Skip to main content
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Download PDF
  • Research Articles
  • Open access
  • Published:

Circular RNAs to predict clinical outcome after cardiac arrest

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental volume 10, Article number: 41 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 09 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Cardiac arrest (CA) represents the third leading cause of death worldwide. Among patients resuscitated and admitted to hospital, death and severe neurological sequelae are frequent but difficult to predict. Blood biomarkers offer clinicians the potential to improve prognostication. Previous studies suggest that circulating non-coding RNAs constitute a reservoir of novel biomarkers. Therefore, this study aims to identify circulating circular RNAs (circRNAs) associated with clinical outcome after CA.

Results

Whole blood samples obtained 48 h after return of spontaneous circulation in 588 survivors from CA enrolled in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM) were used in this study. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing in 2 groups of 23 sex-matched patients identified 28 circRNAs associated with neurological outcome and survival. The circRNA circNFAT5 was selected for further analysis using quantitative PCR. In the TTM-trial (n = 542), circNFAT5 was upregulated in patients with poor outcome as compared to patients with good neurological outcome (p < 0.001). This increase was independent of TTM regimen and sex. The adjusted odds ratio of circNFAT5 to predict neurological outcome was 1.39 [1.07–1.83] (OR [95% confidence interval]). CircNFAT5 predicted 6-month survival with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.31 [1.13–1.52].

Conclusion

We identified circulating circRNAs associated with clinical outcome after CA, among which circNFAT5 may have potential to aid in predicting neurological outcome and survival when used in combination with established biomarkers of CA.

Introduction

Cardiac arrest (CA) remains one of the major public health burdens worldwide, causing up to 20% of deaths in Europe [1]. Furthermore, among comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit on average only 40–50% survive to hospital discharge [2]. Therefore, being able to predict the outcome of these patients would aid in delivering personalized medicine, focusing on prioritization of resources and informing relatives at an earlier stage.

Current guidelines recommend the use of multiple prognostic approaches that combine neurophysiological tests, neuroimaging and biomarker assessment to predict the outcome of patients after CA [3,4,5]. The majority of the current biomarkers are brain-enriched markers released in the bloodstream after disruption of the blood–brain barrier, such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE) [6,7,8], neurofilament light chain (Nfl) [9] and S100 [10, 11]. Although the predictive value of these biomarkers has been reported in several studies [10,11,12] they do not seem to be accurate enough, as some of them may reflect other clinical disorders independent of CA [13,14,15]. Therefore, the identification of new biomarkers with additional prognostic power to be used in combination with the already established predictive modalities could improve the prognostication of CA patients.

Given the ubiquitous roles revealed in both physiological and pathological conditions, RNAs are emerging as promising biomarker candidates [16, 17]. Particularly a class of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), called circular RNAs (circRNAs), seem to represent the optimal intrinsic characteristics to function as biomarkers [18]. CircRNAs present a closed loop-ended structure, which originates from backsplicing [19]. This structure makes this class of RNA particularly stable when compared to any other class of linear RNAs, as they are resistant to exonuclease degradation [20]. Typically, circRNAs are more than 200 nucleotides long and lack a 5′-terminal cap and 3′-terminal poly A tail [19,20,21]. They also show a high cell type and tissue specificity and are abundantly expressed in numerous evolutionarily conserved human genes [22]. In addition, circRNAs are widely distributed in body fluids, where biomarkers can easily be detected. The study of this class of RNAs is still in its infancy; however, it is becoming clear that they are relevant during disease initiation and progression [23, 24] and present some potential as disease biomarkers [25,26,27]. Furthermore, the stability, specificity, and abundant expression in body fluids of circRNAs make them particularly advantageous as biomarkers to be assessed by minimally invasive and low-cost methodologies such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) [28].

The current work represents a substudy of the Target Temperature Management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trial, whose purpose was to evaluate the beneficial effect of two different targeted temperature regimens on the outcome of patients after OHCA, 33 °C versus 36 °C [29, 30]. Here, we report the potential biomarker value of a circulating circRNA, hsa_circ_0006845 (named herein circNFAT5), in OHCA prognostication.

Methods

See Additional file 3 for additional methods.

Patients

The TTM-trial enrolled 950 unconscious adults admitted at the intensive care unit after OHCA of presumed cardiac cause. The recruitment occurred between November 11, 2010 and January 10, 2013 in 10 countries. The trial compared the effects of two targeted temperature regimens (33 °C and 36 °C) on survival until the end of the trial and 6-month neurological outcome. Neurological outcome was assessed with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A good neurological outcome was defined as patients with none or mild-to-moderate neurological damage (CPC1-2 or mRS 0–3), while a poor outcome was defined as patients with severe neurological damage, comatose or dead (CPC3-5 or mRS 4–6).

Informed consent was waived and obtained from each patient or relatives in line with the declaration of Helsinki and the legislation of each of the participating countries. The TTM-trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01020916). The details of the design, protocol, statistical analyses and results of the trial have been discussed elsewhere [29, 31, 32].

Whole blood samples were collected in PAXgene™ Blood RNA tubes (PreAnalytiX, cat n. 762,165) 48 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Following collection, the samples were stored at the Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL) in compliance with the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories Best Practices. RNA extractions were performed and quantified using accredited methods (ISO 17025:2005). Each recruiting center in the trial decided independently whether or not to participate in the biobank study. Among the patients recruited, PAXgene™ Blood RNA samples 48 h after ROSC were available for 643 patients and RNA samples for 588 patients (Additional file 3: Fig. S1).

Statistical analyses

Sigma Plot software (version 12.5) was used to perform statistical analyses. The T-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to measure the differential expression levels of circNFAT5 according to the neurological outcome, targeted temperature regimen or sex. Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the categorical characteristics of TTM patients according to their neurological outcome (good vs. poor outcome). Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables.

The neurological outcome of patients was assessed 6 months after OHCA. Patients were dichotomized as good or poor neurological outcome according to the CPC score and mRS score.

From 588 TTM patients used in this study, two sex-matched groups of 23 patients, one group with CPC1 and one with CPC5, were selected in the discovery phase for whole transcriptome RNA-seq. CircRNAs having differential expression profiles with p < 0.05 and log2-fold change > 0.5 or < − 0.5 between the good (CPC 1) and bad (CPC 5) outcome groups were selected for further validation. A logistic regression analysis assessed the association of circNFAT5 levels with 6-month neurological outcome while Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between circNFAT5 and 6-month survival.

In the logistic regression analysis, patients were dichotomized in two groups, according to their CPC score and mRS score. Patients with a CPC 1–2 or mRS 0–3 were considered as having a good neurological outcome. Patients with a CPC 3–5 or mRS 4–6 belonged to the group with a poor neurological outcome. Both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In multivariable analyses, the same clinical covariates used in previous publications [6, 33, 34] were considered: age, sex, first monitored rhythm, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), circulatory shock on admission, targeted temperature regimen, time from CA to ROSC, initial serum lactate levels and NSE levels. Missing data were imputed using missForest R package (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597). Forest plots showing the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were generated. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Hosmer and Lemeshow test were used to estimate the goodness of fit for the models. The lower AIC value, the better model fit. The Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) was used to compare models. The net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were computed to evaluate the ability of circNFAT5 to reclassify patients misclassified by a clinical model. These analyses were performed using R version 4.0.3 with the following packages: ROCR, Hmisc, rms, lmtest, matrixStats and glmtoolbox.

Cox proportional hazards regression models were used in survival analyses. We calculated the Harrell’s C-index (the concordance index) to evaluate the univariate and multivariable Cox models. We estimated the goodness of fit of the Cox models with AIC and Grønnesby and Borgan test. We compared different Cox models using LRT. The survival analysis was performed using survival, survMisc and lmtest R packages. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for circNFAT5 using the Youden index at the cut-off value of 0.55.

Results

Study flowchart

RNA extracts from whole blood samples collected in PAXgene RNA tubes and obtained 48 h after ROSC from a total of 588 patients from the TTM-trial were used in the present study (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). We first conducted a discovery phase using RNA-seq in two sex-matched groups of 23 patients from the TTM-trial. The first 2 groups of 23 patients with sufficient RNA for RNA-seq and qPCR validation were selected. The first group consisted of patients who survived and recovered without neurological sequelae at 6 months after OHCA (CPC 1), while the second group included patients who died (CPC 5) (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). Demographics and clinical characteristics of these 46 patients can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the discovery cohort
Full size table

The remaining 542 TTM patients were used in a validation phase with measurement of candidate circRNA by quantitative PCR. Therefore, in the validation phase 256 patients with CPC 3–5 and 253 patients with mRS 4–6 showed a poor neurological outcome 6 months after OHCA, while 286 with CPC 1–2 and 289 with mRS 0–3 had a good outcome (Additional file 3: Fig. S1).

Discovery phase: selection of circRNA candidates from RNA-seq data

Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing of the 46 patients enrolled in the discovery phase allowed the identification of 28 candidate circRNAs with differential expression profiles with p < 0.05 and log2-fold change > 0.5 or < − 0.5 between good (CPC 1) and poor (CPC 5) outcome groups (Table 2). Among these circRNAs, 24 were upregulated and 4 were downregulated in the CPC 5 group, as displayed by the volcano plot of Fig. 1a. These circRNAs were able to reasonably distinguish the two groups of patients as showed by the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) clustering technique (Fig. 1b). A heatmap shown in Fig. 1c displays the clusters of patients and standardized expression levels of the 28 circRNAs for each patient.

Table 2 List of 28 circRNAs selected from RNA-seq
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

RNA-seq results from the discovery study in 46 TTM-trial patients. a Volcano plot showing the differential expression of the circRNAs in the CPC5 group as magnitude of change (log2-fold change) on the X-axis versus statistical significance (-log10) on the Y-axis. Color code: red, circRNAs significantly upregulated in the CPC5 group; blue, circRNAs significantly downregulated in the CPC5 group; black, circRNAs with no significant change. b UMAP analysis showing the clustering of the patients with X1 and X2 representing the distance between samples. Color code: red, patients with CPC1; blue, patients with CPC5. c Heatmap representing the expression levels of 28 circRNAs in each of the 46 RNA-seq samples. Color code: red, higher expression; blue, lower expression

Full size image

A positive log2-fold change indicates a higher level in poor outcome patients (CPC 5) as compared to good outcome (CPC 1) patients. Abbreviation: FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads).

Pairs of divergent primers for qPCR were designed and tested for the 28 circRNAs listed in Table 1. Detectability of the circRNAs in blood samples (cut-off set at Ct value < 31) as well as amplification of the corrected product was confirmed for 5 circRNAs (Additional file 3: Fig. S2). Among these 5 circRNAs, circNFAT5 was selected for further analysis as it represented the best compromise between PCR primers efficiency (Additional file 3), expression levels in PAXgene samples, confirmed circularity, with 76% resistance to RNase R treatment (Additional file 3: Fig. S3) and confirmed product amplification by Sanger sequencing using divergent primers (Additional file 1 and Additional file 3: Fig. S4a) with the junction point present in the middle of the sequence (Additional file 3: Fig. S4b).

Validation phase: assessment of the biomarker potential of circNFAT5

Circulating levels of circNFAT5 were measured by qPCR in whole blood samples collected 48 h after ROSC in the patients of the TTM-trial not enrolled in the discovery phase (n = 542; Additional file 3: Fig. S1). 241 patients were subjected to a targeted temperature regimen of 33 °C and 301 patients were assigned to 36 °C. 134 patients treated at 33 °C and 155 treated at 36 °C showed a good neurological outcome with CPC 1–2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients are gathered in Table 3 using CPC score and Additional file 3: Table S1 using mRS score. As compared to patients in the good outcome group (CPC 1–2), patients with poor outcome (CPC 3–5) were older, had more often co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), had a higher delay between CA and ROSC, had higher levels of lactate, and had more often a shock on admission (Table 3).

Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics of TTM cohort using CPC score
Full size table

Higher levels of circNFAT5 in poor outcome patients (CPC 3–5) compared to good outcome patients (CPC 1–2) measured by qPCR (Fig. 2c) confirmed the results of the RNA-seq data (Table 1). This difference persisted when separating patients by temperature treatment at 33 °C or 36 °C (Fig. 2d, e). Targeted temperature regimen did not affect circNFAT5 levels, and males and females had comparable levels of circNFAT5 (Fig. 2a, b). These results were confirmed also when patients were dichotomized according to mRS score (Additional file 3: Fig. S5).

Fig. 2
figure 2

CircNFAT5 expression levels in 542 patients of the TTM-trial. CircNFAT5 levels were compared according to the temperature regimen and regardless of the neurological outcome (a), between females and males (b), between good (CPC 1–2) and poor (CPC 3–5) neurological outcome regardless of the temperature regimen (c), and separately in patients treated at 36 °C or 33 °C (d, e). The expression levels of circNFAT5 were normalized, log2 transformed and scaled. p-values are from Mann–Whitney U test

Full size image

To assess the potential of circNFAT5 to predict the neurological outcome of patients in the TTM-trial 6 months after OHCA, we conducted univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses using both CPC score (Fig. 3) and mRS score (Additional file 3: Fig. S6) to classify patients. Consistent with previous studies in this trial, the following parameters were included in the multivariable clinical model: age, sex, first monitored rhythm, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), circulatory shock on admission, targeted temperature regimen, time from CA to ROSC, initial serum lactate levels and NSE levels at 48 h [33, 34]. As indicated in Fig. 3 and Additional file 3: Table S2, circNFAT5 was a univariate predictor of the neurological outcome and this prediction remained significant after adjustment with clinical parameters (univariate OR [95% CI]: 1.37 [1.15–1.63] and 1.39 [1.07–1.83] after adjustment). In the multivariable analysis, age, first monitored rhythm, bystander CPR and NSE levels were also independent predictors of neurological outcome (Fig. 3b and Additional file 3: Table S2). The results were also confirmed when using mRS instead of CPC as dichotomization score (Additional file 3: Fig. S6). Furthermore, correlation analyses showed no association between circNFAT5, NSE and age (Fig. 4) both considering all patients (r = 0.10 and r = 0.06, respectively) or only patients with good (r = 0.02 and r = 0.12, respectively) or poor (r = 0.05 and r = 0.09, respectively) neurological outcome.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Logistic regression models to predict 6-month neurological outcome. Forest plots showing the odds ratio (OR) with ± 95% confidence interval [95% CI] for the prediction of 6-month neurological outcome in TTM-trial patients. a Univariate logistic regression analysis. b Multivariable logistic regression analysis

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation analyses of circNFAT5 with NSE and age. Scatter plots and linear regressions showing the correlations between circNFAT5, NSE (a) and age (b). Correlations were conducted considering all patients or patients dichotomized according to neurological outcome as CPC 1–2 and CPC 3–5. The expression levels of circNFAT5 used for these analyses were normalized, log2 transformed and scaled. circNFAT5 and NSE levels were measured 48 h after OHCA. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) and p-value are indicated in each plot

Full size image

Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were then used to estimate the ability of circNFAT5 to predict 6-month survival. Kaplan–Meier survival curves generated using the Youden’s index as cut-off value indicate a higher chance of survival (p < 0.001) in patients with expression levels of circNFAT5 below 0.55 (Fig. 5a). In Cox proportional hazards models, a HR [95% CI] of 1.29 [1.14–1.46] indicated that the increase of circNFAT5 was associated with a higher risk of death at 6 months (Fig. 5b and Additional file 3: Table S3) and this association remained significant after adjustment with demographic and clinical parameters (HR [95% CI]: 1.31 [1.13–1.52]; Fig. 5c and Additional file 3: Table S3). After adjustment, age, first monitored rhythm, lactate and NSE levels were also independent predictors of 6-month survival (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Survival analyses in TTM-trial patients at 6 months. 6-month survival of TTM-trial patients using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards. a Kaplan–Meier curves using the Youden’s index as cut-off value. b Univariate Cox proportional hazards for 9 independent variables and circNFAT5. c Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Data are presented as hazards ratio (HR) with ± 95% confidence interval [95% CI] and p-values are indicated for each variable

Full size image

The incremental value of circNFAT5 to predict neurological outcome and survival was assessed using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). For neurological outcome prediction using CPC score, a decrease of AIC was observed when integrating circNFAT5 in the model (LRT p-value = 0.015; Hosmer–Lemeshow p-value < 2.22E-16). This was associated with an IDI of 0.005 (p = 0.15), a NRI of 0.27 (p = 0.001) and an AUC of 0.91 (Table 4). Similar results were obtained for neurological outcome prediction using mRS score (Additional file 3: Table S4).

Table 4 CircNFAT5 performance to predict patient outcome in TTM cohort
Full size table

CircNFAT5 was able to improve the survival model as attested by a decrease of AIC (LRT p-value = 3.91E-04; Gronnesby and Borgan p-value = 8.62E-74), and this was associated with a C-index of 0.85 (Table 4).

Discussion

The present study aimed to identify and validate the prognostic potential of circulating circRNAs after OHCA. In a discovery phase using whole transcriptome sequencing, one circRNA named circNFAT5 (hsa-circ-0006845) was identified and selected for validation of its prognostic ability in the TTM-trial. Our study showed that patients with elevated circulating levels of circNFAT5 48 h after OHCA were at higher risk of poor neurological outcome and death.

Although circRNAs are believed to have many regulatory functions within the cells [35,36,37], the mode of action of most of them including circNFAT5, remains to be determined. It is believed that different cell types can express clusters of genes in response to diverse insults [38, 39]. Therefore, the study of neighboring genes could be an indicator of the function of a specific circRNA. CircNFAT5 is located in the last coding exon of the transcription factor NFAT5 which is expressed in several tissues such as skeletal muscle, heart, brain and peripheral blood leukocytes [40,41,42,43]. Its activation after stress and its tissue distribution makes it appealing and provides a potential link between the heart, brain and leukocytes, with all three of them contributing to clinical outcome after cardiac arrest. Importantly, leukocytes are the cells where the measurements of circNFAT5 are taking place and we have observed that circNFAT5 was expressed in lymphocytes and monocytes but was not detectable in serum (Additional file 2). Additionally, several studies have previously reported that NFAT5 plays a key role in inflammatory processes of pathologies associated with cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus [44,45,46,47]. Therefore, it would be interesting to investigate a hypothetical involvement of circNFAT5 in inflammatory pathways associated with CA and its clinical outcome and sequelae, in relationship with NFAT5. In addition to this, we observed a low correlation between circNFAT5 and NSE levels (Fig. 4) which suggests an involvement of circNFAT5 in processes occurring after OHCA other than brain injury. This supports the incremental prognostic potential of circNFAT5 to be used in combination with established markers of OHCA such as NSE. Although NSE or more recently discovered biomarkers such as Nfl, are good predictors of neurological outcome after CA, novel biomarkers reflecting other pathways (than neuronal death) involved in outcome after CA could provide some incremental predictive value to ensure a maximal prediction accuracy. Along with that, it would be interesting to conduct further post hoc analysis to define whether circNFAT5 can better predict the outcome of specific subpopulations of patients, such as patients with shock on admission. However, this requires larger population than the TTM cohort included in the present study. This study has the strength of being a predefined substudy of a large multicenter clinical trial on OHCA. Blood collection, processing and storage was performed homogenously in each center according to standard operating procedures implemented and validated by our central biobank. Furthermore, the measurements of circNFAT5 were conducted in a single laboratory according to pre-established protocols [25], limiting the inter-laboratory variability of sample processing. All together, these measures ensure sample quality and robustness of the results. The present study also has some limitations. Firstly, the predictive value of only one circRNA from our discovery study has been extensively tested and reported, which does not exclude the presence of other circRNAs that can aid in the prognostication of OHCA patients. Combination of several circRNAs in prediction models remains to be tested. Secondly, the cellular origin of circNFAT5 was not accurately determined and neither was the mechanism that links circNFAT5 with outcome after OHCA. Finally, circNFAT5 was measured at a single time point, 48 h after OHCA, and it is unknown whether it can be detected at an earlier stage. Despite these limitations, our study is the first to highlight the potential and unexplored biomarker ability of circRNAs for outcome prediction after OHCA and therefore represents the starting point for future biomarker and functional studies focusing on the role played by circRNAs in CA pathophysiology.

Conclusions

In the present study, elevated circulating levels of the circular RNA, circNFAT5, measured 48 h after ROSC were associated with a higher risk of poor neurological outcome and death after OHCA. The incremental predictive value of circNFAT5 may emanate from its association with other post-cardiac arrest mechanisms than neurological damage, such as inflammation. However, the exact functional association between cNFAT5 and outcome after OHCA remains to be determined.

Availability of data and materials

The circRNAs metadata in TTM can be accessed using the GEO code GSE197764.

Change history

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike Information Criterion

CA:

Cardiac arrest

cDNA:

Complementary DNA

CI:

Confidence interval

circNFAT5:

Circular NFAT5

circRNA:

Circular RNA

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CPC:

Cerebral performance category

CPR:

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

HR:

Hazard ratio

IBBL:

Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg

IDI:

Integrated discrimination improvement index

LRT:

Likelihood-ratio test

mRS:

Modified Rankin Score

ncRNA:

Non-coding RNA

NFL:

Neurofilament light chain

NRI:

Net reclassification improvement

NSE:

Neuron-specific enolase

OHCA:

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

OR:

Odds ratio

PEA:

Pulseless electrical activity

qPCR:

Quantitative PCR

RNA-seq:

RNA sequencing

ROSC:

Return of spontaneous circulation

RT:

Reverse transcription

TTM:

Target temperature management trial

VF:

Ventricular fibrillation

VT:

Ventricular tachycardia

References

  1. Wong CX, Brown A, Lau DH, Chugh SS, Albert CM, Kalman JM, Sanders P (2019) Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: global and regional perspectives. Heart Lung Circ 28:6–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grasner JT, Herlitz J, Tjelmeland IBM, Wnent J, Masterson S, Lilja G, Bein B, Bottiger BW, Rosell-Ortiz F, Nolan JP, Bossaert L, Perkins GD (2021) European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 161:61–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O’Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW (2015) Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 132:S444-464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryoo SM, Jeon SB, Sohn CH, Ahn S, Han C, Lee BK, Lee DH, Kim SH, Donnino MW, Kim WY, Korean Hypothermia Network I (2015) Predicting outcome with diffusion-weighted imaging in cardiac arrest patients receiving hypothermia therapy: multicenter retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 43:2370–2377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karapetkova M, Koenig MA, Jia X (2016) Early prognostication markers in cardiac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. Eur J Neurol 23:476–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stammet P, Collignon O, Hassager C, Wise MP, Hovdenes J, Aneman A, Horn J, Devaux Y, Erlinge D, Kjaergaard J, Gasche Y, Wanscher M, Cronberg T, Friberg H, Wetterslev J, Pellis T, Kuiper M, Gilson G, Nielsen N, Investigators TT-T (2015) Neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of death or poor neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C and 36 degrees C. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2104–2114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luescher T, Mueller J, Isenschmid C, Kalt J, Rasiah R, Tondorf T, Gamp M, Becker C, Sutter R, Tisljar K, Schuetz P, Marsch S, Hunziker S (2019) Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) improves clinical risk scores for prediction of neurological outcome and death in cardiac arrest patients: results from a prospective trial. Resuscitation 142:50–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Streitberger KJ, Leithner C, Wattenberg M, Tonner PH, Hasslacher J, Joannidis M, Pellis T, Di Luca E, Fodisch M, Krannich A, Ploner CJ, Storm C (2017) Neuron-specific enolase predicts poor outcome after cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management: a multicenter study on 1,053 patients. Crit Care Med 45:1145–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moseby-Knappe M, Mattsson N, Nielsen N, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Dankiewicz J, Dragancea I, Friberg H, Lilja G, Insel PS, Rylander C, Westhall E, Kjaergaard J, Wise MP, Hassager C, Kuiper MA, Stammet P, Wanscher MCJ, Wetterslev J, Erlinge D, Horn J, Pellis T, Cronberg T (2019) Serum neurofilament light chain for prognosis of outcome after cardiac arrest. JAMA Neurol 76:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stammet P, Dankiewicz J, Nielsen N, Fays F, Collignon O, Hassager C, Wanscher M, Unden J, Wetterslev J, Pellis T, Aneman A, Hovdenes J, Wise MP, Gilson G, Erlinge D, Horn J, Cronberg T, Kuiper M, Kjaergaard J, Gasche Y, Devaux Y, Friberg H, Target Temperature Management after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest trial i (2017) Protein S100 as outcome predictor after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C and 36 degrees C. Crit Care 21:153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleissner M, Sramko M, Kohoutek J, Kautzner J, Kettner J (2021) Serum S100 protein is a reliable predictor of brain injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:624825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rundgren M, Karlsson T, Nielsen N, Cronberg T, Johnsson P, Friberg H (2009) Neuron specific enolase and S-100B as predictors of outcome after cardiac arrest and induced hypothermia. Resuscitation 80:784–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelinka LE, Hertz H, Mauritz W, Harada N, Jafarmadar M, Albrecht M, Redl H, Bahrami S (2005) Nonspecific increase of systemic neuron-specific enolase after trauma: clinical and experimental findings. Shock 24:119–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burghuber OC, Worofka B, Schernthaner G, Vetter N, Neumann M, Dudczak R, Kuzmits R (1990) Serum neuron-specific enolase is a useful tumor marker for small cell lung cancer. Cancer 65:1386–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DeGiorgio CM, Gott PS, Rabinowicz AL, Heck CN, Smith TD, Correale JD (1996) Neuron-specific enolase, a marker of acute neuronal injury, is increased in complex partial status epilepticus. Epilepsia 37:606–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu D, Thum T (2019) RNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 16:661–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes CPC, Schroen B, Kuster GM, Robinson EL, Ford K, Squire IB, Heymans S, Martelli F, Emanueli C, Devaux Y, Action EU-CC (2020) Regulatory RNAs in heart failure. Circulation 141:313–328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Z, Yang T, Xiao J (2018) Circular RNAs: promising biomarkers for human diseases. EBioMedicine 34:267–274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, Maier L, Mackowiak SD, Gregersen LH, Munschauer M, Loewer A, Ziebold U, Landthaler M, Kocks C, le Noble F, Rajewsky N (2013) Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature 495:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Szabo L, Salzman J (2016) Detecting circular RNAs: bioinformatic and experimental challenges. Nat Rev Genet 17:679–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, Marzluff WF, Sharpless NE (2013) Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA 19:141–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeck WR, Sharpless NE (2014) Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat Biotechnol 32:453–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Aufiero S, Reckman YJ, Pinto YM, Creemers EE (2019) Circular RNAs open a new chapter in cardiovascular biology. Nat Rev Cardiol 16:503–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee ECS, Elhassan SAM, Lim GPL, Kok WH, Tan SW, Leong EN, Tan SH, Chan EWL, Bhattamisra SK, Rajendran R, Candasamy M (2019) The roles of circular RNAs in human development and diseases. Biomed Pharmacother 111:198–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vausort M, Salgado-Somoza A, Zhang L, Leszek P, Scholz M, Teren A, Burkhardt R, Thiery J, Wagner DR, Devaux Y (2016) Myocardial infarction-associated circular RNA predicting left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:1247–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salgado-Somoza A, Zhang L, Vausort M, Devaux Y (2017) The circular RNA MICRA for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 17:33–36

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Devaux Y, Creemers EE, Boon RA, Werfel S, Thum T, Engelhardt S, Dimmeler S, Squire I, Cardiolinc n (2017) Circular RNAs in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 19:701–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gratz C, Bui MLU, Thaqi G, Kirchner B, Loewe RP, Pfaffl MW (2022) Obtaining reliable RT-qPCR results in molecular diagnostics-MIQE goals and pitfalls for transcriptional biomarker discovery. Life (Basel) 12

  29. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Gasche Y, Hassager C, Horn J, Hovdenes J, Kjaergaard J, Kuiper M, Pellis T, Stammet P, Wanscher M, Wise MP, Aneman A, Al-Subaie N, Boesgaard S, Bro-Jeppesen J, Brunetti I, Bugge JF, Hingston CD, Juffermans NP, Koopmans M, Kober L, Langorgen J, Lilja G, Moller JE, Rundgren M, Rylander C, Smid O, Werer C, Winkel P, Friberg H, Investigators TTMT (2013) Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 369:2197–2206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dankiewicz J, Cronberg T, Lilja G, Jakobsen JC, Levin H, Ullen S, Rylander C, Wise MP, Oddo M, Cariou A, Belohlavek J, Hovdenes J, Saxena M, Kirkegaard H, Young PJ, Pelosi P, Storm C, Taccone FS, Joannidis M, Callaway C, Eastwood GM, Morgan MPG, Nordberg P, Erlinge D, Nichol AD, Chew MS, Hollenberg J, Thomas M, Bewley J, Sweet K, Grejs AM, Christensen S, Haenggi M, Levis A, Lundin A, During J, Schmidbauer S, Keeble TR, Karamasis GV, Schrag C, Faessler E, Smid O, Otahal M, Maggiorini M, Wendel Garcia PD, Jaubert P, Cole JM, Solar M, Borgquist O, Leithner C, Abed-Maillard S, Navarra L, Annborn M, Unden J, Brunetti I, Awad A, McGuigan P, Bjorkholt Olsen R, Cassina T, Vignon P, Langeland H, Lange T, Friberg H, Nielsen N, Investigators TTMT (2021) Hypothermia versus normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 384:2283–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, al-Subaie N, Andersson B, Bro-Jeppesen J, Bishop G, Brunetti I, Cranshaw J, Cronberg T, Edqvist K, Erlinge D, Gasche Y, Glover G, Hassager C, Horn J, Hovdenes J, Johnsson J, Kjaergaard J, Kuiper M, Langorgen J, Macken L, Martinell L, Martner P, Pellis T, Pelosi P, Petersen P, Persson S, Rundgren M, Saxena M, Svensson R, Stammet P, Thoren A, Unden J, Walden A, Wallskog J, Wanscher M, Wise MP, Wyon N, Aneman A, Friberg H (2012) Target temperature Management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest–a randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial–rationale and design. Am Heart J 163:541–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nielsen N, Winkel P, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Friberg H, Gasche Y, Hassager C, Horn J, Hovdenes J, Kjaergaard J, Kuiper M, Pellis T, Stammet P, Wanscher M, Wise MP, Aneman A, Wetterslev J (2013) Detailed statistical analysis plan for the target temperature management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trial. Trials 14:300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Devaux Y, Dankiewicz J, Salgado-Somoza A, Stammet P, Collignon O, Gilje P, Gidlof O, Zhang L, Vausort M, Hassager C, Wise MP, Kuiper M, Friberg H, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Nielsen N, for Target Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest Trial I (2016) Association of circulating MicroRNA-124-3p levels with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a substudy of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 1:305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Devaux Y, Salgado-Somoza A, Dankiewicz J, Boileau A, Stammet P, Schritz A, Zhang L, Vausort M, Gilje P, Erlinge D, Hassager C, Wise MP, Kuiper M, Friberg H, Nielsen N, investigators TT-t (2017) Incremental value of circulating MiR-122-5p to predict outcome after out of hospital cardiac arrest. Theranostics 7:2555–2564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shao T, Pan YH, Xiong XD (2021) Circular RNA: an important player with multiple facets to regulate its parental gene expression. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 23:369–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen LL (2020) The expanding regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21:475–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Qu S, Liu Z, Yang X, Zhou J, Yu H, Zhang R, Li H (2018) The emerging functions and roles of circular RNAs in cancer. Cancer Lett 414:301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ghanbarian AT, Hurst LD (2015) Neighboring genes show correlated evolution in gene expression. Mol Biol Evol 32:1748–1766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Michalak P (2008) Coexpression, coregulation, and cofunctionality of neighboring genes in eukaryotic genomes. Genomics 91:243–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Connor RS, Mills ST, Jones KA, Ho SN, Pavlath GK (2007) A combinatorial role for NFAT5 in both myoblast migration and differentiation during skeletal muscle myogenesis. J Cell Sci 120:149–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Adachi A, Takahashi T, Ogata T, Imoto-Tsubakimoto H, Nakanishi N, Ueyama T, Matsubara H (2012) NFAT5 regulates the canonical Wnt pathway and is required for cardiomyogenic differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 426:317–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Loyher ML, Mutin M, Woo SK, Kwon HM, Tappaz ML (2004) Transcription factor tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (TonEBP) which transactivates osmoprotective genes is expressed and upregulated following acute systemic hypertonicity in neurons in brain. Neuroscience 124:89–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Trama J, Lu Q, Hawley RG, Ho SN (2000) The NFAT-related protein NFATL1 (TonEBP/NFAT5) is induced upon T cell activation in a calcineurin-dependent manner. J Immunol 165:4884–4894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Machnik A, Neuhofer W, Jantsch J, Dahlmann A, Tammela T, Machura K, Park JK, Beck FX, Muller DN, Derer W, Goss J, Ziomber A, Dietsch P, Wagner H, van Rooijen N, Kurtz A, Hilgers KF, Alitalo K, Eckardt KU, Luft FC, Kerjaschki D, Titze J (2009) Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism. Nat Med 15:545–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ma P, Zha S, Shen X, Zhao Y, Li L, Yang L, Lei M, Liu W (2019) NFAT5 mediates hypertonic stress-induced atherosclerosis via activating NLRP3 inflammasome in endothelium. Cell Commun Signal 17:102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Neuhofer W (2010) Role of NFAT5 in inflammatory disorders associated with osmotic stress. Curr Genomics 11:584–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Cen L, Xing F, Xu L, Cao Y (2020) Potential role of gene regulator NFAT5 in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res 2020:6927429

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all patients of TTM-trial, their relatives and all staff at the recruiting centers. In addition, the authors would like to thank Andrew Lumley for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Research Fund of Luxembourg (grants # C14/BM/8225223 and C17/BM/11613033 to YD), the Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg, and the Heart Foundation - Daniel Wagner. FMS received a fellowship from the National Research Fund of Luxembourg for this work (grant # C17/BM/11613033). This work is also supported by independent research grants from nonprofit or governmental agencies (the Swedish Research Council [Vetenskapsrådet], Swedish Heart–Lung Foundation, Stig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation, Knutsson Foundation, Laerdal Foundation, Hans-Gabriel and Alice Trolle-Wachtmeister Foundation for Medical Research, and Regional Research Support in Region Skåne) and by governmental funding of clinical research within the Swedish National Health Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1A-B rue Edison, 1445, Strassen, Luxembourg

    Francesca M. Stefanizzi, Lu Zhang, Antonio Salgado-Somoza & Yvan Devaux

  2. Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden

    Josef Dankiewicz

  3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 1210, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Pascal Stammet

  4. Department of Cardiology B, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Christian Hassager & Jesper Kjaergaard

  5. Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK

    Matthew P. Wise

  6. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, 221 85, Malmö, Sweden

    Hans Friberg

  7. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden

    Tobias Cronberg

  8. Integrated BioBank of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Dudelange, Luxembourg

    Alexander Hundt

  9. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Helsingborg Hospital, 25187, Lund, Sweden

    Niklas Nielsen

  10. Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, 4365, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Pascal Stammet

Authors
  1. Francesca M. Stefanizzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Salgado-Somoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josef Dankiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pascal Stammet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Hassager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matthew P. Wise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hans Friberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tobias Cronberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alexander Hundt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jesper Kjaergaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Niklas Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yvan Devaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FMS carried out the molecular studies, helped with the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. LZ carried out the sequencing alignment and the statistical analyses. ASS participated in the design of the study and selection of the candidates for the molecular studies. JD, PS, CH, MPW, HF, TC, JK and NN recruited patients into the TTM-trial. AH was responsible for the storage and RNA extraction of the TTM samples at IBBL. NN was also involved in the critical review of the manuscript. YD conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvan Devaux.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial has received ethical approval from each participating country. Informed consent was obtained from each participant or relatives, according to the legislation in each country. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01020916). Czeck Republic: Ethics committee of the General University Hospital of Prague, c/j 193-11 S 17.2.2011. Denmark: De vitenskabsetiske Komiteer i Region Hovedstaden, H-1-2010-059. Italy: Comitato Etico Indipendente, Hospedaliera S Maria degli Angeli Pordenone, No 9. Luxembourg: Comité National d’Ethique de Recherche CNER No 201007/05 Ver 1.0. The Netherlands: Medisch Etische Toetsingscommissie MEC 10/107 # 10.17.0921. Norway: Regional komité for medisinsk och helsefaglig forskningsetikk Sør-øst C Ref 2010/384. Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board Lund, Protocol 2009/6 Dnr 2009/324 (TTM-Trial). Switzerland: Comité d’Ethique de Recherche CER 10-254 (NAC 10-088). United Kingdom: Cardiff and Vale Research Review Service, Project ID 10/AIC/4927, Research Ethics Committee for Wales: 10/MRE09/41.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Sequencing results of the five candidate circRNAs.

Additional file 2.

Expression profiles of circNFAT5 in different blood compartments from samples of 3 volunteers.

Additional file 3.

Supplemental methods and results.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stefanizzi, F.M., Zhang, L., Salgado-Somoza, A. et al. Circular RNAs to predict clinical outcome after cardiac arrest. ICMx 10, 41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00470-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-022-00470-7

Keywords