients] augmented neutrophil ROS release in response to E. coli…becomes exhausted in the presence of infection

Shih [20]

Trauma

24 h (Hosp Adm)

2 (3 days)

N

N

N

Y

Y

Plasma migration inhibitory factor is one of the important factors responsible for early neutrophil activation

Kasten [21]

Trauma

48 to 72 h (Post-trauma)

1

N

N

N

Y

N

Following trauma, there are concurrent and divergent immunological responses…hyper-inflammatory response by the innate arm…and hypo-inflammatory response by the adaptive arm

Valente [22]

Trauma

48 h (Hosp Adm)

3 (5 days)

N

N

N

Y

N

Injury results in differences in innate immune function in the elderly when compared with controls

Kawasaki [26]

Elective surgery

Pre-insult

5 (4 days)

N

N

N

Y

N

The innate immune system is suppressed from the early period of upper abdominal surgery

Frohlich [27]

Elective surgery

Pre-insult

2 (end of anaesth)

N

n/a

n/a

Y

Y

[This study demonstrates] suppression of neutrophil function by propofol in vitro [but not] in vivo

Martins [14]

Sepsis

48 h (ICU Adm)

1

1 B,C

Y

N

Y

Y

Neutrophil function is enhanced in patients with sepsis

Barth [15]

Sepsis

?

6 (5 days)

1C (>4d)

Y

N

N

N

Endogenous G-CSF increases neutrophil function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

Mariano [16]

Sepsis (renal replacement therapy)

?

4 (1 day)

1, B,D

N

N

N

N

Sera from septic patients [demonstrate] an enhanced priming activity on neutrophils [that is] reduced by ultrafiltration

Quaid [23]

Trauma

24 h (Hosp Adm)

1

N

N

N

N

N

[After severe trauma] IL-8 and GROα lose the ability to regulate the TNFα induced respiratory burst

Wiezer [28]

Elective surgery

Pre-insult

5 (7 days)

“clinical criteria”

N

N

Y

N

Patients undergoing liver resection have an increased activation of leukocytes compared with other major abdominal surgery [that is partially reversed] by endotoxin neutralisation…with rBPI21

Ahmed [17]

Sepsis

72 h (Proof of infection)

1

1 A,B

Y

Y

Y

Y

Septic patients deliver fewer neutrophils to secondary inflammatory sites

Shih [29]

Trauma/Surgery

24 h (Hosp adm)

3+ (7 days)

1 A,B,C

N

N

Y

Y

Surgery after [trauma] has no effect on the priming of neutrophils

Ertel [24]

Trauma

24 h (Hosp adm)

2 (3 days)

N

N

N

Y

N

Severe trauma stimulates acute-phase priming in neutrophils

Ogura [25]

Trauma

24 h (Post-trauma)

4 + 1 (21 days)

2 A B C

Y

N

N

N

Severe trauma stimulates acute-phase priming in neutrophils

Pascual [18]

Sepsis

24 h (ICU adm)

1

1 A C

Y

N

N

N

Plasma of septic patients may have a profound effect on neutrophil response [and] differentiates between sepsis and non-sepsis samples

  1. Sample timing: Were control samples taken at the same time point after the inflammatory stimulus as subject samples? When was the first sample taken from the subject? How many samples were taken for each subject in total and over what time span? Sepsis criteria: The criteria used to enrol subjects into the study. Where subgroups of these criteria were used (e.g. septic shock) these are detailed. 0, not stated; 1, ACCP/SCCM 1992 Consensus Conference [73]; 2, ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference 2001 [74]; 3, SSC Consensus Conference 2008 [75]; 4, CDC NNIC [86]; 5, Microbiology and clinical assessment; 6, Postmortem identification of infection; N, infection not considered; question mark (?), criteria not described. Sepsis severity groups enrolled: A = sepsis, B = severe sepsis, C = septic shock, D = acute renal failure, E = SIRS. Microbiology documentation: Were causative organisms clearly isolated and identified? Were additional steps taken to define whether the subject had sepsis beyond the initial clinical diagnosis, i.e. retrospective review of the case in light of subsequent information?