Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor: regarding “Predictive validity of a novel non-invasive estimation of effective shunt fraction in critically ill patients”

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 01 October 2020

The Original Article was published on 20 August 2019

To the Editor,

We read with interest the recent paper on “a novel non-invasive estimation of effective shunt fraction” (Chang et al. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (2019) 7:49) [1]. The study retrospectively investigated the validity of various oxygenation indices in predicting the change in PaO2 in response to a change in FIO2 in critically ill patients. In particular, they investigated a method to estimate shunt fraction which substitutes in the denominator of the classical shunt equation of Berggren the term for mixed venous oxygen content (CvO2) with a term derived from transposition of the direct oxygen Fick equation which incorporates the ratio of oxygen uptake rate to pulmonary blood flow (VO2/Q). Their method then assumes that VO2 and Q may be treated as constants.

We firstly observe that the equation they present (Eq. 2) is wrong. However, this error was not reproduced in the subsequent derivations in their Appendix 1 (Eqs. 3 and 4) and is unlikely to have invalidated their findings.

We further point out that the correct derivation of the non-invasive equation was originally presented by our group in 2004–5 in a prospective series of studies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [2, 3], and is as follows:

Qs/Qt = (Cc’O2 − CaO2)/(Cc’O2 − CaO2 + VO2/Qt)

We were able to demonstrate good agreement between this non-invasive shunt fraction measurement and the classical invasive shunt equation of Berggren, and also demonstrated how a measurement of non-shunt pulmonary blood flow could be used to produce the same result. This concept is particularly attractive because of the availability nowadays of minimally invasive estimates of effective pulmonary blood flow or cardiac output from a variety of technologies, without mixed venous blood sampling or right heart catheterisation. However, a key purpose of our studies was to determine the robustness of the concept to inherent imprecision in measurement of either VO2 or Q under clinical conditions.

Chang et al. showed that the non-invasive shunt estimate provides better prediction of change in PaO2 with change in FIO2 than simple tension-based oxygenation indices, in situations where shunt, VO2 and Q are assumed to be unchanged. Under such circumstances, when comparing two steady states (A and B) with the same shunt fraction at different FIO2, the above equation will indeed eliminate VO2 and Q, and may be reduced to the following:

Cc’O2A – CaO2A = Cc’O2B – CaO2B

Chang et al. have therefore demonstrated that the alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen content must remain constant, at any FIO2, if shunt fraction, VO2 and Q are unchanged. We certainly agree that this is a useful application of the non-invasive shunt principle to patient management in clinical care, but would caution that using it to estimate an absolute value for shunt fraction without measurement of VO2 or Q may lead to error in the calculation, and may be unsatisfactory for other purposes, such as physiological research.

Yours sincerely,

Philip Peyton

Luke Fletcher

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


CaO2 :

Arterial oxygen content (L/L)

Cc’O2 :

Pulmonary capillary oxygen content (L/L)

CvO2 :

Mixed venous oxygen content (L/L)

FIO2 :

Inspired oxygen concentration (%)

PaO2 :

Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (mmHg)

Q, Qt:

Cardiac output (L/min)


Pulmonary shunt fraction (%)

VO2 :

Oxygen consumption (L/min)


  1. Chang EM, Bretherick A, Drummond GB, Baillie K (2019) Predictive validity of a novel non-invasive estimation of effective shunt fraction in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 7:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peyton P, Robinson G, McCall P, Thompson B (2004) Non-invasive measurement of intrapulmonary shunting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyton P, Poustie S, Robinson G, Penny D, Thompson B (2005) Non-invasive measurement of intrapulmonary shunt during inert gas rebreathing. Physiol Meas 26(3):309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The authors declare that they are not directly or indirectly receiving funds or reimbursement for submitting this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Authors PJ Peyton and LR Fletcher have contributed equally to drafting this manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke R. Fletcher.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peyton, P.J., Fletcher, L.R. Letter to the Editor: regarding “Predictive validity of a novel non-invasive estimation of effective shunt fraction in critically ill patients”. ICMx 8, 27 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: