Skip to main content

Physiologic responses to exercise in survivors of critical illness: an exploratory pilot study

Abstract

Background

ICU survivors suffer from impaired physical function and reduced exercise capacity, yet the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The goal of this exploratory pilot study was to investigate potential mechanisms of exercise limitation using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and 6-min walk testing (6MWT).

Methods

We enrolled adults aged 18 years or older who were treated for respiratory failure or shock in medical, surgical, or trauma ICUs at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN, United States). We excluded patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction, a contraindication to CPET, or the need for supplemental oxygen at rest. We performed CPET and 6MWT 6 months after ICU discharge. We measured standard CPET parameters in addition to two measures of oxygen utilization during exercise (VO2-work rate slope and VO2 recovery half-time).

Results

We recruited 14 participants. Low exercise capacity (i.e., VO2Peak < 80% predicted) was present in 11 out of 14 (79%) with a median VO2Peak of 12.6 ml/kg/min [9.6–15.1] and 6MWT distance of 294 m [240–433]. In addition to low VO2Peak, CPET findings in survivors included low oxygen uptake efficiency slope, low oxygen pulse, elevated chronotropic index, low VO2-work rate slope, and prolonged VO2 recovery half-time, indicating impaired oxygen utilization with a hyperdynamic heart rate and ventilatory response, a pattern seen in non-critically ill patients with mitochondrial myopathies. Worse VO2-work rate slope and VO2 recovery half-time were strongly correlated with worse VO2Peak and 6MWT distance, suggesting that exercise capacity was potentially limited by impaired muscle oxygen utilization.

Conclusions

These exploratory data suggest ICU survivors may suffer from impaired muscular oxygen metabolism due to mitochondrial dysfunction that impairs exercise capacity long-term. These findings should be further characterized in future studies that include direct assessments of muscle mitochondrial function in ICU survivors.

Background

Over half of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors suffer from impaired physical function, including poor exercise capacity, for months to years after their critical illness, and this impairment is not fully explained by persistent muscle weakness [1,2,3]. Importantly, reduced exercise capacity is associated with greater mortality and loss of functional independence [4, 5]. To date, studies of physical rehabilitation interventions following an ICU stay have demonstrated mixed benefit for improving physical function [6, 7]. Thus, no effective means exist to rehabilitate or restore physical function for the millions who survive critical illness worldwide each year.

An important step in developing the next generation of interventions to improve outcomes is clarifying the mechanisms that underlie the persistent impairments in physical function after critical illness. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with gas exchange measurement is the reference standard for identifying cardiopulmonary or muscular etiologies of exercise limitations and impaired physical function [1, 8, 9]. To date, few studies have applied CPET to ICU survivors. Data from these studies demonstrate significant reductions in exercise capacity, which have been variably attributed to deconditioning and/or muscle weakness [1, 10]. Nevertheless, these studies have not used measures of whole-body oxygen metabolism and utilization available with CPET, suggesting our understanding of reduced exercise capacity in ICU survivors is incomplete. Moreover, most have enrolled populations with long durations of mechanical ventilation (i.e., 14 days or more) or a single disease process, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [10,11,12]. Thus, a more robust characterization of exercise limitation in a general population of ICU survivors is needed. Identifying potential mechanisms common to critical illness that impair physical recovery would allow for further mechanistic research and potentially targeted therapies.

To address these knowledge gaps and investigate potential mechanisms of exercise limitation after critical illness, we conducted a pilot study of CPET and 6-min walk testing (6MWT) in ICU survivors without cardiac dysfunction. We aimed to characterize exercise limitations using both standard parameters and novel measures of oxygen metabolism.

Methods

Setting and participants

We enrolled adults, aged 18 years or older, who were treated for respiratory failure (defined as need for mechanical ventilation) and/or shock (defined as need for vasopressors) from medical, surgical, and trauma ICUs at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN, United States) and enrolled in the parent “Measuring Outcomes of Activity in Intensive Care” (MOSAIC) prospective, observational cohort study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03115840). For this nested cohort study, we further restricted inclusion to participants without pre-existing or newly acquired cardiac dysfunction, contraindication to CPET [9], or need for resting supplemental oxygen at the time of follow-up. We also excluded patients with a primary admission diagnosis of COVID-19. The Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board approved the protocol (IRB Number 161157).

Exercise testing

Participants completed an incremental CPET using a cycle ergometer (Lode Corival Recumbent Ergometer, Groningen, The Netherlands) with breath-by-breath gas exchange measurement (MGC Diagnostics Ultima CardioO2 metabolic cart, MGC Diagnostics, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and continuous non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and electrocardiographic monitoring at 6 months [4.5–7 months] after ICU admission. On the same day, participants also completed 6MWT using standard protocols [13].

We calculated standard CPET measures including peak oxygen consumption (VO2Peak) using methods described by Wasserman and colleagues [9]. We a priori defined reduced exercise capacity as a VO2Peak < 80% predicted for age and sex [9]. We also measured oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), an effort-independent measure of exercise capacity that reflects the relationship between oxygen utilization and total ventilation [14]. Lower OUES, in the absence of reduced cardiac output, suggests inefficient oxygen utilization necessitating greater ventilatory effort to meet oxygen demand during exercise [14, 15]. We measured two additional parameters of oxygen utilization: VO2-work rate slope [16] and VO2 recovery half-time [17, 18]. The VO2-work rate slope measures the efficiency of aerobic energy generation with increasing physical effort during incremental CPET with lower values indicating worse oxygen utilization in exercising muscle [16]. VO2 recovery half-time is the time required for oxygen consumption to decrease to half of its peak value and is a marker of oxygen-dependent energy generation in muscle [18, 19]. Longer half-times indicate less efficient oxygen utilization during mitochondrial oxidate phosphorylation, which restores high energy phosphocreatine stores in muscle that were used at the start of exercise [17].

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented using medians (interquartile range) and minimum to maximum ranges. Categorical data are presented as counts and percentages. Correlation analyses were conducted using Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis, and Fisher’s Exact Test was used to compare categorical data in participants with reduced VO2Peak versus normal VO2Peak. p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. We used STATA (Version 16.1; StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, United States) for all analyses.

Results

Between October 2019 and June 2021, including a 6-month enrollment pause due to institutional COVID-19-related restrictions on the conduct of research using CPET, we screened 89 eligible ICU survivors (Fig. 1). Of these, 30 were excluded due to medical contraindications to CPET or pre-existing cardiac disease. An additional 8 participants died after discharge, 3 withdrew from the parent study, and 9 were lost to follow-up. Thus, 39 ICU survivors were eligible for this pilot nested cohort study. Of these, 24 patients declined participation and 1 participant was consented but was lost to follow-up prior to assessment. Thus, there were 14 participants who completed CPET and 6MWT.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort diagram

At study enrollment, participants were a median age of 63, 53% were female, and had a median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 10 (8–11) at ICU admission. The most common comorbidity present was diabetes mellitus (4 out of 14, 29%) followed by chronic liver disease (3 out of 14, 21%) and chronic respiratory disease (2 out of 14, 14%). All participants required mechanical ventilation for a median of 2 days [1–3], and 6 out of 14 (43%) were treated for shock at admission (Table 1). The median ICU length of stay was 5 days (3–8).

Table 1 Cohort characteristics (N = 14)

At 6-month follow-up, the median VO2Peak was 12.6 ml/kg/min [9.6–15.1 ml/kg/min] and the median 6MWT distance was 294 m [240–433 m] (Table 2). Using our a priori defined cutoff of VO2Peak < 80% predicted [9], low exercise capacity was present in 11 out of 14 (79%). The median OUES was 65% predicted [54–73%], indicating that low exercise capacity was not related to participant effort. There were no differences between those with low VO2Peak and those with normal VO2Peak with regards to age (p = 0.68), sex (p = 0.20), shock at ICU admission (p = 0.52) or pre-ICU Duke Activity Status Index score (a measure of estimated exercise capacity, [p = 0.11]). No participants had ventilatory or gas exchange limitations to exercise nor exercise-induced ischemia. Participants did, however, have a pattern of low oxygen pulse, elevated chronotropic index, low VO2-work rate slope, and prolonged VO2 recovery half-time, indicating impaired oxygen utilization with a hyperdynamic heart rate response (Table 2), a physiologic pattern that mirrors responses seen in patients with mitochondrial myopathies [8, 15, 20]. VO2-work rate slope and VO2 recovery half-time were strongly correlated with both VO2Peak and 6MWT distance (Figs. 2 and 3), suggesting that low exercise capacity may be related to skeletal muscle oxygen utilization.

Table 2 Physiological responses to exercise at 3-month follow-up (N = 14)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation plots of oxygen utilization measures and peak oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Measures of oxygen utilization during exercise and in recovery in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) are strongly associated with peak oxygen consumption. A Demonstrates the correlation between peak oxygen consumption (VO2Peak) and VO2-work rate slope. VO2-work rate slope quantifies the change in oxygen consumption as work increases during cycle ergometry. Lower values indicate less efficient oxygen consumption and poorer aerobic metabolism (i.e., mitochondrial dysfunction). B The relationship between VO2Peak and VO2 recovery half-time. VO2 recovery half-time quantifies oxygen consumption during recovery after exercise as skeletal muscle creatine is re-phosphorylated by mitochondria via aerobic metabolism. Longer durations of VO2 recovery half-time indicate impaired oxygen utilization and slower re-phosphorylation (i.e., mitochondrial dysfunction). All correlations calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation plots of oxygen utilization measures and 6-min walk test. Measures of oxygen utilization during exercise and in recovery in CPET are strongly associated with distance walked (m) during 6-min walk test. A and B Demonstrate correlations between 6-min walk distance and VO2-work rate slope and with VO2 recovery t1/2. All correlations calculated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient

Discussion

In this exploratory study of mechanisms underlying low exercise capacity in survivors of critical illness, we used cardiopulmonary exercise testing and novel measures of muscular oxygen metabolism and found the majority had significantly reduced exercise capacity with exercise responses that paralleled those seen in those with mitochondrial myopathies [8, 20]. We also found that measures of impaired muscular oxygen metabolism correlated strongly with both VO2Peak and 6MWT, suggesting that exercise capacity in ICU survivors may be limited by oxygen utilization. These exploratory data indicate that impaired oxygen utilization due to mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to persistent impairments in physical function following ICU hospitalization.

Our findings build upon prior studies of CPET in ICU survivors. Benington and colleagues recruited 50 survivors who had been treated with mechanical ventilation for 5 days or more and performed CPET at 6 weeks after hospital discharge [10]. They showed that 56% of these survivors had reductions in VO2Peak. Because the mean respiratory exchange rate (RER) at peak exercise was less than 1, they attributed these reductions in exercise capacity to participants not reaching anaerobic threshold due to deconditioning [10]. In contrast, we conducted exercise testing at 6 months after hospitalization in a cohort of ICU survivors with a median duration of mechanical ventilation of only 2 days and found that 11 out of 14 had reduced exercise capacity. Our participants, however, achieved a median RER > 1.05, indicating that the reduced VO2Peak was not due to submaximal effort. In addition, we used an effort independent measure of exercise capacity (OUES) which was below age and sex predicted normal values in a majority of participants, suggesting that exercise limitations in our cohort were not attributable to only deconditioning. Our findings suggest that reduced exercise capacity following critical illness can be severe and persist beyond the initial recovery period, and careful evaluation of survivors with detailed CPET measurements of oxygen utilization may be valuable in characterizing exercise limitations in future studies.

Our findings also complement prior work by Van Aerde and colleagues, who recruited 313 survivors of critical illness and conducted CPET between 1 and 5 years after hospitalization. They found that 38% of survivors had impaired exercise capacity as measured by VO2Peak [1]. Because cardiac and pulmonary limitations were not present, the authors pragmatically attributed exercise limitation to a muscular etiology. Our findings extend these through our use of specific measures of muscle oxygen utilization, VO2-work rate slope and VO2 recovery half-time. We found these measures to be strongly correlated with exercise capacity measured by both CPET and 6MWT, suggesting that impairments in muscle oxygen metabolism may play a role in reduced exercise capacity in ICU survivors.

Our finding that the global pattern of exercise responses, which included impaired oxygen utilization, increased ventilation, and hyperdynamic heart rate, parallels CPET findings seen in those with mitochondrial myopathies [8, 15, 20] also contributes to existing literature regarding physical function after the ICU. Muscle mitochondrial dysfunction occurs early in critical illness and sepsis [21], and it is strongly linked to survival. Few studies, however, have evaluated mitochondrial function in ICU survivors. Dos Santos and colleagues performed muscle biopsies in 11 patients at both 7 days after ICU discharge and 6 months after critical illness [22]. They found that mitochondrial content (i.e., number of mitochondria) was reduced at 7 days after ICU discharge but had normalized by 6-month follow-up. They did not, however, measure mitochondrial function (i.e., oxidative phosphorylation). We used novel CPET measures and found impaired muscle oxygen utilization, suggesting reduced mitochondrial function may be present. Because mitochondrial function may be impaired, even in the setting of a normal number of mitochondria [23], together our findings suggest that further study of mitochondrial function using both in vitro (e.g., muscle biopsies) and in vivo (e.g., 31-phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy) techniques in survivors of critical illness is warranted.

Our preliminary findings that impaired exercise capacity may be related to impaired muscle oxygen utilization has potentially important relevance in improving physical recovery after critical illness. While prior post-ICU rehabilitation studies have predominantly utilized either self-directed exercise or protocolized exercise [7], our data suggest that future exercise rehabilitation studies could investigate novel rehabilitation approaches aimed at optimizing mitochondrial function [24] or be paired with mitochondrially targeted nutritional or pharmaceutical therapies [25, 26]. By further understanding the mechanisms by which exercise capacity remains impaired among ICU survivors, future interventions may be “metabolically tailored” to target the underlying pathophysiology that drives long-term impairments.

Our exploratory study has several strengths. We employed gold standard CPET to investigate potential mechanisms of exercise limitation and utilized novel measures of oxygen utilization not previously investigated in ICU survivors, finding that oxygen utilization is significantly associated with exercise capacity using two complementary assessments (VO2Peak and 6MWT distance). Unlike prior studies of CPET who enrolled those with a mean duration of mechanical ventilation > 15 days [25], our participants were treated with mechanical ventilation for a median of 2 days, which is more reflective of a general ICU population and acute critical illness [27] rather than a persistent or chronic critical illness cohort [28]. The short duration of mechanical ventilation also suggests that reductions in exercise capacity may occur rapidly during critical illness, a finding in need of further study.

Our pilot study should also be interpreted considering several limitations. The sample size is small, and we did not include an external control group. Nevertheless, we compared CPET and 6MWT data to widely accepted predicted normative values adjusted for age and sex, making our results exploratory. We also cannot completely rule out impairments in cardiac or microcirculatory function without invasive CPET (e.g., Swan-Ganz and/or femoral catheterization during CPET). Nevertheless, we did exclude participants with known cardiac dysfunction and the routine use of invasive CPET does not reflect clinical practice. Finally, we did not measure muscle mitochondrial function directly using muscle biopsies or other techniques, such as 31-phoshporus magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nevertheless, we applied validated CPET measures of muscular oxygen utilization that correlate with mitochondrial dysfunction in other clinical populations [20].

Conclusions

In this exploratory study of survivors of critical illness, the majority of patients had impaired exercise capacity and low impaired muscular oxygen metabolism, suggesting impaired mitochondrial function. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and should measure mitochondrial function so that underlying mechanisms of impaired exercise capacity can be better understood.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable written request.

References

  1. Van Aerde N, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y et al (2021) Aerobic exercise capacity in long-term survivors of critical illness: secondary analysis of the post-EPaNIC follow-up study. Intensive Care Med 47:1462–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E et al (2014) Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med 42:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Needham DM, Wozniak AW, Hough CL et al (2014) Risk factors for physical impairment after acute lung injury in a national, multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189:1214–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V et al (2002) Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346:793–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morey MC, Pieper CF, Cornoni-Huntley J (1998) Physical fitness and functional limitations in community-dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:715–723

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Connolly B, Salisbury L, O’Neill B, et al (2015) Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD008632

  7. Taito S, Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto Y et al (2019) Does enhanced physical rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge improve outcomes in patients who received mechanical ventilation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9:e026075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riley MS, Nicholls DP, Cooper CB (2017) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and metabolic myopathies. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14:S129–S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sietsema K et al (2015) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation: including pathophysiology and clinical applications. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benington S, McWilliams D, Eddleston J, Atkinson D (2012) Exercise testing in survivors of intensive care–is there a role for cardiopulmonary exercise testing? J Crit Care 27:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eberst G, Claudé F, Laurent L et al (2022) Result of one-year, prospective follow-up of intensive care unit survivors after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Ann Intensive Care 12:23

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joris M, Minguet P, Colson C et al (2021) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in critically ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors: evidence of a sustained exercise intolerance and hypermetabolism. Crit Care Explor 3:e0491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. T. S. Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollenberg M, Tager IB (2000) Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: an index of exercise performance and cardiopulmonary reserve requiring only submaximal exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:194–201

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhatia R, Cohen BH, McNinch LN (2021) A novel exercise testing algorithm to diagnose mitochondrial myopathy. Muscle Nerve 63:715–723

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen JE, Sue DY, Oren A, Wasserman K (1987) Relation of oxygen uptake to work rate in normal men and men with circulatory disorders. Am J Cardiol 59:669–674

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mezzani A, Agostoni P, Cohen-Solal A et al (2009) Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen-Solal A, Laperche T, Morvan D et al (1995) Prolonged kinetics of recovery of oxygen consumption after maximal graded exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Analysis with gas exchange measurements and NMR spectroscopy. Circulation 91:2924–2932

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris RC, Edwards RH, Hultman E et al (1976) The time course of phosphorylcreatine resynthesis during recovery of the quadriceps muscle in man. Pflugers Arch 367:137–142

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gimenes AC, Neder JA, Dal Corso S et al (2011) Relationship between work rate and oxygen uptake in mitochondrial myopathy during ramp-incremental exercise. Braz J Med Biol Res 44:354–360

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fredriksson K, Hammarqvist F, Strigård K et al (2006) Derangements in mitochondrial metabolism in intercostal and leg muscle of critically ill patients with sepsis-induced multiple organ failure. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291:E1044–E1050

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dos Santos C, Hussain SNA, Mathur S et al (2016) Mechanisms of chronic muscle wasting and dysfunction after an intensive care unit stay. A pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 194:821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Short KR, Bigelow ML, Kahl J et al (2005) Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5618–5623

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Memme JM, Erlich AT, Phukan G, Hood DA (2021) Exercise and mitochondrial health. J Physiol 599:803–817

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wesselink E, Koekkoek WAC, Grefte S et al (2019) Feeding mitochondria: potential role of nutritional components to improve critical illness convalescence. Clin Nutr 38:982–995

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karaa A, Haas R, Goldstein A et al (2018) Randomized dose-escalation trial of elamipretide in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy. Neurology 90:e1212–e1221

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC et al (2010) The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. Crit Care Med 38:1947–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iwashyna TJ, Hodgson CL, Pilcher D et al (2016) Timing of onset and burden of persistent critical illness in Australia and New Zealand: a retrospective, population-based, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 4:566–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The National Institutes of Health supported this study under awards K76AG054864, T32HL08773814, and UL1TR002243. Additional funding for this study was provided by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Arthur and Lisa Wheeler Critical Care Research Grant.

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Academic Affiliations, VA National Quality Scholars Program, and with resources and use of facilities at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System in Nashville, Tennessee. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, or The Ohio State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MFM and NEB had full access to all study data, take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Design and conduct of the study: MFM, NEB, EWE. Data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data: All authors. Statistical analysis: MFM, NEB. Drafting of the manuscript: MFM, NEB. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: All authors. Obtaining funding: NEB, MFM, EWE. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew F. Mart.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants in this study provided informed consent for all study procedures. This research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board approved the protocol for this study (IRB Number 161157).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors report no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mart, M.F., Ely, E.W., Tolle, J.J. et al. Physiologic responses to exercise in survivors of critical illness: an exploratory pilot study. ICMx 10, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00461-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00461-8

Keywords

  • Critical illness
  • Cardiopulmonary exercise test
  • Post intensive care syndrome