Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Use of Decompressive Craniectomy in Tbi Patients in a London Major Trauma Centre

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20153 (Suppl 1) :A489

https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A489

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Neurological Outcome
  • Cerebral Oedema
  • Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction

Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI) is a serious health problem resulting in 1x106 Emergency admissions per annum in the UK [[1]].39% of patients with severe TBI, or GCS less than 8, die and 60% survive with unfavourable outcomes [[2]].The aim of TBI management is to minimise secondary brain injury from cerebral oedema to maintain brain oxygen delivery, which may be achieved via medical or surgical management, latest by using decompressive craniectomy (DC) in an attempt to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP).However, no current guidelines on its use have been published and its use remains controversial [[3]].

Objectives

Primarily, to describe the incidence and indication for DC in a Major Trauma Tertiary Centre.Secondly, to further evaluate ICU and in-hospital mortality rates in those patients treated medically vs those who were decompressed.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the following data in all TBI patients admitted to our institution over a 3yr period from July 2011-July 2014:gender, age, APACHE score, presenting GCS. For those patients who received DC, we recorded the indication to proceed to surgery. ICU and Hospital mortality was recorded in all patients. Glasgow Outcome Score was recorded in all that was documented.

Descriptive statistics were used to report data.

Results

Over the3 year period,481 patients were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of TBI.Demographic data is shown on Table 1. Forty-seven patients (9.77%) received DC. in 25(53.19%),decision was based on initial scan and examination and in 22(46.81%) on ICP refractory to medical managementICU mortality was 25.53% of those who got DC compared to 12.89% of all patients medically treated and both ICU and Hospital mortality were higher in patients who received DC.Unfortunately, only 47 patients(9.8%) had a documented GOS.
Table 1

Patient demographics.

Gender

Male 370 (76.92%) Female 111 (23.07%)

Age (yrs)

46.8

APACHE Score

15.28

First GCS documented

15 - 13: 107 (22.25%) 12 - 9: 101 (20.99%) ≤ 8: 267 (55.51%) Not recorded: 6 (1.25%)

Conclusions

Use of DC in our institution is in keeping with current published data [[4, 5]]. Both ICU and hospital mortality were higher in patients who received DC than those medically treated. Although this may be attributed the former being more severely injured, we think that further studies need to be done.Unfortunately, the lack of documented data on GOS rendered us unable to analyse this feature of management.As a TBI follow-up clinic has been set up in our trust, we hope to study the effect of DC on neurological outcome in the near future.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals, Anaesthetics & Intensive Care, Norwich, United Kingdom
(2)
King's College Hospital, Critical Care, London, United Kingdom

References

  1. Li L, Timofeev I, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson PJ: the Surgical Approach to the Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure After Traumatic Brain Injury. Anesth Analg. 2010, 111 (3): 736-748. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e75cd1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rosenfield JV, Maas AI, Bragge P, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Manley GT, Gruen RL: Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 2011, 380 (9847): 1088-1098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad FU, Bullock R, Bullock R: Decompressive craniectomy for severe head injury. World Neurosurg. 2011, 75 (3-4): 451-453. 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.12.042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nirula R, Millar D, Greene T, McFadden M, Shah L, Scalea TM, et al: Decompressive craniectomy or medical management for refractory intracranial hypertension: an AAST-MIT propensity score analysis. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 76 (4): 944-952. 10.1097/TA.0000000000000194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper J, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D'Urso P, et al: Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364 (16): 1493-1502. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102077.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lopez Soto et al.; 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement