Skip to main content

Advertisement

Volume 3 Supplement 1

ESICM LIVES 2015

Early neurocognitive rehabilitation in critically ill patients during ICU stay: a safety study

Article metrics

  • 426 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Introduction

Critical illness result in significant long-term neurocognitive impairments that may persist for years after hospital discharge [1, 2]. These sequelae impact negatively in relatives' and patients' quality of life [3]. However, neurocognitive rehabilitation rarely occurs after critical illness. The Early Neurocognitive Rehabilitation in Intensive Care-ENRIC protocol (ClinicalTrial: NCT02078206)- has been develop to apply neurocognitive stimulation in patients during ICU stay. This intervention includes neurocognitive stimulation exercises that can be performed from the patient's bed through Kinect technology and it is targeted to ameliorate neurocognitive outcomes at short-and long-term.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore if the neurocognitive stimulation during ICU stay can produce deleterious effects over physiological status.

METHOD

18 ICU participants received a 20 minutes Early Neurocognitive Rehabilitation session. Heart rate (HR), O2 saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR) were collected using BetterCare® system 20 minutes before, during and after the neurocognitive stimulation session. Safe ranges were calculated by age and sex and age in HR and RR respectively. Safe lower SpO2 limit was estimated at 90%. As safety criteria safe ranges and a change of 20% from baseline in any physiological parameter were considered.

Results

100% of the sample presented HR values within normal limits at baseline (Mean= 92.3; min-max: 62.7-120.8), during (93.2; 75.6-120.7) and after session (93.4; 83.4-118.2). SpO2 values at baseline (95.7; 91.5-99.9), during (95.4; 91.8-100) and after session (95.7; range: 92.7-100) were within normal limits in all participants. 9 participants exceeded safe RR limits at baseline (27.6; 21.4-34), maintaining this status during (27.2; 22.1-34.3) and after session (27.9; 22.4-33.5). No changes greater than 20% were observed in any case. 2 new patients exceeded safe RR limits after session (26.5; 20.8-32.2), although only 1 participant showed a change greater than 20% (21.9%). No significant pre vs. post results were observed in any physiological variable (HR, p = 0.85; SpO, p = 0.98; RR, p = 0.23).

Conclusions

Neurocognitive stimulation in patients during ICU stay did not produce clinical relevant changes in the patients' physiological status. Thus, the early neurocognitive stimulation may be considered a safety intervention for critically ill patients.

Grant Acknowledgment

Fundació La Marató TV3

References

  1. 1.

    Wolters AE, et al: Cognitive impairment after intensive care unit admission: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39 (3): 376-86. 10.1007/s00134-012-2784-9.

  2. 2.

    Wilcox ME, et al: Cognitive dysfunction in ICU patients: risk factors, predictors, and rehabilitation interventions. Crit Care Med. 2013, 41 (9 Suppl 1): S81-98.

  3. 3.

    Hopkins RO, et al: Two-year cognitive, emotional, and quality-of-life outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 171 (4): 340-347. 10.1164/rccm.200406-763OC.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to S Fernandez-Gonzalo.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandez-Gonzalo, S., Turon, M., Gomà, G. et al. Early neurocognitive rehabilitation in critically ill patients during ICU stay: a safety study. ICMx 3, A994 (2015) doi:10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A994

Download citation

Keywords

  • Heart Rate
  • Respiratory Rate
  • Critical Illness
  • Neurocognitive Impairment
  • Safety Criterion