Skip to main content

Advertisement

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle mass and strength in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery (catastim 2)

Article metrics

  • 384 Accesses

Introduction

Intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) affects 24-77% of patients with an ICU stay longer than one week. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a feasible therapy for neuromuscular activation in sedated patients. The effect of NMES on muscle mass and strength is unclear: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) either showed no effect or beneficial effects [1]. To date, no RCT assessed the effects of NMES in a homogenous cardiothoracic surgery patient population.

Objectives

The objective was to investigate whether early NMES would be effective in preventing loss of muscle mass and strength in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery.

Methods

The prospective RCT Catastim 2 included 54 patients (27 in the NMES group and 27 in the control group). In the intervention group, the anterior muscles of both thighs were electrically stimulated from the first postoperative day until ICU discharge for a maximum of 14 days. In the control group, the electrodes were applied, connected to the stimulator, but no electricity was delivered. Measurement of muscle layer thickness (MLT) of the anterior muscles of the thigh using two-dimensional B-mode ultrasound was assessed every other day from postoperative day 1 to ICU discharge and at hospital discharge. Muscle strength was evaluated daily in all joints of the upper and lower extremities using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale from postoperative day 1 to ICU discharge and at hospital discharge. The effect of NMES on MLT and MRC were each analyzed in a linear mixed model.

Results

Mean MLT decreased by 0.07 cm [95% CI, -0.08 to - 0.05 cm] per day (P < .001). NMES had no significant effect on MLT (P > .05).

Mean MRC score depended on the day. Moreover there was a significant interaction between NMES and day (P < .001): The more advanced the day was, the higher the mean MRC score in the NMES group was (Table 1)

Table 1 Mean MRC score (271 observations).

Conclusions

In this RCT, NMES had no overall effect but a progressively increasing effect with the duration of NMES. This indicates that NMES helps to regain muscle strength only when applied for a sufficient number of days.

References

  1. 1.

    Parry Selina M, et al: Electrical Muscle Stimulation in the Intensive Care SETTING. A Systematic Review*. Critical care medicine. 2013, 41 (10): 2406-2418. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182923642.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, A., Winkler, A., Spiegl, M. et al. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle mass and strength in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery (catastim 2). ICMx 3, A818 (2015) doi:10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A818

Download citation

Keywords

  • Randomized Control Trial
  • Muscle Strength
  • Muscle Mass
  • Hospital Discharge
  • Medical Research Council