- Poster presentation
- Open Access
0108. Patients' response to changes in ventilator support. A modelling approach
Intensive Care Medicine Experimentalvolume 2, Article number: P15 (2014)
Understanding patients' response to changes in support ventilation is difficult. Reducing support may result in different patterns of response including changes in depth and frequency of ventilation, possible fatigue and changes in metabolism due to increased respiratory work.
Present and evaluate a mathematical model approach describing patients' response to changes in ventilator support.
A set of mathematical models including pulmonary gas exchange, acid-base chemistry of blood and cerebrospinal fluid, blood oxygenation, O2 and CO2 transport and storage, ventilation, muscle function and chemoreflex respiratory drive were combined. The set of models was used to simulate changes in support during volume and pressure support ventilation. The model set was evaluated in 12 and 5 patients on volume and pressure support respectively. Ethical approval was obtained from the committee of Mid-Jutland, Denmark. Patient or relatives and general practitioners consent was obtained.
For each patient, measurement of pulmonary gas exchange was followed by a series of up to 5 step modifications in the level of ventilator support, with these steps being 50 ml, for volume support, or 2 cm H2O for pressure support. Each level was maintained for 15 minutes, and arterial blood gases measured. Airway pressure, flow, CO2 and O2 were measured continuously throughout the protocol.
The model set was tuned to the data of each patient at baseline conditions. Simulations of patient response at each level of ventilator support were then performed. Agreement between model simulated values and measurements of arterial pH, end tidal CO2 (FeCO2) and respiratory frequency (f) are reported as Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement.
Volume support levels ranged from 0.26-0.65 l and pressure support from 0-14 cmH2O. The resulting values of respiratory frequency ranged from 10-42 min-1, pHa from 7.29-7.50 and FeCO2 from 2.2-7.7 %. The bias and limit of agreement between model predicted and measured values across all patients and at all levels of volume and pressure support were: f 0.0±1.3 min-1, pHa -0.001±0.03 and FeCO2-0.00±0.002 %.
The model describes accurately patient response to changes in ventilator support, identifying the individual patient's chemoreceptor drive and situations where the patient could not respond adequately, resulting in changes in pH. The model description may help to describe patients' response to changes in ventilator support and hence optimize mechanical ventilation for the specific patient.
Georgopoulos D, Roussos C: Eur Respir J. 1996, 9: 2151–2160. 10.1183/09031936.96.09102151
Duffin JJ: Appl Physiol. 2005, 99: 2255–2265. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00640.2005
Gilstrap D, MacIntyre N: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 188: 1058–1068. 10.1164/rccm.201212-2214CI