Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis for rhythm and cardiac index including mean differences between measurements, the standard deviation of the differences and the 95% Bland–Altman limits of agreement

From: Comparison of cardiac index measurements in intensive care patients using continuous wave vs. pulsed wave echo-Doppler compared to pulse contour cardiac output

Measurements

No.

Mean difference (L/min/m2)

Standard deviation difference (L/min/m2)

95% Bland–Altman limits (L/min/m2)

Sinus rhythm

 CW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

50

− 0.17

0.63

(− 1.40, 1.07)

 PW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

50

− 0.53

0.51

(− 1.54, 0.47)

High CI (> 4 L/min)

 CW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

7

− 0.57

0.69

(− 1.93, 0.78)

 PW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

7

− 0.95

0.63

(− 2.19, 0.29)

Low CI (< 2.5 L/min)

 CW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

22

− 0.04

0.52

(− 1.06, 0.98)

 PW-VTI CI and PiCCO CIa

22

− 0.39

0.36

(− 1.10, 0.44)

  1. N Number of patients; CI Cardiac Index; CW-VTI Continuous-wave Velocity Time integral; CW-VTI Pulsed-wave Velocity Time integral; PiCCO Pulse Contour Cardiac Output
  2. aDifferences calculated as values for CW-VTI minus value for PiCCO
  3. bDifferences calculated as values for CW-VTI minus value for PW-VTI