Baseline observation of performance and inter-professional utilisation of institutional hospital electronic technologies to access and communicate key clinical information in a central london teaching hospital critical care unit
© Chevrier et al.; 2015
Published: 1 October 2015
Prior to implementation of a bespoke clinical information system in one of the largest critical care units in the UK, we conducted a baseline assessment of the utilisation and performance of the existing hospital electronic medical record (EMR) within critical care.
Local research ethics approval was obtained. We measured electronic system speed and accessibility (pathology results; imaging archive; PDF documents and clinical notes); conducted an inter-professional staff survey and used non-participant observation to analyse the utilisation and performance of hospital electronic systems and non-institutional resources to access and transfer key information.
Across the three general adult critical care units the mean time to access key patient data during the day-shift (outside rounding) were: laboratory values 27.4s (SD 20.2s); imaging archive 41s (SD 22.5s); PDF documents 26s (22.5s) and clinical notes (44.5s (SD 24.8s). Failure rates were 21.6%, 28.6%, 40.5% and 18.9% for these same electronic resources respectively. These speed testing data are shown in graph 1. Preliminary testing suggests that these indices of performance significantly deteriorate during the night shift and at weekends. During rounding, access times were further prolonged due to non-availability of work stations due to numbers of staff using electronic resources.
Barriers to using the hospital electronic systems were identified as lack of hardware; speed and access to software/institutional electronic resources; reliability of hardware (printers, mobile computer batteries, Wifi reliability, power socket availability); departmental use of paper-based ICU medical notes; and reliability of software (permissions/IT activation/update/corruption).
The inter-professional team used a mixture of ad-hoc (paper towels, scrap paper) and semi-formalised (posters, laminates, pre-printed proformas) paper resources in conjunction with personal hand-held devices to circumvent institutional system barriers. The internet was accessed via hand-held personal devices rather than trust systems in 88.2% of access attempts by doctors.
- Weiss CH, et al: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 184: 680-686. 10.1164/rccm.201101-0037OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fraenkel DJ, et al: Crit Care Med. 2003, 31: 120-5. 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weiss CH, et al: Crit Care Med. 2013, 41: 2563-9. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298291a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.