- Poster presentation
- Open Access
The utility of routine eeg in a general ICU
© Rodini et al.; 2015
- Published: 1 October 2015
- Status Epilepticus
- Epileptiform Activity
- Periodic Discharge
- Acute Brain Injury
- Clinical Seizure
Recent recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine suggest the use of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) for the detection of nonconvulsive seizures (NCSz) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) not only for patients with primary acute brain injury, but also for patients with unexplained coma. However, cEEG monitoring is still unavailable in many ICUs and thus routine EEG is utilized for diagnostic purposes.
To estimate the diagnostic yield of routine EEG in a 15-bed adult general ICU.
A retrospective study was performed that included all ICU patients who underwent at least one EEG over a 2 years period. Demographics, clinical data and EEG indication were collected from medical charts. All EEGs were reviewed by experienced neurophysiologists. Patterns were categorized as following: interictal epileptiform activity, clinical seizures with a clear EEG correlate, periodic discharges, slow polymorphic activity. Modifications in medical management after EEG were recorded.
Routine EEG was performed in 60 patients (39 males, 21 females) over the time period. The mean age was 52,1 (± 17,6) years, mean GCS: 5,7 (± 2,5) and mean Apache II score:20,3 (± 5,7). The overall mortality was 25%. All of them were mechanically ventilated. 43 patients were admitted due to acute central nervous system (CNS) disease and 17 patients due to sepsis and/or septic shock. The main indications for ordering a routine EEG were the unexplained impairment of consciousness (n = 34) and the presence of seizures or any other seizure-like movements (n = 26). Analysis of EEG findings showed: epileptiform activity = 6 (10%), clinical seizures with a clear EEG correlate = 2 (3,3%), periodic discharges = 9 (15%), slow polymorphic activity : 43 (71,7%). Periodic discharges pattern was further analyzed and 8 of them were characterized as NCSE according to certain criteria. All 8 NCSE patients had a CNS injury on admission and were on antiepileptic drugs (AED) on the EEG day. After EEG, the antiepileptic treatment was modified in 19 patients (31,6%).
In our series, routine EEG was helpful in confirming NCSE among patients with brain injury and had an impact on management. However, exclusion of seizures in comatose ICU patients needs prolonged monitoring. The use of cEEG would allow us to identify NCSE more accurately and help to titrate AEDs.
- Claassen J, et al: Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39: 1337-51. 10.1007/s00134-013-2938-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chong DJ, Hirsch LJ: Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the Evidence for Treatment of Periodic Epileptiform Discharges and Related Patterns. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005, 22 (2): 79-91. 10.1097/01.WNP.0000158699.78529.AF.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.