Skip to main content
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Download PDF
  • Research Articles
  • Open access
  • Published:

Pulmonary and intestinal microbiota dynamics during Gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental volume 9, Article number: 35 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The gut microbiome plays a protective role in the host defense against pneumonia. The composition of the lung microbiota has been shown to be predictive of clinical outcome in critically ill patients. However, the dynamics of the lung and gut microbiota composition over time during severe pneumonia remains ill defined. We used a mouse model of pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in order to follow the pathogen burden as well as the composition of the lung, tongue and fecal microbiota from local infection towards systemic spread.

Results

Already at 6 h post-inoculation with K. pneumoniae, marked changes in the lung microbiota were seen. The alpha diversity of the lung microbiota did not change throughout the infection, whereas the beta diversity did. A shift between the prominent lung microbiota members of Streptococcus and Klebsiella was seen from 12 h onwards and was most pronounced at 18 h post-inoculation (PI) which was also reflected in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines indicating severe pulmonary inflammation. Around 18 h PI, K. pneumoniae bacteremia was observed together with a systemic inflammatory response. The composition of the tongue microbiota was not affected during infection, even at 18–30 h PI when K. pneumoniae had become the dominant bacterium in the lung. Moreover, we observed differences in the gut microbiota during pulmonary infection. The gut microbiota contributed to the lung microbiota at 12 h PI, however, this decreased at a later stage of the infection.

Conclusions

At 18 h PI, K. pneumoniae was the dominant member in the lung microbiota. The lung microbiota profiles were significantly explained by the lung K. pneumoniae bacterial counts and Klebsiella and Streptococcus were correlating with the measured cytokine levels in the lung and/or blood. The oral microbiota in mice, however, was not influenced by the severity of murine pneumonia, whereas the gut microbiota was affected. This study is of significance for future studies investigating the role of the lung microbiota during pneumonia and sepsis.

Background

Lower respiratory tract infections account for more deaths than any other infectious disease [1]. Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the most common Gram-negative bacterial causes of pneumonia and is increasingly difficult to treat due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance [2, 3]. Pneumonia-induced sepsis caused by K. pneumoniae is particularly known for its associated high rates of morbidity and mortality [4,5,6].

We and others have previously described the protective role of the gut microbiota during bacterial pneumonia caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia pseudomallei as well as K. pneumoniae [7,8,9,10,11]. It has been hypothesized that gut-derived metabolites, such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) aid in the pulmonary host defense by enhancing local antimicrobial functions in innate immune effector cells [8, 12,13,14,15]. Most recent evidence highlights the role of the commensal microbes of the respiratory tract in the development of pneumonia [16]. It was long believed that healthy lungs were a sterile environment, however, during the last decade research has shown that the lung also has its own microbiome [17, 18]. Recently, Dickson et al. [19] showed that the lung microbiome at admission was predictive of clinical outcome in ICU patients. Moreover, changes in the composition of the lung microbiome have been associated with susceptibility to influenza virus infection, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as well as poor outcome in patients with ARDS [20, 21].

In healthy lungs the main source of bacteria comes from the oropharynx microbiome. The main genera of bacteria found in the lower airways are Veillonella, Prevotella, and Streptococcus. Acute and chronic lung disease can severely change the lung microbiota. Often, the microbiota shifts away from the dominant Bacteroidetes phylum towards a bacteria from the Gammaproteobacteria, which contain many of the pneumonia-causing Gram-negative pathogens [18].

The main source of microbial organisms in healthy lungs is via microaspiration, primarily from the mouth [22]. During disease the main microbial source that determines the lung microbiome can change, for example; an overgrowth of an aspirated pathogen in an infection [23] or the enrichment of gut-derived species in critical ill patients [21]. Interestingly, pulmonary inflammation can also influence the composition of the gut microbiome. We have previously observed that severe pneumonia can results in significant shifts in the gut microbiota profile in a mouse model of melioidosis [24].

The changes in the composition of the lung microbiota during pneumonia are ill defined. To our knowledge, the only study that investigated respiratory microbiome dynamics over time focused on Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in young and elderly mice [25]. In that study, differences in microbiome composition between naive young-adult and elderly mice were associated with differences in pneumococcal clearance over time. However, this study focused on pathogen acquisition and clearance with a low bacterial inoculum, all mice recovered and cleared the pathogen from the lung 28 days after inoculation.

We hypothesized that the murine lung microbiota changes during experimental K. pneumoniae pneumonia. In addition, we investigated whether the tongue can be used as a proxy to lung microbiota and whether the tongue and fecal microbiota change and influence the lung microbiota during infection. Mice were inoculated with K. pneumoniae and killed every 6 h up to 36 h post-inoculation to determine both local and systemic bacterial counts and inflammation in addition to the lung-, tongue- and gut microbiome dynamics over time (Fig. 1a). This study will aid in understanding the lung microbiota dynamics at the onset and during pneumonia as well as its relation with the gut and oral microbiota.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Organ bacterial loads and cytokine levels during K. pneumoniae infection. a Experimental design. Mice received an intranasal inoculation with 104 colony forming units (CFU) of K. pneumoniae. A group was killed every 6 h, until 36 h (n = 10–12) at which time blood, lung, tongue and feces were collected, t = 0 serves as the control group. This model becomes lethal approximately 40 h post-inoculation (a). Pulmonary (b) and blood (c) CFU at 0 to 36 h post-inoculation. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) of lung homogenate (d) and blood plasma (e) at 0 to 36 h post-inoculation. Data are shown as median, the top bar denotes at which time-points the data are significantly different from the 0-h group, the stars show the range of significance, p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****)

Full size image

Methods

Mice

Specific pathogen-free C57BL/6J male and female mice were ordered Charles River (C57BL/6J, Sulzfeld, Germany) and housed in groups in individually ventilated cages enriched with disposable rodent homes and nestling paper. All mice received the Teklad 2916 diet ad libitum for the full length of the experiment. All mice were housed at the Animal Research Institute AMC (ARIA) of our institution. They acclimatized on site for 2 weeks prior to the start of the experiments, at which time the mice were between 10 and 11 weeks of age and in good health. Mice were assessed on their welfare (incl. posture and activity) throughout their stay at the facility by both the researchers and the animal care takers.

Study design

Each experimental group consisted of 12 mice (6 males, 6 females, 84 mice total) spread across 4 cages, genders were housed separately. The number of animals was determined through sample size calculations using previous data from murine pneumonia experiments, focusing on colony forming units (CFU). The calculations were performed for 80% power and effect size 1.85, with a significance level of 0.05 [26,27,28]. Pulmonary infection was induced by intranasal inoculation of 104 CFU of K. pneumoniae serotype 2 (ATCC 43816), dissolved in 50 µl phosphate buffered saline as described [26, 27, 29]. The control group (t = 0) received only the 50 µl phosphate buffered saline. This well-established K. pneumoniae infection model leads to a marked lung infection 12 h post-inoculation. Hereafter, the infection disseminates to other body sites and becomes lethal after approximately 2 days [26, 28, 30, 31]. Inoculation was performed under a mild sedation with 2–3% isoflurane in 100% O2, to ensure that the mice would calmly breathe in the fluids. Due to logistic reasons, the mice were inoculated in two different batches: one batch consisted of t = 0, t = 12, t = 18 and t = 36 h, the second batch consisted of the time-points t = 6, t = 24 and T = 30 h. Mice were euthanized at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 h post-inoculation as described [26, 29], and the control group simultaneously with the last time-point. Euthanasia was performed using an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and dexmedetomidine (a combination was made with 12.5 mg/ml ketamine, 30 µg/ml dexmedetomidine of which the mice were given 0.1 ml/10 g mice) followed by cardiac puncture. During the experiments no mice reached the predetermined humane endpoint (based on ARIA’s general scoring system including breathing, activity and posture), and no mice died during infection. The experiments were designed following the suggested guidelines of Osuchowski et al. [32].

Sample collection, processing and assays

Of all mice, fresh feces were collected just before inoculation, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Blood from the cardiac puncture was collected in heparin and immediately cooled. A lung and tongue were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Furthermore, the other lung was homogenized in isotonic saline (4 ml per gram of tissue). Bacterial loads of the lung and blood were determined by serial dilution plated onto sheep-blood agar plates and incubated for 16 h at 37 °C, after which the CFU were counted. Following the plating, the blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, in order to obtain the blood plasma. The lung homogenates were diluted 1:1 with a lysis buffer (1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM Tris, 1 mM MgCl(H2O)6, 1 mM CaCl2(H2O)2, pH 7.4) including a protease inhibitor (complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm, for 10 min at 4 °C, after which the supernatant was stored. In blood plasma and lung homogenate supernatant, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and interferon (IFN)-γ levels were determined by a cytometric bead array multiplex (the Mouse Inflammation Kit, BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA).

Microbiota profiling

Repeated bead-beating of the lung, tongue and fecal pellets was performed as described elsewhere (protocol 5 of Costea et al. [33], with STAR (Stool transport and recovery) buffer (Roche, Basel Switzerland)). Following centrifugation, 250 µl supernatant was used with the Maxwell® RSC Blood DNA Kit (Promega, Madison, USA), and the DNA was eluted in 50 µl DNAse free water. Twenty nanograms of DNA was used for the amplification of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene as described [34], with barcoded 341 forward and 805 reverse primers for 25 cycles. For the purification of the amplified product, the AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, USA) were used according to manufacturer’s guidelines on a Beckman Coulter Biomex FX. The purified product was equimolar mixed and loaded for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq with the MiSeq V3 – 600 cycle kit, as instructed by Illumina. The sequence reads were analyzed as follows. Read pairs with perfect matching forward and reverse barcodes were assigned to their corresponding samples. The forwards and reverse reads were length trimmed at 240 and 210, respectively, which were inferred and merged with amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using DADA2 V.1.5.2 [35]. The assignment of taxonomy was done using the DADA2 implementation of the RDP classifier [36] and SILVA 16S reference database [37]. Before the statistical testing (see “Statistical analysis” section below) the data were first screened for an in-house list of common lab-contaminants, if detected these sequences were removed from the dataset.

Statistical analysis

Microbiome statistical tests were performed using the vegan, phyloseq and microbiome package in R. For alpha diversity calculations (Observed species, Chao1 index and Shannon index) the microbiota was rarefied at 500 sequences for lung samples and at 30,000 sequences for tongue and fecal samples. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities was used to calculate beta diversity using non-rarefied data. The composition plots, principal response curve (PRC), Permanova and Spearman correlations were done on genus-level relative abundance data. The PRC places time on the x-axis and takes time along as a co-variate in the analysis and takes another variable, here the infection, to create a new variable which is the interaction of infection and time (creating infection × time). The average genera abundances were calculated between the mice from different time-points during the infection and compared per time-point to t = 0, where the average of t = 0 was copied at each time-point to create an arbitrary group which could be placed on zero on the x-axis. To assess the significance of each of the PRC axes hierarchical permutation tests were performed and p-values calculated. To determine the origin/source (where the bacteria come from) of the lung microbiota, we used FEAST (fast expectation–maximization microbial source tracking). This uses ASV count data of the fecal, tongue and lung microbiome. The individual sample source percentages were calculated using the FEAST probabilistic model and an expectation–maximization approach as described by Shenhav et al. [38]. Statistical analysis on the bacterial counts, inflammatory markers and FEAST generated data was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Significance was calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA with an uncorrected Dunn’s test and verified by a false discovery rate analysis of Benjamini and Hochberg. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Dynamics of local and systemic bacterial loads and inflammation during K. pneumoniae pneumonia

To investigate the changes of the lung microbiota during infection, we used our well-established mouse model of Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonia [26, 29]. The lung, tongue and gut were sampled at multiple time-points during infection to determine both local and systemic bacterial counts and inflammation in addition to the long, tongue and gut microbiome dynamics over time (Fig. 1a).

A rapid logarithmic increase in lung bacterial counts of K. pneumoniae was seen from 6 h post-inoculation (PI) onwards, plateauing after approximately 18 h (Fig. 1b). The first blood cultures became positive 12 h PI, reaching significant differences from t = 0 at 18 h PI (Fig. 1c). This was also reflected in pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles with a strong increase of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6 and MCP-1 levels appearing first locally in the lung after which all mice demonstrated elevated levels of these cytokines in blood already 18 h PI, which emphasizes the systemic inflammatory response syndrome seen in this model (Fig. 1d, e, Additional file 1: Fig. 1).

Impact of the K. pneumoniae infection on the lung microbiota

In order to evaluate the impact of K. pneumoniae infection on the lung microbiome, we first sequenced the lung at all time-points. Alpha diversity of the lung microbiota was not affected by the infection compared to baseline microbiota diversity at t = 0 as measured by Chao1, observed species and Shannon's index (Fig. 2a, Additional file 2: Fig. 2A). However, beta diversity showed that the microbial composition of the lung shifted away from healthy control mice during infection (Fig. 2b). In the healthy lung microbiota (t = 0 h PI) Streptococcus was the most abundant genus present at 65.6% relative abundance, and Lactobacillus was present at 11.6% relative abundance. The change in the lung microbiota over time was largely driven by increased K. pneumoniae bacterial counts in almost all the mice from 18 h PI onwards (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Fig. 2B). At 12 h PI other genera also appeared in larger numbers, such as taxa from the Lachnospiraceae and Staphylococcus. To confirm our observation in microbial shift both in the composition plot and the overall shift observed in the beta diversity, we performed a principal response curve (PRC). The PRC focusses on the effect the infection has on the microbiota composition over time, and it calculates which bacterial genera are important in explaining the differences, where the microbiota composition of the baseline (t = 0) mice were used as the non-infected group (Additional file 2: Fig. 2C). This clearly showed that the genus Streptococcus and Klebsiella were the most prominent members over time, also illustrated in Fig. 2d where we plotted the average relative abundances of these species over time.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lung microbiota dynamics after inoculation with 1 × 104 CFU of K. pneumoniae. Samples were analyzed at time is 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 h, with n = 12 mice. a Shannon index for alpha diversity. b Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of the lung microbiota. c Relative abundances of top 10 most abundant genera. d The most prevalent genera Streptococcus and Klebsiella have been plotted with their relative abundances and standard deviations over time

Full size image

Correlation of pulmonary microbiota to lung bacterial counts and cytokine levels during infection

Furthermore, to investigate whether the composition of the lung microbiota was correlated to time post-inoculation, bacterial counts (as measured in CFUs) and pulmonary cytokine levels, we performed a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (Permanova). Using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of the microbiota between samples, the Permanova fits linear models to the variables and calculates with permutation testing weather the variable is significantly correlated to the microbiota (Table 1). The significant variables were time-points, CFUs of the lung and TNF-α levels of lung homogenates, of which we calculated the top taxa involved in the correlation (Table 1 and Additional file 3: Fig. 3A–C). These analyses confirmed Klebsiella and Streptococcus as major players. Moreover, to investigate if single members of the microbiota were correlated to these same variables, Spearman correlations were performed (Additional file 3: Fig. 3D). Among the significantly correlating genera were Klebsiella and Streptococcus, but also Pseudomonas. However, as also shown in Fig. 2c Pseudomonas was a minor species in the lung microbiota, not represented in the top 10 most abundant genera in the lung.

Table 1 Time post-inoculation, pulmonary bacterial counts and TNF-α correlate to the lung microbiota over time
Full size table

Dynamics of the tongue and gut microbiome during K. pneumoniae-induced pneumosepsis

To investigate the tongue and fecal microbiota during K. pneumoniae pneumonia, we sampled the tongue (as an indicator of oral microbiota) and feces of the mice at 0, 12 and 30 h after intranasal inoculation. In contrast to the lung microbiome, on which the K. pneumoniae infection had a profound impact, we did not observe major changes in the alpha and beta diversity and the relative abundances of phylum and genus over time in the tongue and fecal microbiota (Fig. 3a–c, Additional file 4: Fig. 4A–C). However, Permanova analysis on the relative abundances at the genus and ASV level showed a significant difference between the time-points (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively) for the fecal samples. The tongue samples were not significantly different between the time-points (p = 0.53, p = 0.55 at genus and ASV level, respectively).

Fig. 3
figure 3

source tracking (FEAST) analysis on the lung microbiota showing which percentage of the lung microbiota can be traced back to the tongue, feces and unknown source at 0, 12 and 30 h post-inoculation, in a dataset without K. pneumoniae

Alpha and beta diversity of the lung, tongue and fecal microbiotas. Mice received an intranasal inoculation with 104 colony forming units (CFU) of K. pneumoniae. Mice were killed at 0, 12, and 30 h post-inoculation (n = 12), lung tongue and feces were extracted for microbiota analysis. a Alpha diversity; Shannon of lung tongue and fecal samples at 0, 12 and 30 h post-inoculation. b Beta diversity; PCoA Bray analysis of lung tongue and feces over time. c Genus distribution for lung tongue and fecal microbiota at 0, 12, 30 h post-inoculation, where the top 10 genera in the lung are colored, other genera are grey. d Fast expectation–maximization for microbial

Full size image

To investigate the origin of the lung microbiota, we used the fast expectation–maximization for microbial source tracking (FEAST) analysis. This analysis was performed without K. pneumoniae present in the dataset, as the source of that is external, since it was administrated by us. Moreover, K. pneumoniae was hardly present in the tongue and gut (Fig. 2c) at 12 or 30 h PI. This analysis showed that the healthy lung microbiota largely resembles that of the tongue, but not fecal microbiota. Minimal changes were seen in the contribution of the tongue microbiota to the lung, whereas the fecal microbiota showed a higher contribution to the lung microbiota at 12 h PI, in comparison to 30 h PI (p < 0.001, Fig. 3d, Additional file 4: Fig. 4D and E).

Discussion

We aimed to demonstrate the dynamics in microbiotas during murine K. pneumoniae pneumonia. Profound changes in the lung microbiota were seen already 6 h post-inoculation. Alpha diversity of the lung microbiota was not affected by the infection, whereas the beta diversity was. During infection we saw a constant multiplication of Klebsiella, whereas the amount of Streptococcus present in the lung decreased. Furthermore, in order to investigate the source of the lung microbiota during infection, we also sequenced tongue and fecal samples. Unlike the tongue microbiota, we did see a contribution of the fecal microbiota to the lung microbiota early on in the infection, but this decreased at a later stage in the infection (30 h post-intranasal inoculation).

The lung microbiome has previously been described to closely resemble that of the oropharynx, and contains species such as Streptococcus, Veillonella and Prevotella, which take up 20–30% of the microbiota composition [17, 22]. In our study, we observed that in the healthy murine lung Streptococcus was the most abundant genus present (65.6% relative abundance), while Lactobacillus was also present in all mice (11.6% relative abundance). This is in contrast to Krone and colleagues [25] who analyzed murine lungs during a Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. They found a large contribution of several Bacteroidetes genera in the healthy murine lungs, but also during and after clearance of a Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. They did not observe large contributions of Streptococcus or Lactobacillus in the healthy murine lung. These differences in the baseline composition of the microbiome could be explained by vendor differences by breeders, or possible differences between batches of mice [29, 32, 39]. However, these differences at baseline do need to be addressed when translated to human diseases, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in humans.

In a healthy lung the microbiota is delicately balanced by the reproduction rate of present bacteria, and the immigration and elimination of bacteria. Under normal circumstances, the reproduction rate of bacteria remains low and the immigration and elimination high. However, in (chronic) airway diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and cystic fibrosis, a shift occurs in this balance leading to changes in the microbiota [40, 41]. This can decrease microbial elimination and provide a nutrient-rich environment and areas of lower oxygen levels, allowing bacteria to thrive in the lung. Furthermore, many of the therapies that are often administered during hospitalization for pneumonia can affect the composition of the microbiome, including the use of antibiotics and corticosteroids [17, 18, 41,42,43]. In critical illness the composition of the lung microbiota shifts from closely resembling the oropharynx microbiota towards resembling that of stomach and small intestines, therefore changing the main source of microbes for the lung microbiota [18, 21, 42]. It is important to know the source of bacteria for the lung microbiota as there is a growing body of evidence that the lung microbiota changes during disease and can even predict the outcomes of some diseases [19,20,21, 40]. Therefore, knowing where the unwanted microbes come from can potentially lead to a different view of current treatments.

Fast expectation–maximization for microbial source tracking (FEAST) analysis was used to investigate whether there was a shift in origin of the microbiota of the lung towards that of the tongue or feces overtime. The tongue microbiota showed large similarities with the lung microbiota in a healthy state. However, we were surprised by how little the tongue microbiota changed over the course of the infection and remained the main source for the lung microbiota. Whereas, the gut microbiota started to contribute to the lung microbiota at 12 h post-inoculation, however, this decreased at 30 h post-inoculation when the infection was severe. This murine model of pneumonia and severe sepsis did not show that the main source of the lung microbiota changed towards that of the fecal microbiota during critical illness. Future experiment of the small intestine and stomach during a murine K. pneumoniae infection could be interesting to see whether that would replicate the earlier described transition of source for the lung microbiota in the critically ill [18, 21, 42]. It is also important to note that this study was performed using a murine model in which we did not replicate treatments that human patients would get in hospital, such as sedatives and opiates which potentially affects physical activity and gastrointestinal motility [42].

This study has a number of limitations. First of all, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to analyze the microbiotas, which gives an idea of which bacteria were present in these tissues, but does not give us any functional information. Other methods such as metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, would have also given us additional functional information. Using 16S rRNA sequence analysis only provides data on the bacterial composition, but we did not analyze the composition of fungi and viruses and whether they change in the lung during K. pneumoniae pneumonia. Furthermore, this study investigated the fecal microbiota using fresh stool, whereas it would be interesting to study the upper intestinal tract to gain a better insight into its role as a source for the lung microbiome during critical illness. Moreover, in murine studies, as mentioned above, vendor, diet and batch effect can give rise to differences in these microbiotas [29, 32, 39]. The results are based on a Gram-negative pneumonia that was induced by one strain of K. pneumoniae, whereas different clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae can lead to variations in innate immune response [44], potentially affecting the microbiotas. These experiments were set up using mice, which has as a benefit that it allows us to examine whole organs at many specific time-points post-inoculation which would not be possible in humans. Nonetheless, it is limited in translational capabilities to humans as the composition of the microbiota can see similar trends, but remains different [39].

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study served to gain greater insight into the murine lung microbiota during Gram-negative K. pneumoniae infection, showing the take-over of the infectious pathogen and the lowering abundance of Streptococcus. Furthermore, unlike in humans, this study did not see that the oral microbiota is a good proxy for the lung microbiota. We did demonstrate changes of the gut microbiota during pneumonia, which might be a good predictor for the severity of pneumonia in less lethal pneumonia models. This paper is of significance for future studies investigating the role of the lung microbiome during pneumonia and sepsis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ASV:

Amplicon sequence variant

CFU:

Colony forming units

FEAST:

Fast expectation–maximization microbial source tracking

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

IFN-γ:

Interferon γ

IL-6:

Interleukin 6

K. pneumoniae :

Klebsiella pneumoniae

MCP-1:

Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1

PCoA:

Principal coordinates analysis

PRC:

Principal response curve

Permanova:

Permutational multivariate analysis of variance

PI:

Post-inoculation

STAR:

Stool transport and recovery

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. Wunderink RG, Waterer GW (2014) Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 370(19):1863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fauci AS (2014) Marston l D: The perpetual challenge of antimicrobial resistance. JAMA 311(18):1853–1854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tzouvelekis L, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M et al (2012) Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin Microbiol Rev 25(4):682–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Podschun R, Ullmann U (1998) Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev 11(4):589–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yinnon A, Butnaru A, Raveh D et al (1996) Klebsiella bacteraemia: community versus nosocomial infection. QJM 89(12):933–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko W-C, Paterson DL, Sagnimeni AJ et al (2002) Community-acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: global differences in clinical patterns. Emerg Infect Dis 8(2):160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuijt TJ, van der Poll T, de Vos WM et al (2013) The intestinal microbiota and host immune interactions in the critically ill. Trends Microbiol 21(5):221–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke TB (2014) Early innate immunity to bacterial infection in the lung is regulated systemically by the commensal microbiota via nod-like receptor ligands. Infect Immun 82(11):4596–4606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lankelma JM, Birnie E, Weehuizen TAF et al (2017) The gut microbiota as a modulator of innate immunity during melioidosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(4):e0005548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumas A, Corral D, Colom A et al (2018) The host microbiota contributes to early protection against lung colonization by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front Immunol 9:2656

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gauguet S, D’Ortona S, Ahnger-Pier K et al (2015) Intestinal microbiota of mice influences resistance to Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect Immun 83(10):4003–4014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sencio V, Barthelemy A, Tavares LP et al (2020) Gut dysbiosis during influenza contributes to pulmonary pneumococcal superinfection through altered short-chain fatty acid production. Cell Rep 30(9):2934–2947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulthess J, Pandey S, Capitani M et al (2019) The short chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity 50(2):432–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Haak BW, Westendorp WF, van Engelen TSR et al (2020) Disruptions of anaerobic gut bacteria are associated with stroke and post-stroke infection: a prospective case–control study. Transl Stroke Res 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K et al (2014) Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med 20(2):159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu BG, Segal LN (2018) The lung microbiome and its role in pneumonia. Clin Chest Med 39(4):677–689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dickson RP, Huffnagle GB (2015) The lung microbiome: new principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathog 11(7):e1004923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huffnagle GB, Dickson RP, Lukacs NW (2017) The respiratory tract microbiome and lung inflammation: a two-way street. Mucosal Immunol 10(2):299–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson RP, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T et al (2020) Lung microbiota predict clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 201(5):555–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bos LDJ, Weda H, Wang YY et al (2014) Exhaled breath metabolomics as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J 44(1):188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickson RP, Singer BH, Newstead MW et al (2016) Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Microbiol 1(10):16113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bassis CM, Erb-Downward JR, Dickson RP et al (2015) Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. MBio 6(2):e00037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Martinez FJ et al (2016) The microbiome and the respiratory tract. Annu Rev Physiol 78:481–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lankelma JM, van Vught LA, Belzer C et al (2017) Critically ill patients demonstrate large interpersonal variation in intestinal microbiota dysregulation: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med 43(1):59–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krone CL, Biesbroek G, Trzcinski K et al (2014) Respiratory microbiota dynamics following Streptococcus pneumoniae acquisition in young and elderly mice. Infect Immun 82(4):1725–1731

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Claushuis TAM, de Vos AF, Nieswandt B et al (2018) Platelet glycoprotein VI aids in local immunity during pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Blood 131(8):864–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anas AA, Hovius JW, van’t Veer C et al (2010) Role of CD14 in a mouse model of acute lung inflammation induced by different lipopolysaccharide chemotypes. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Achouiti A, Vogl T, Urban CF et al (2012) Myeloid-related protein-14 contributes to protective immunity in Gram-negative pneumonia derived sepsis. PLoS Pathog 8(10):e1002987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolff NS, Jacobs MC, Haak BW et al (2020) Vendor effects on murine gut microbiota and its influence on lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inflammation and Gram-negative pneumonia. Intensive Care Med Exp 8(1):47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. van der Windt GJW, Florquin S, de Vos AF et al (2010) CD44 deficiency is associated with increased bacterial clearance but enhanced lung inflammation during Gram-negative pneumonia. Am J Pathol 177(5):2483–2494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Windt GJW, Hoogerwerf JJ, de Vos AF et al (2010) Osteopontin promotes host defense during Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonia. Eur Respir J 36(6):1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Osuchowski MF, Ayala A, Bahrami S et al (2018) Minimum quality threshold in pre-clinical sepsis studies (MQTiPSS): an international expert consensus initiative for improvement of animal modeling in sepsis. Intensive Care Med Exp 6:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Costea PI, Zeller G, Sunagawa S et al (2017) Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies. Nat Biotechnol 35(11):1069–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT et al (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(17):5112–5120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ et al (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13(7):581–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM et al (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shenhav L, Thompson M, Joseph TA et al (2019) FEAST: fast expectation-maximization for microbial source tracking. Nat Methods 16(7):627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hugenholtz F, de Vos WM (2018) Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: a critical evaluation. Cell Mol Life Sci 75(1):149–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Dwyer DN, Dickson RP, Moore BB (2016) The lung microbiome, immunity, and the pathogenesis of chronic lung disease. J Immunol 196(12):4839–4847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wolff NS, Hugenholtz F, Wiersinga WJ (2018) The emerging role of the microbiota in the ICU. Crit Care 22(1):78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Dickson RP (2016) The microbiome and critical illness. Lancet Respir Med 4(1):59–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dickson RP, Martinez FJ, Huffnagle GB (2014) The role of the microbiome in exacerbations of chronic lung diseases. Lancet 384(9944):691–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Xiong HZ, Carter RA, Leiner IM et al (2015) Distinct contributions of neutrophils and CCR2(+) monocytes to pulmonary clearance of different Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Infect Immun 83(9):3418–3427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Jorn Hartman, Xanthe Verdoes and Mark Davids who have helped with processing and analyzing the microbiota data (Microbiota Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands).

Funding

This work was funded by the Horizon2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie International Training Network “the European Sepsis Academy” and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Vidi-grant).

Author information

Author notes

  1. W.Joost Wiersinga and Floor Hugenholtz shared last authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Nora S. Wolff, Max C. Jacobs, W. Joost Wiersinga & Floor Hugenholtz

  2. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    W. Joost Wiersinga

Authors
  1. Nora S. Wolff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Max C. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Joost Wiersinga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Floor Hugenholtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NSW, MCJ, WJW FH designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. NSW and MCJ executed the murine experiments. FH, NSW and MCJ generated the data and NSW and FH performed the analysis of the microbiota data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Joost Wiersinga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam (identification numbers DIX 18-5804-1-01). The animal care and use protocol adhered to European Directive of 22 September 2010 (Directive 2010/63/EU) in addition to the Directive of 6 May 2009 (Directive 2009/41/EC).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. 1.

Cytokine values of lung and blood during K. pneumoniae infection. Mice received an intranasal inoculation with 104colony forming units (CFU) of K.pneumoniae. A group was sacrificed every 6 hours, until 36 hours (n=10-12).Interferon (IFN)-γ (A, B), interleukin (IL)-6 (C, D),and monocyte chemoattractant protein -1 (MCP-1) (E, F) were measuredin lung homogenate (A, C and D) and blood plasma (B, Dand F). Data is shown as median, thetop bar denotes at which timepoints the data is significantly different fromthe 0 hour group, the stars show the range of significance, P<0.05 (*),p<0.01 (**), p<0.001 (***), p<0.0001 (****).

Additional file 2: Fig. 2.

Lung microbiota dynamics after inoculation with 1x104 CFU of K. pneumoniae. Samples were analyzed at time is 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours, with n=12 mice. (A) Observed species, Chao1 index and Shannon index for alpha diversity. (B) Relative abundances of the phyla in the lung microbiota. (C) PRC places time on the x-axis and takes time along as a co-variate in the genera of the lung microbiota composition on T=0 was copied at each time point to create an arbitrary group which could be placed on zero on the x-axis. The lung microbiome was significantly different (p=0.01) in time than our arbitrary T=0 group om the x axis.

Additional file 3: Fig. 3.

Top correlations to the lung microbiota overtime found by Permanova. The timespan of the experiment, the measured CFU’s, cytokines in the lung homogenate were tested for correlation with the lung microbiota by Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (Permanova). Using bray-curtis dissimilarities of the microbiota between samples, the Permanova fits linear models to the variables and calculates with permutation testing weather the variable is significantly correlated to the microbiota (Table 1). The top taxa involved in the correlation with the significant variables are shown in the this figure for (A) time-points, (B) CFUs of the lung and (C) TNF-alpha levels. (D) Correlation to single members of the microbiota was tested via Spearman correlation to these same variables, + sign in the boxes indicate adjusted p-value > .1, increased intensity of red is a greater positive correlation and blue indicated a negative correlation. 

Additional file 4: Fig. 4.

Relative abundance and beta diversity of lung tongue and fecal microbiota. Mice received an intranasal inoculation with 104 colony forming units (CFU) of K. pneumoniae. Mice were sacrificed at 0, 12, and 30 hours post inoculation (n=12), lung, tongue and feces were extracted for microbiota analysis. (A) Phylum distribution for lung tongue and fecal microbiota. PCoA of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of tongue (B) and lung (C) microbiota over time. Fast expectation-maximization for microbial source tracking (FEAST) analysis on the lung microbiota showing which percentage of the lung microbiota can be traced back to the tongue (D) and feces (E) source in a data set without K. pneumoniae. Data is shown as median, p< 0.001 (***), n.s. denotes not significant.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolff, N.S., Jacobs, M.C., Wiersinga, W.J. et al. Pulmonary and intestinal microbiota dynamics during Gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis. ICMx 9, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-021-00398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-021-00398-4

Keywords