Skip to main content
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Download PDF
  • Research Articles
  • Open access
  • Published:

The impact of hypovolemia and PEEP on recirculation in venovenous ECMO: an experimental porcine model

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental volume 12, Article number: 51 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recirculation is a common problem in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and may limit the effect of ECMO treatment due to less efficient blood oxygenation or unfavorable ECMO and ventilator settings. The impact of hypovolemia and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on recirculation is unclear and poorly described in guidelines, despite clinical importance. The aim of this study was to investigate how hypovolemia, autotransfusion and PEEP affect recirculation in comparison to ECMO cannula distance and circuit flow.

Methods

In anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (n = 6) on VV ECMO, we measured recirculation fraction (RF), changes in recirculation fraction (∆RF), hemodynamics and ECMO circuit pressures during alterations in PEEP (5 cmH2O vs 15 cmH2O), ECMO flow (3.5 L/min vs 5.0 L/min), cannula distance (10–14 cm vs 20–26 cm intravascular distance), hypovolemia (1000 mL blood loss) and autotransfusion (1000 mL blood transfusion).

Results

Recirculation increased during hypovolemia (median ∆RF 43%), high PEEP (∆RF 28% and 12% with long and short cannula distance, respectively), high ECMO flow (∆RF 49% and 28% with long and short cannula distance, respectively) and with short cannula distance (∆RF 16%). Recirculation decreased after autotransfusion (∆RF − 45%).

Conclusions

In the present animal study, hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion were important determinants of recirculation. The alterations were comparable to other well-known factors, such as ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance. Interestingly, hypovolemia increased recirculation without significant change in ECMO drainage pressure, whereas high PEEP increased recirculation with less negative ECMO drainage pressure. Autotransfusion decreased recirculation. The findings are interesting for clinical studies.

Introduction

Recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is a common phenomenon in which oxygenated blood from the return cannula is withdrawn by the drainage cannula without entering the patient’s systemic circulation. Recirculation might limit the effect of ECMO treatment due to less efficient patient oxygenation and/or unfavorable ECMO and ventilator settings, including excessive ECMO flow and high airway pressures [1]. Thus, avoiding unnecessary recirculation is important, even when patient oxygenation is adequate.

ECMO is the most advanced treatment option for critical heart- and lung failure in patients not responding to conventional intensive care. Safe and effective treatment presents difficult tradeoffs. Transfusion and fluid resuscitation may be necessary to control bleeding and hypovolemia [2], while positive fluid balance may increase mortality [3,4,5]. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) contributes to lung protection in severe respiratory failure but increases intrathoracic pressure and may negatively influence patient hemodynamics [6]. High ECMO circuit flow may improve systemic arterial oxygen saturation [7], but have negative side effects such as hemolysis, inflammation, coagulation, cavitation and vasoconstriction [8, 9]. Optimal cannula positioning facilitates adequate blood flow at low ECMO pump speed. In contrast, malpositioned cannulas may increase recirculation, and cause blood vessel trauma, bleeding and blood cell damage—all potentially leading to end organ damage [10,11,12,13,14].

Several factors affect recirculation. These include cannula position, distance, size and configuration, as well as ECMO circuit flow, heart rate (HR) and native cardiac output (CO) [1, 10, 11, 15]. The impact of hypovolemia and PEEP on recirculation is still unclear and poorly described in guidelines, despite clinical importance in patients on VV ECMO [3, 4].

The aim of this animal study was to investigate and quantify how hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion affect recirculation compared to ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance.

Methods

Six healthy Noroc pigs of either sex were included in this experimental animal study. Median weight was 61.5 kg (58–67 kg). The study protocol was approved by the Norwegian National Animal Research Authority (trial registration number 24306 and 28798) and was performed in accordance with European legislation [16]. A porcine model was chosen because of the similarities to human cardiac anatomy and physiology [17]. We performed eight pilot experiments to plan the study. The experimental protocol was performed in ten animals. Recirculation measurements were obtained in six pigs. Out of ten pigs, one pig died before measurements were made. In two pigs, measurements were not available due to blood gas analyzer malfunction. In one pig, the presumed “ScvO2” was mistakenly drawn from the PA catheter, due to human error. Randomization and blinding were not applicable in this study protocol.

The pigs were subjected to fasting overnight with free access to water in an animal research facility, and premedicated by intramuscular injection of 30 mL ketamine 50 mg/mL (~ 25 mg/kg), 4 mL azaperone 40 mg/mL (~ 2.5 mg/kg) and 1 mL atropine 1 mg/mL (~ 15 μg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained with pentobarbital 4 mg/kg/h, morphine 2 mg/kg/h and midazolam 0.15 mg/kg/h. Ringer’s acetate solution was infused at 10 mL/kg/h until the start of the interventions. Total blood volume was estimated to ~ 60 mL/kg (~ 3600 mL).

Electrocardiography (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), bladder temperature, invasive arterial pressure, central venous pressure and pressures from the inflow and outflow limbs of the ECMO circuit were obtained using standard bedside monitors (Life Scope® Monitor, Nihon Kohden, Japan). Pulmonary artery (PA) pressure was measured with a pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz CCOmbo, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). All pressures were zeroed to atmospheric pressure and calibrated according to manufacturer’s specifications. Recordings were digitally transferred to Labchart Pro software (AD Instruments Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). Blood gas samples, including central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) were analyzed bedside with a standard blood gas analyzer (ABL90 Flex, Radiometer Medical ApS, Denmark).

After anesthesia induction, the animals were mechanically ventilated via a tracheostomy with tidal volume 8–10 mL/kg, respiratory rate (RR) 16–18/min and inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) 0.5. After ECMO initiation and before the start of the experimental protocol, tidal volume was reduced to 4–5 mL/kg. Respiratory rate and FiO2 was not changed.

A PA catheter and a central venous line (CVL) were inserted via the internal jugular veins. The ECMO return cannula (17 French, Bio-Medicus™, Medtronic Inc., Fridley, United States) was inserted in the right external jugular vein with the cannula tip in the right atrium. The drainage cannula (23 French, Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbH, Rastatt, Germany) was inserted via the right femoral vein with the cannula tip in the inferior vena cava (IVC) and adjusted to long cannula tip distance (20–26 cm) or short cannula tip distance (10–14 cm) according to the protocol below. The cannulas were inserted percutaneously ultrasound-guided using Seldinger’s technique during fluoroscopy to ensure proper positioning (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ECMO configuration. White circles indicate sampling sites of SpreoxyO2, SpostoxyO2, ScvO2 and ECMO drainage pressure

Full size image

To prevent ECMO circuit clotting, a bolus of intravenous heparin 2 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/h to obtain an activated clotting time (ACT) of 180–200 s was given. The ECMO circuit was run in the femoro-atrial direction by a standard ECMO machine and oxygenator (Cardiohelp/HLS Set Advanced 7.0, Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbH, Rastatt, Germany). Pump speed and circuit flow were adjusted according to the protocol in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Timeline of interventions. Hemodynamics and recirculation fraction (RF) were measured with different combinations of fluid status, PEEP, ECMO flow and cannula position (arrows)

Full size image

Estimating recirculation

The recirculation fraction (RF) is the fraction of total ECMO blood-flow that circulates directly from the return cannula back into the drainage cannula without entering the patient’s systemic circulation. We used the CVL method which calculates RF based on ScvO2, preoxygenator oxygen saturation (SpreoxyO2) and postoxygenator oxygen saturation (SpostoxyO2) as follows: RF (%) = (SpreoxyO2–ScvO2)/(SpostoxyO2–ScvO2) × 100. (1) We estimated recirculation with combinations of euvolemia, hypovolemia (1000 mL, ~ 28% of total blood volume), PEEP, ECMO circuit flow and cannula distance according to the timeline in Fig. 2.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed in MATLAB (R2022b, The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA) and comparisons were made by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.

Experimental protocol

After the anesthetic and surgical preparations, we initiated ECMO treatment and measured RF according to the timeline in Fig. 2. The experimental protocol started with intravascular cannula distance 20–26 cm, ECMO flow 3.5 L/min and PEEP 5 cmH2O. After a 5-min adaptation phase, we obtained the first set of hemodynamic data, blood samples and RF estimates (Measurement 1). Then followed a 5-min stabilization phase before the next intervention.

Next, we applied PEEP 15 cmH2O and allowed a 5-min adaptation phase, before obtaining a second set of measurements (Measurement 2). The intervention was completed after resetting PEEP to 5 cmH2O and a 5-min stabilization phase.

Thereafter, we increased ECMO flow to 5.0 L/min and allowed a 5-min adaptation phase, before obtaining a third set of measurements (Measurement 3). The intervention was completed after resetting ECMO flow to 3.5 L/min and a 15-min stabilization phase.

We then repositioned the ECMO cannula and performed the same interventions (PEEP and flow) with intravascular cannula distance 10–14 cm (Measurements 4–6).

Hypovolemia was induced by gradually withdrawing 1000 mL blood in 50 min. (Measurements 7 and 8). Finally, autotransfusion was performed by infusing 1000 mL blood in 10 min. Measurements were obtained after a 5-min adaptation phase (Measurement 9).

Results

Hypovolemia induced a median increase in recirculation fraction (∆RF) of 43% (Fig. 3). HR increased, while mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) decreased. ECMO drainage pressure did not change significantly, and there was no cannula chattering (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Impact of hypovolemia, autotransfusion, PEEP, ECMO flow and cannula distance on recirculation. One pig was excluded from analysis in subplot “Flow—Long cannula distance” due to technical malfunction

Full size image
Table 1 Impact of hypovolemia, autotransfusion, PEEP, ECMO flow and cannula distance on hemodynamics
Full size table

Autotransfusion of 1000 mL blood in 10 min caused a median ∆RF of − 45% (Fig. 3). HR decreased, while MAP, CVP and MPAP increased. PaO2 did not change significantly. ECMO drainage pressure became significantly less negative (Table 1).

High PEEP (15 cmH2O) caused a median ∆RF of 28% with a long intravascular cannula distance, and a median ∆RF of 12% with a short cannula distance (Fig. 3). There were large variations, and the changes with long cannula distance were not significant. In both positions, high PEEP increased HR, CVP and MPAP, while MAP and PaO2 decreased. ECMO drainage pressure became less negative, and there was no cannula chattering (Table 1).

High ECMO flow (5.0 L/min) caused a median ∆RF of 49% with a long cannula distance, and a median ∆RF of 28% with a short cannula distance (Fig. 3). There were large variations. HR increased with short cannula distance, but not significantly with long cannula distance. There were no significant changes in MAP, CVP, MPAP or PaO2. ECMO drainage pressure became increasingly negative, but there was no cannula chattering (Table 1).

Repositioning the cannula from 20–26 cm to 10–14 cm intravascular distance caused a median ∆RF of 16% (Fig. 3). There were large variations, and only minor changes in MAP, HR, CVP, MPAP, PaO2 and ECMO drainage pressure (Tables 1, 2).

Table 2 Ventilator settings
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion were important determinants of recirculation. The alterations were comparable to other well-known factors, such as ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance. There were large variations in both recirculation and hemodynamics, supporting previous studies that report difficulties in measuring recirculation correctly (1). All findings support the notions that 1) recirculation is a multifactorial phenomenon and might increase with and without changes in drainage pressure, as well as with or without hemodynamic changes and 2) that recirculation is ultimately determined by how circulatory and respiratory physiology, as well as ECMO circuit configuration, affect blood supply to the ECMO drainage cannula [18].

Hypovolemia and autotransfusion

A likely explanation for recirculation during hypovolemia is that a lower circulating blood volume leads to IVC collapsibility, a partial occlusion of the drainage cannula side holes and drainage through the cannula tip only. The result is a functionally shorter distance between the return cannula and the drainage cannula, ultimately leading to increased recirculation. It follows from the Poiseuille equation on flow resistance that with cannula sideholes open, blood mainly drains through the proximal side holes, not the cannula tip. Thus, the draining point within the IVC may vary several centimeters solely due to IVC collapsibility [19]. In addition, hypovolemia and reduced IVC inflow probably cause more blood to be directed through the ECMO drainage cannula without passing through the patient's circulatory system and thus increases RF even with all cannula sideholes open [18, 20]. Our study suggests that recirculation increases during hypovolemia and, importantly, may do so without increasingly negative drainage pressure or cannula chattering.

PEEP

A likely explanation for the large variations in recirculation during high PEEP is related to heart–lung interactions, as cyclic variations in intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressure lead to alterations in venous supply to the IVC drainage cannula throughout the respiratory cycle [1]. These cyclic variations highlight that accurate estimation of recirculation requires a representative blood sample obtained throughout the whole respiratory cycle. This source of error may partially explain the lack of consistency in recirculation measurements in general. Specifically, high PEEP leads to increased CVP followed by an increase in IVC diameter and improved drainage from all cannula holes. Occasionally, the variations were visually apparent as alternating blood color in the drainage cannula [21]. Our study suggests that recirculation increases during high PEEP and, in contrast to recirculation during hypovolemia, may do so with less negative drainage pressure.

ECMO circuit flow

Recirculation increased during high ECMO circuit flow. Increasing ECMO pump speed leads to increasingly negative drainage pressure, IVC wall collapsibility, occlusion of the drainage cannula sideholes, drainage through the cannula tip only and likely to a functionally shorter intravascular cannula distance as described above. In addition, increased outflow from the return cannula is directed towards the drainage cannula. PaO2 was unaltered, indicating that oxygen delivery remained adequate despite increased recirculation [12].

Cannula distance

Intravascular cannula position, distance and configuration are important determinants of recirculation, but there are no clear recommendations on the ideal position or separation between the drainage cannula and the return cannula [1, 10, 18, 20, 22]. Several cannulation strategies have been proposed, including reverse ECMO flow direction (atrio-femoral or femoro-femoral), x-configurations [23], dual lumen cannula, cannulas with expanding net baskets that prevent vessel walls from collapsing around the cannula [19], right ventricular cannula [24] and pulmonary artery return cannula. All have their benefits and disadvantages, but none have so far proven superior efficiency [25].

In clinical practice, maximizing the distance between the two cannulas is widely used to reduce the possibility of recirculation [1]. However, withdrawing the drainage cannula into a smaller blood vessel may lead to cannula sidehole occlusion and a functionally shorter distance between the cannulas as described above, paradoxically not reducing recirculation.

In addition, a drainage cannula in the lower IVC mainly draws blood from the lower body, allowing poorly oxygenated blood from the SVC to enter the heart without circulating through the ECMO circuit. In the upper IVC position, blood from the SVC, IVC, and hepatic vein is probably more uniformly drained. Thus, the supply of venous blood at the drainage site appears to be more important than cannula tip proximity per se, and altogether these mechanisms may limit how far the drainage cannula may be withdrawn [18, 22]. Our data suggest that retracting the cannula too far may not reduce recirculation as effectively as expected.

Limitations

The most important limitation in this study is the CVL method to estimate recirculation. The CVL method is clinically applicable, but not always accurate as true ScvO2 is difficult to obtain in patients on VV ECMO [26]. First, because oxygen saturation in the SVC and the IVC vary substantially. Second, because the blood sample from the CVL may be partially mixed with oxygenated blood from the ECMO return cannula. Hence, ScvO2 obtained from the CVL may be falsely elevated, leading the RF equation to be negative if ScvO2 is higher than the SpreoxyO2. However, the trends we report are consistent and indicate methodological robustness regardless of absolute values and measuring method.

There are several other ways to measure the RF. A practical approach is to compare SpreoxyO2 and SpO2. Increasing SpreoxyO2 and concomitantly decreasing SpO2 are early indicators of recirculation [1]. Other methods include using systemic arterial blood gas analysis to indicate or exclude significant recirculation [27, 28]. These methods, however, do not provide quantification of the RF. Quantitative RF measuring methods are based on ScvO2, thermodilution, lithium dilution, ultrasound dilution, oxygen content and/or sweep gas adjustments [1, 10, 11, 29].

Other limitations include the small number of animals and possible interactions between the interventions. Future studies should confirm our findings with other measuring methods and investigate different cannula types, sizes and configurations.

Conclusion

In the present animal study, hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion were important determinants of recirculation. The alterations were comparable to other well-known factors, such as ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance. Interestingly, hypovolemia increased recirculation without significant change in ECMO drainage pressure and without cannula chattering. High PEEP increased recirculation with less negative ECMO drainage pressure. Autotransfusion decreased recirculation. The findings are interesting for clinical studies.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACT:

Activated clotting time

CO:

Cardiac output

CVL:

Central venous line

CVP:

Central venous pressure

ECG:

Electrocardiography

FiO2 :

Inspired oxygen fraction

HR:

Heart rate

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

MPAP:

Mean pulmonary arterial pressure

PA:

Pulmonary artery

PaO2 :

Arterial oxygen partial pressure

PEEP:

Positive end expiratory pressure

RF:

Recirculation fraction

RR:

Respiratory rate

ScvO2 :

Central venous oxygen saturation

SpostoxyO2 :

Postoxygenator oxygen saturation

SpO2 :

Peripheral oxygen saturation

SpreoxyO2 :

Preoxygenator oxygen saturation

SVC:

Superior vena cava

VV ECMO:

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

∆RF:

Changes in recirculation fraction

References

  1. Abrams D, Bacchetta M, Brodie D (2015) Recirculation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 61(2):115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, McMullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD et al (2017) Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 63(1):60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt M, Bailey M, Kelly J, Hodgson C, Cooper DJ, Scheinkestel C et al (2014) Impact of fluid balance on outcome of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 40(9):1256–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong KM, Au SY, Ng GWY, Leung AKH (2020) Positive fluid balance and mortality in adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective study. J Intensive Care Soc 21(3):210–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walter JM, Kurihara C, Corbridge TC, Bharat A (2018) Chugging in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an under-recognized driver of intravenous fluid administration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome? Heart Lung 47(4):398–400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD et al (2010) Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 303(9):865–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Togo K, Takewa Y, Katagiri N, Fujii Y, Kishimoto S, Date K et al (2015) Impact of bypass flow rate and catheter position in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on gas exchange in vivo. J Artif Organs 18:128–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehle K, Philipp A, Zeman F, Lunz D, Lubnow M, Wendel HP et al (2015) Technical-induced hemolysis in patients with respiratory failure supported with veno-venous ECMO - prevalence and risk factors. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0143527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs G, Berg N, Broman LM, Prahl WL (2018) Flow-induced platelet activation in components of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit. Sci Rep 8(1):13985

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brogan TV, Lequier L, Lorusso R, MacLaren G, Peek GJ, Extracorporeal Life Support O. Extracorporeal life support: the ELSO red book. 6th edition ed. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ELSO Ann Arbor, Michigan; 2022.

  11. Xie A, Yan TD, Forrest P (2016) Recirculation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care 36:107–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisser C, Palmér O, Sallisalmi M, Paulus M, Foltan M, Philipp A et al (2022) Recirculation in single lumen cannula venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a non-randomized bi-centric trial. Front Med 9:973240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel B, Arcaro M, Chatterjee S (2019) Bedside troubleshooting during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). J Thorac Dis 11(Suppl 14):S1698–S1707

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Montisci A, Maj G, Zangrillo A, Winterton D, Pappalardo F (2015) Management of refractory hypoxemia during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS. ASAIO J 61(3):227–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Broman M, Frenckner B, Bjällmark A, Broomé M (2015) Recirculation during veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation–a simulation study. Int J Artif Organs 38(1):23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. European Parliament CotEU. Directive 2010/63/EU of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes: Official Journal of the European Union; 2010 [76–9]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.

  17. Lelovas PP, Kostomitsopoulos NG, Xanthos TT (2014) A comparative anatomic and physiologic overview of the porcine heart. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 53(5):432–438

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker LP, Marcial AS, Brismar TB, Broman LM, Prahl WL (2022) Cannulation configuration and recirculation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Sci Rep 12(1):16379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindholm JA (2018) Cannulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Dis 10(Suppl 5):S606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Conrad SA, Wang D (2021) Evaluation of recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using computational fluid dynamics incorporating fluid-structure interaction. ASAIO J 67(8):943–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Supplemental file 1: Video showing alternating blood color in the ECMO drainage cannula.

  22. Palmér O, Palmér K, Hultman J, Broman M (2016) Cannula design and recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 62(6):737–742

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonacchi M, Harmelin G, Peris A, Sani G (2011) A novel strategy to improve systemic oxygenation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the “χ-configuration.” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(5):1197–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindstrom SJ, Mennen MT, Rosenfeldt FL, Salmonsen RF (2012) Veno-right ventricular cannulation reduces recirculation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 27(6):464–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim SY, Ahn S, Hong S-B, Chung CR, Jeon K, Lee S-M et al (2020) Clinical outcomes according to cannula configurations in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a Korean multicenter study. Ann Intensive Care 10:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Walker JL, Gelfond J, Zarzabal LA, Darling E (2009) Calculating mixed venous saturation during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 24(5):333–339

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Locker GJ, Losert H, Schellongowski P, Thalhammer F, Knapp S, Laczika KF et al (2003) Bedside exclusion of clinically significant recirculation volume during venovenous ECMO using conventional blood gas analyses. J Clin Anesth 15(6):441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sidebotham D (2011) Troubleshooting adult ECMO. J Extra Corpor Technol 43(1):P27-32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindstrom SJ, Mennen MT, Rosenfeldt FL, Salamonsen RF (2009) Quantifying recirculation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a new technique validated. Int J Artif Organs 32(12):857–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Guttorm Larsen, Ole Petter Dahl, Amrit Thiara and Alexis Hinojosa Cerda for outstanding support.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital) The study was funded by the Department of Research, Østfold Hospital Trust. Researchers were funded by their affiliated departments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway

    Lars Prag Antonsen, Andreas Espinoza, Per Steinar Halvorsen & Harald Bergan

  2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnesveien 300, 1714, Grålum, Norway

    Lars Prag Antonsen

  3. Department of Research, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnesveien 300, 1714, Grålum, Norway

    Lars Prag Antonsen

  4. The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway

    Lars Prag Antonsen, Andreas Espinoza, Per Steinar Halvorsen & Didrik Lilja

  5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Problemveien 11, 0313, Oslo, Norway

    Lars Prag Antonsen & Per Steinar Halvorsen

  6. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, 0379, Oslo, Norway

    Itai Schalit

  7. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450, Oslo, Norway

    Svein Aslak Landsverk

Authors
  1. Lars Prag Antonsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Espinoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Per Steinar Halvorsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Itai Schalit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Harald Bergan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Didrik Lilja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Svein Aslak Landsverk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: LPA, AE, PSH, IS, HB and SAL. Data acquisition: LPA, AE, PSH, IS and HB. Data analysis and manuscript drafting: LPA, AE, HB and SAL. All the authors discussed the results, reviewed the manuscript critically and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Prag Antonsen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol (trial registration number 24306 and 28798) was approved by the Norwegian National Animal Research Authority and were performed in accordance with European legislation. (European Parliament CotEU. Directive 2010/63/EU of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes: Official Journal of the European Union; 2010 [76–9]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. Video showing alternating blood color in the ECMO drainage cannula.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antonsen, L.P., Espinoza, A., Halvorsen, P.S. et al. The impact of hypovolemia and PEEP on recirculation in venovenous ECMO: an experimental porcine model. ICMx 12, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00636-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00636-5

Keywords