Skip to main content

Advertisement

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Exploring challenges of rcts in the emergency and critical care setting

Article metrics

  • 242 Accesses

Introduction

Approximately 50% of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fail to recruit to time and target. RCTs in the emergency and critical care settings pose additional challenges including time of presentation of potentially eligible patients and the time required to formally recruit patients.

Objectives

To describe the screening and recruitment patterns in RCTs in an emergency/critical care setting in the National Health Service (NHS) in England and to explore the impact that time taken to consent patients may have on the delivery of an early intervention.

Methods

We recently completed two large multicentre RCTs in the emergency and critical care setting. Both RCTs were evaluating the delivery of an early intervention - early, goal-directed therapy (a resuscitation protocol) (n=1260 patients in 56 sites)[1] and early nutritional support (n=2400 patients in 33 sites)[2]. As well as collecting data for the evaluation, we also collected data around screening, recruitment and timing.

Results

In both trials, due to the emergency/critical care setting, recruitment rates were lower - with eligible patients missed - at nights and at weekends with an absence of study “delegated” staff available often cited as the reason. In both trials, 81% of patients were recruited Monday to Friday 08:00 to 19:59. In the trial on resuscitation, the time taken to formally recruit patients impacted on the early nature of the intervention (time from meeting the inclusion criteria to randomisation was on average 1.1 hours).

Conclusions

Until research infrastructure can be delivered 24/7 in the NHS in England, RCTs in the emergency and critical care setting will struggle to deliver to time and target. The use of deferred consenting procedures for time-sensitive interventions warrants further debate.

Grant Acknowledgment

Both RCTs were funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (07/37/47; 07/52/03).

References

  1. 1.

    Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, et al: Trial of Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. The New England journal of medicine. 2015

  2. 2.

    Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, Bear DE, Segaran E, Beale R, et al: Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2014, 371 (18): 1673-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa1409860.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to P Mouncey.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mouncey, P., Power, S., Harrison, D. et al. Exploring challenges of rcts in the emergency and critical care setting. ICMx 3, A765 (2015) doi:10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A765

Download citation

Keywords

  • Care Setting
  • Eligible Patient
  • National Health Service
  • Technology Assessment
  • Health Technology Assessment