Skip to main content

Advertisement

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Energy expenditure (EE) in mechanically ventilated patients: espen equation using different body weights (BW) vs. indirect calorimetry (IC)

Article metrics

  • 398 Accesses

Introduction

IC is the reference method to measure EE, but is not available in every healthcare center. ESPEN guidelines recommend using a predictive equation based on the BW before acute illness in case of fluid retention, but the accuracy of this BW is questionable.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to ascertain the accuracy of the ESPEN equation using different BW vs. EE measured by IC, in ventilated patients and to determine the most suitable BW.

Methods

All mechanically ventilated patients staying >72h in ICU, with Fi02 < 60%, PEEP < 9cmH2O, no pulmonary fistula or lung multi-resistant bacteria were included and had IC measurement. We calculated EE with the ESPEN equation (20-25 kcal/kg acute phase and 25-30 kcal/kg post-acute phase), using several BW: anamnestic (BWAN), measured (BWMES), adjusted for water balance (BWADJ) and ideal BW calculated for a body mass index of 22.5 and 25 kg/m2. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Calculated EE was compared to EE measured by IC, with ANOVA repeated measure and Bonferroni post-hoc test, as well as Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

We included 85 patients (57 ± 19 y, 61 men, SAPS II 50 ± 14), including 47 in acute phase. EE calculated with BWAN, BWADJ and BWMES significantly overestimated measured EE by IC (1910 ± 458 kcal/d; p < 0.0001). Differences of calculated EE were statistically significant between the various BW used (p < 0.0001).

Table 1 Differences of EE according to various BW.

Conclusions

It is crucial to define the best BW to be used because it impacts calculated EE. The ideal BW calculated for a BMI at 22.5 kg/m2 matches better with measured EE than other BW. ESPEN equation is not accurate enough to be used in a metabolically heterogeneous ICU population. It tends to overestimate the EE increasing the risk of overnutrition and potential negative impact on clinical outcome.

Author information

Correspondence to CP Heidegger.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graf, S., Genton, L., Oshima, T. et al. Energy expenditure (EE) in mechanically ventilated patients: espen equation using different body weights (BW) vs. indirect calorimetry (IC). ICMx 3, A293 (2015) doi:10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A293

Download citation

Keywords

  • Body Weight
  • Energy Expenditure
  • Fluid Retention
  • Ideal Body Weight
  • Indirect Calorimetry