Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

A five year audit of ventilator-associated pneumonia: trends, organisms, antibiotic therapy and admission specialties

Introduction

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs greater than 48 hours following endotracheal intubation and is a clinical diagnosis with no gold standard diagnostic criterion. The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) is a tool used to aid diagnosis and comprises a clinical score of 0-12 based on 6 variables: body temperature, leukocyte count, volume and character of tracheal secretions, arterial oxygenation, chest radiograph findings and results of culture of tracheal aspirates. A score of ≥ 6 has been shown to correlate with the presence of VAP with high sensitivity although low specificity [1]

Objectives

The aim of this audit was to use the CPIS to screen all patients ventilated in our institution over the past five years for VAP and look at trends in VAP rates over time. We also reviewed all patients diagnosed with VAP to assess causative organisms, antibiotic treatments and admission specialty.

Methods

We used our electronic patient records to generate a CPIS comprising temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, microbiology results and PaO2/FiO2 ratio for each patient ventilator day from September 2009-August 2014. Any patient with an admission diagnosis of pneumonia was excluded. Any patient with a CPIS ≥ 4 after the first 48 hours of ventilation had their chest radiographs reviewed and scored. Patients with a score of ≥ 6 then had their electronic patient record reviewed to identify a diagnosis of either VAP or other condition.

Results

There were 118 potential episodes of VAP identified using a CPIS ≥ 6 in patients admitted over a five year period. Review of the clinical records demonstrated 64 episodes of VAP and 54 episodes where another source of sepsis or indication for antibiotic therapy was identified. This correlates with a specificity of 54%.

Figure 1 shows a reduction in VAP rate over time.

Figure 1
figure1

VAP rate over time.

Of all patients diagnosed with VAP there were a high percentage from certain specialties: Trauma 27%, Cardiac 18% and Vascular 17% of patients. The relative percentage of patients admitted from these specialties to our ICU in this period was 5%, 6% and 4% respectively.

Figure 2 shows the sputum culture results over time and that peak VAP rates correlate with negative cultures.

Figure 2
figure2

Tracheal aspirate results over time.

Figure 3 shows the relative usage of antibiotics. The majority of patients received Tazocin (Piperacillin and Tazobactam).

Figure 3
figure3

Antibiotic treatment of VAP.

Conclusions

The specificity of the use of a CPIS ≥ 6 in the identification of VAP of 54 % in our audit is similar to that previously described [1]. VAP rates have reduced over time and peaks may be due to over diagnosis. The organisms identified were sensitive to the antibiotics initiated given local resistance patterns. Patient with preceding collapse were more likely to be diagnosed with VAP.

References

  1. 1.

    Luyt CE, Chastre J, Fagon JY: Value of the clinical pulmonary infection score for the identification and management of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2004, 30: 844-852. 10.1007/s00134-003-2125-0.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to F Baldwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Chest Radiograph
  • Endotracheal Intubation
  • Piperacillin
  • Electronic Patient Record
  • Sputum Culture