Skip to main content

Advertisement

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Impact of a multifaceted intervention on the incidence of pressure ulcers in a medical-surgical icu. a before-after study

Introduction

Quality management to improve healthcare processes is a priority in the ICU. In a previous study, we detected a high incidence of Pressure Ulcers (PUs) including a notable amount of advanced-grade PUs.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary improvement program to reduce and manage PUs in critical care patients.

Methods

Quasi-experimental before-after study in a 14-bed medical-surgical ICU in Argentina. Consecutive patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) >3 days, over a pre- and a post-intervention (Pre-I and Post-I) period were included. In each period, we recorded: epidemiological variables, reason for admission, severity-of-illness score on admission (APACHE II and SOFA24), duration of MV and ICU stay, nurse-to-patient ratio and ICU mortality.

Interventions

A "Process Improvement" team was formed, comprised of nurses, dermatologists and intensivists. The team designed a multifaceted intervention consisting of educational sessions, prevention and monitoring PU checklist, a telemedicine tool (WhatsApp® group) for monitoring and decision-making, and a “family prevention bundle” (participation in monitoring and hydration-massages).

Outcome measures

Performance measurement indicators (Table 1) of prevention and management of PUs were selected and calculated in the pre and post-intervention periods.

Data were analyzed according to their nature. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors related to the development of advanced-grade PUs. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

In the Pre-I and Post-I periods, 55 and 69 patients were admitted to the ICU; age 47 ± 18, 39 ± 17 (p: 0.01); APACHE II 18 ± 7, 18 ± 6 (p: 0.77); SOFA24 7 [4-9], 8 [6-10] (p: 0.06), MV-days 17 [9-46], 14 [8-34] (p: 0.49); ICU days 19 [8-47], 19.5 [11-36] (p: 0.42); nurse-to-patient ratio 1:2.5, 1:2.4 (p: 0.86), respectively. ICU mortality was 23(42%) and 24 (35%) (p: 0.42).

Pre-I and Post-I indicator performance are shown in Table 1. In the logistic regression model, duration of MV and SOFA24 were positively associated with the outcome of advanced-grade PUs (OR 1.04; CI95% 1.01-1.07 and OR 1.43; CI95% 1.14-1.79 respectively), while the multifaceted educational intervention acted as a protective factor (OR 0.04; CI95% 0.09-0.19). Adjustment and discrimination of the model were appropriate (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: 3.71 (p = 0.86); and AUCROC 0.88; CI95% 0.81-0.96).

Table 1 Pressure ulcer indicator performance

Conclusions

It was possible to implement a multifaceted educational intervention with a group composed of intensivists and nurses, along with dermatologists and the voluntary participation of patient family members. This intervention was independently associated with a reduction in advanced-grade pressure ulcers.

Author information

Correspondence to CI Loudet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Educational Session
  • Multifaceted Intervention
  • Critical Care Patient