- Poster presentation
- Open Access
A case series of a pav+ weaning protocol in an acute care environment demonstrating an absence of weaning failure
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental volume 3, Article number: A1008 (2015)
Most patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) in critical care units are liberated from the ventilator within a median of 7 days. Unfortunately, some patients experience difficulty in liberation from MV during their ICU stays and require extended time on MV. It has been estimated that 40% of the patient's duration on the ventilator is spent weaning. Moreover, although patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation represent approximately 6% of all ventilated patients, they consume 37% of intensive care unit resources. Therefore, accelerating the liberation of prolonged weaning patients from MV improves patient care and could yield significant economic benefits.
Which weaning strategy is “best” is controversial. Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV+) has many aspects that are theoretically beneficial as part of a difficult weaning protocol.
Single center case series of patients undergoing a PAV+ protocolized wean from an 18 bed mixed medical/surgical/ trauma Canadian tertiary care ICU.
Over the 39 month (3.25 year) period 46 patients underwent a slow wean, 40 of whom spent greater than 70% of their time weaning in a PAV+ mode. During weaning from MV there were 4/40 (10%) deaths in the PAV+ group, despite a high admitting APACHE II score. All patients in the PAV+ group who survived were successfully weaned from MV over a median of 13.3 (9.2-20) days.
Although this study was conducted in an acute hospital context that is significantly different from Long Term Acute Care Hospitals, it raises the possibility that a PAV+ weaning protocol could be superior to PSV or t piece weaning strategies. Further studies are needed.
Study funded by grant from Covidien.
Esteban A, et al: Evolution of MV in response to clinical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 177: 170-177. 10.1164/rccm.200706-893OC.
Boles JM, et al: Weaning from MV. Eur Respir J. 2007, 29: 1033-1056. 10.1183/09031936.00010206.
Rose L, Fraser IM: Patient characteristics and outcomes of a provincial prolonged-ventilation weaning centre: A retrospective cohort study. Can Respir J. 2012, 19: 216-220.
Schonhofer B, et al: Survival of mechanically ventilated patients admitted to a specialised weaning centre. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28: 908-916. 10.1007/s00134-002-1287-5.
Jubran A, et al: Effect of pressure support vs unassisted breathing through a tracheostomy collar on weaning duration in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2013, 309: 671-677. 10.1001/jama.2013.159.
Pilcher DV, et al: Outcomes, cost and long term survival of patients referred to a regional weaning centre. Thorax. 2005, 60: 187-192. 10.1136/thx.2004.026500.
Scheinhorn DJ, et al: Liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin. 2002, 18: 569-595. 10.1016/S0749-0704(02)00016-7.
Penuelas OF, et al: Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from MV. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 184: 430-437. 10.1164/rccm.201011-1887OC.
About this article
Cite this article
Rohrs, E., Reynolds, S. & Zurba, J. A case series of a pav+ weaning protocol in an acute care environment demonstrating an absence of weaning failure. ICMx 3, A1008 (2015) doi:10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A1008
- Mechanical Ventilation
- Acute Care Hospital
- Critical Care Unit
- Assist Ventilation
- Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation