Skip to main content

Application of non-invasive ICP waveform analysis in acute brain injury: Intracranial Compliance Scale

Dear editor,

Various non-invasive monitoring techniques have been developed in recent years seeking to minimize the burden that repeated imaging and invasive procedures may inflict on the journey of patients with acute brain injuries (ABI). Furthermore, the combination of these methods may theoretically enhance their predictive value for functional outcomes, as well as the detection of alterations in intracranial compliance (ICC) and intracranial hypertension [1].

One such emerging technique is the monitoring of ICC based on intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) parameters [2,3,4]. ICC impairment has been linked to both elevations in the P2/P1 ratio (namely, a tidal peak (P2) amplitude taller than the upstroke peak (P1) amplitude on the ICPW), and to prolongations of the time interval from pulse triggering until maximum amplitude on the ICPW is reached (time-to-peak [TTP], Additional file 1: Figure S1) [4].

In the current investigation, we report our preliminary experience with a black box algorithm that derives a composite index of ICC (Intracranial Compliance Scale—ICS) from non-invasive ICP waveform surrogates. Our primary aim was to evaluate the ICS ability to detect elevations in ICP. Secondarily, we sought out to correlate ICS with early in-hospital mortality (i.e., 7 days) since this time-period correlated best with deaths related to intracranial hypertension in our cohort.

In the present report, we revisited data from 72 patients with ABI. The inclusion criteria were ABI in need of invasive ICP monitoring. Included patients were assessed within the first 5 days following hospital admission with a skull deformation extensometer (Brain4care Corp, São Carlos, Brazil), able to register the non-invasive ICPW [5]. Therefore, ICP values were correlated with non-invasive ICPW parameters (P2/P1 ratio and TTP) [4, 5]. This prospective monocentric case series complied with the STROBE guidelines for observational studies and received local ethics committee approval. More detailed methodological, clinical, and demographic data are presented elsewhere [5]. Unfavorable outcome was defined as early in-hospital mortality, whereas patients still alive at the 7-day mark were considered favorable. As previously published, admission Glasgow Coma Scale, and disease severity scores (Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3) did not differ between groups. However, intracranial pressure was significantly higher among patients with early in-hospital mortality [5].

The ICS algorithm was based on a progressive 4-point score (Anaconda package coded in Pycharm, available at https://www.jetbrains.com). ICS score 0 was associated with a negative predictive value of 100%, whereas ICS score 3 held a positive predictive value of 100% (Additional file 2: Table S1) for ICC impairment. Compared to ICPW individual parameters P2/P1 ratio and TTP, ICS increased the area under the receiving operator curve and reduced the confidence interval to detect patients with intracranial hypertension (Fig. 1). Notably, no early death patients had an ICS score of 0, whereas none of the survivors had an ICS score of 3 (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Area under receiver operator curve (AUROC) analysis of P2/P1 ratio, TTP and ICS to intracranial hypertension detection (left) and death prediction (right). ICP: intracranial pressure, ICS: Intracranial Compliance Scale, TTP: time-to peak. AUROC analysis—J Hopkins Web Tool (Johns Hopkins University. Available from: http://www.jrocfit.org.)

Our preliminary results suggest that the ICS is a reliable tool for the detection of ICC alterations. Furthermore, it had better overall performance than individual analysis of ICPW peak amplitudes or time intervals for the prediction of the pre-specified outcome measures. Since the ICS can be calculated continuously and automatically in real time at the bedside, translation to medical management of patients with ABI can be achieved seamlessly. Given limitations related to sample size, a multi-center clinical cohort validation study seems warranted.

References

  1. Robba C, Frigieri G, Brasil S, Taccone FS (2022) Early prognostic value of non-invasive intracranial pressure methods in brain-injured patients. Intensive Care Med 23:78

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brasil S, Solla DJF, Nogueira RdC, Teixeira MJ, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WdS (2021) A novel noninvasive technique for intracranial pressure waveform monitoring in critical care. J Person Med 11:1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Moraes FM, Rocha E, Barros FCD, Freitas FGR, Miranda M, Valiente RA, de Andrade JBC, Neto F, Silva GS (2022) Waveform morphology as a surrogate for ICP monitoring: a comparison between an invasive and a noninvasive method. Neurocrit Careb 37:219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brasil S (2022) Intracranial pressure pulse morphology: the missing link? Intensive Care Med 48:1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brasil S, Frigieri G, Taccone FS, Robba C, Solla DJF, de Carvalho NR, Yoshikawa MH, Teixeira MJ, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WS (2022) Noninvasive intracranial pressure waveforms for estimation of intracranial hypertension and outcome prediction in acute brain-injured patients. J Clin Monit Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00941-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Trial registration NCT03144219, Registered 01 May 2017 Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03144219

Funding

None. Brain4care provided system for data collection, exclusively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GF conception, statistical analysis and wrote manuscript; CB, FMS and JG revised manuscript; SB collected data and wrote manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sérgio Brasil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethics approval (IRB 66721217.0.0000.0068) and participants give consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The authors give consent for publication.

Competing interests

Gustavo Frigieri is co-founder and scientific director of brain4care. Sérgio Brasil is a member of brain4care’s scientific board. The other authors have no COI to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplemental figure 1. Intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) parameters based on peak amplitudes and time interval. Morphology examples of standard and impaired ICPW. Amp: amplitude, P1: upstroke peak, P2: tidal peak, TTP: time to peak.

Additional file 2.

Supplemental table 1. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiving operator curve (accuracy), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) analysis for TTP, P2/P1 and ICS for the detection of intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥ 20mmHg). ICS: intracranial compliance scale, TTP: time-to-peak. Statistical analysis using Scikit package, Python 3.7.

Additional file 3.

Supplemental figure 3. TTP, P2/P1 ratio and ICS scatterplots to intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥ 20 mmHg, below) and short-term outcomes (above). ICS: intracranial compliance scale, FO: favorable outcome (survivors), UO: unfavorable outcome (death), TTP: time-to-peak. Boxplot and Anova analysis calculated with algorithms Python 3.7.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frigieri, G., Robba, C., Machado, F.S. et al. Application of non-invasive ICP waveform analysis in acute brain injury: Intracranial Compliance Scale. ICMx 11, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00492-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00492-9