- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Readmission costs related to intensive care after cardiac surgery. analysis of risk factors and costs within six months after discharge using an administrative registry
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental volume 3, Article number: A65 (2015)
Introduction
Prolonged stay in intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery may increase the long-term risk of readmission. Preoperative risk factors, surgical complications, infections and organ failure may need specific intensive support, increasing costs of reimbursement mainly for ICU interventions. Readmission costs over months after discharge may be a dependant of the need of intensive care.
Objectives
We analyzed the impact of ICU interventions and patients´ conditions on readmission risk and on global costs of reimbursement from the National health service with DRG methodology and assessed the impact of ICU on global costs for complicated cardiac surgery patients.
Methods
We selected 2067 patients who were admitted to ICUs after cardiac surgery in Regione Piemonte, Italy, in 2009 and analyzed all administrative data listing diagnosis and procedures according to ICD-9CM definitions. Known risk factors for complications and surgical events were selected as ICD-9CM codes. Specific ICU procedures were included if they had impact in DRG calculation. Hospital history was followed for six months after discharge and costs of new admissions were related to selected codes and conditions at the first intervention. We used hazard models and regression analysis to identify ICD9-CM codes that are predictors of readmission and their impact on reimbursement costs, with regard to ICU events.
Results
528 out of 2067 (25,54%) patients had in total 877 readmissions. In this population hospital length of stay, tracheostomy, heart or kidney failure, infection and the use of IABP or ECMO are strong risk factors for readmission. Tracheostomy accounts for the major increase of costs as DRG consider it an indicator for extensive use of ICU resources. Shock and prolonged mechanical ventilation are inversely related to increased risk of readmission, but they require additional significant expenditure. Some negative findings on the risk of readmission may be explained with increased mortality rate in those patients. Full results are shown in Tables 1-3.
Conclusions
The need of ICU stay and procedures after cardiac surgery may significantly increase the risk of readmission and of reimbursement fee. The ICD-9CM coding system for administrative purposes might be a reliable indicator for the actual clinical risk described in existing literature and predict an increase of expenditure. Health systems should consider ICU costs in allocating resources for cardiac surgery.
References
Brewer R, et al: Morbidity but not mortality is decreased after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014, 97 (3): 831-10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.062. Mar
Price JD, et al: Risk analysis for readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery: developing a strategy to reduce readmissions. J Am Coll Surg. 2013, 216 (3): 412-9. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.009. Mar
Hannan EL, et al: 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011, 4 (5): 569-76. 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.010. May
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi Zadra, A., Caruso, E. Readmission costs related to intensive care after cardiac surgery. analysis of risk factors and costs within six months after discharge using an administrative registry. ICMx 3 (Suppl 1), A65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A65
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A65