Skip to main content

Electroencephalographic monitoring of brain activity during cardiac arrest: a narrative review



To date cardiac arrest (CA) remains a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality: despite advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival is still burdened by hypoxic–ischemic brain injury (HIBI), and poor neurological outcome, eventually leading to withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WLST). The aim of CPR is cardiac pump support to preserve organ perfusion, until normal cardiac function is restored. However, clinical parameters of target organ end-perfusion during CPR, particularly brain perfusion, are still to be identified. In this context, electroencephalography (EEG) and its derivatives, such as processed EEG, could be used to assess brain function during CA.


We aimed to review literature regarding the feasibility of EEG and processed or raw EEG monitoring during CPR.


A review of the available literature was performed and consisted of mostly case reports and observational studies in both humans and animals, for a total number of 22 relevant studies.


The research strategy identified 22 unique articles. 4 observational studies were included and 6 animal testing studies in swine models. The remaining studies were case reports. Literature regarding this topic consists of conflicting results, containing studies where the feasibility of EEG during CPR was positive, and others where the authors reached opposite conclusions. Furthermore, the level of evidence, in general, remains low.


EEG may represent a useful tool to assess CPR effectiveness. A multimodal approach including other non-invasive tools such as, quantitative infrared pupillometry and transcranial Doppler, could help to optimize the quality of resuscitation maneuvers.

Take home message

Future randomized trials are required to adopt EEG monitoring during CPR, also considering its possible role in a multiparametric assessment of cerebral function and perfusion.



CA represents nowadays the third leading cause of death in Europe [1]. A distinction is usually made between in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), with a European annual incidence of 1.5/2.8 per 1000 hospital admissions, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), where the true incidence is not known due to substantial underreporting and excessive variability between countries: it is estimated to be between 67 and 170 per 100,000 inhabitants [1].

According to the EuReCa TWO study, the mean age of patients who undergo resuscitation is 67.6 years, 65% are male, while in those for whom CPR is not started the mean age is 71.5 years [2]. Only approximately 20% of the patients have an initial shockable rhythm [2].

Early initiation of CPR, and increased use of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) have improved the chance of CA survival. The EuReCa TWO study reported an overall survival rate of 8% after OHCA in Europe [2], while for IHCA the chance of survival to discharge/30 days varies from 15 to 34% [1].

The main cause of death is active WLST after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) whenever the severity of HIBI indicates a poor neurological outcome [3]. HIBI is frequent in CA patients and its pathophysiology follows a two-hit model [4]: first, the reduction of cerebral blood flow, followed after ROSC by ischemia–reperfusion injury [4].

Accurate prognostication is essential to prevent inappropriate WLST, and to avoid futile treatment in patients with irreversible neurological injury [5]: besides overall survival, post-CA neurological status and subsequent patient’s quality of life should be considered as measures of CPR outcome. In order to prevent HIBI, CPR should maintain adequate cerebral function until cardiac pump recovers.

In this context, early neurological monitoring during and after CPR can provide prognostic clinical features of pivotal significance in post-resuscitation care.

The 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guidelines suggest that the prognostication strategy algorithm should be applied to all patients with an absent, extensor or abnormal flexion motor response to pain after ≥ 72 h [3]. In such cases, a poor outcome is likely if two or more of the following conditions occur: (a) no pupillary and corneal reflexes at ≥ 72 h; (b) bilaterally absent N20 somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) wave at ≥ 24 h; (c) highly malignant EEG at > 24 h; (d) neuron specific enolase (NSE) > 60 µg/L at 48 h and/or 72 h; (e) status myoclonus 72 h; (f) or a diffuse and extensive anoxic injury on brain CT/MRI [3]. However, these different conditions only account for prognosis following CPR.

Factors that could affect neurological outcome during CPR are yet to be clearly identified. To date, the best predictor of outcome is end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) level after 20 min of resuscitation [6]. However, using EtCO2 thresholds alone for decision-making to stop resuscitation is not recommended, due to the absence of blind studies and the subsequent risk of self-fulfilling prophecy [6]. Furthermore, although EtCO2 might be a surrogate marker for systemic circulation status, it does not account for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [7].

CPP is derived from mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP), which is invasively measured using a catheter inserted through the skull and the dura mater. This hinders the possibility of acquiring ICP measurements while performing CPR.

Conversely, EEG offers a continuous real-time non-invasive monitoring of brain function, and is sensitive to cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes [8]. Traditionally, EEG has been used to assess the neurological function after CA since the 1960s, when Hockaday et al. proposed a grading system to categorize EEG patterns and the related prognosis [9]. In most cases suppressed patterns are found immediately after CA occurs, progressively increasing in amplitude and continuity during the recovery phase [10]. Therefore, EEG gains reliability in determining prognosis only after 24 h.

However, EEG sensitivity to CBF variations might be useful to predict the adequacy of cerebral oxygenation during chest compressions: few seconds after cardiac arrest, the EEG becomes isoelectric [9]; while after CPR initiation, a return of signal activity might represent a sign of cerebral perfusion [11].

Furthermore, it might be possible to use raw EEG, such as Bispectral Index™ (BIS™) or SedLine® PSi, initially developed to monitor the depth of anesthesia. These methods are based on the signal registered by frontal electrodes, in a more rapid and easier way than positioning EEG electrodes [12]. This characteristic may be convenient, considering that the rare adoption of neurophysiologic monitoring during resuscitation is partly related to the fear of delays in starting CPR or increasing interruptions in chest compressions.

Other possibilities to assess cerebral perfusion and function are transcranial Doppler, optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation, and quantitative infrared pupillometry [13]. Among these non-invasive tools, quantitative infrared pupillometry is particularly promising [14], and easy to perform. Neurological Pupil index (NPi) is the one of the most important evaluating parameters since it is independent of pupil size and sedation [15]. Moreover, an NPi ≤ 2 correlates with poor neurologic outcome in OHCA with a predictive value of 100% [13, 17].


The goal of this review is to discuss the feasibility of EEG monitoring during CPR through analysis of the data available in literature.


Given the lack of published literature, we did not perform a systematic review.

Search strategy

A literature search was performed with MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE databases. No restrictions were placed on date, language, or country of study publication.

Study selection

We searched through PubMed using the following medical subjects heading (MeSH) terms: ‘cardiac arrest’ AND ‘cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ AND ‘electroencephalogram’. This yielded 127 publications. Moreover, we used the following Emtree terms for EMBASE: ‘heart arrest’ AND ‘resuscitation’ AND ‘electroencephalogram’. This yielded to 573 results.

After duplicates were removed, we identified 22 eligible studies, including only those considering EEG or raw EEG as neuro-prognostication markers during CPR, among which 6 are conducted in animals, particularly in swine models of cardiac arrest. As a matter of fact, pigs represent a valid model of neuro-prognostication during cardiac arrest, as not only cardiovascular physiology is similar in swine and humans, but also the gyrated pig brain shares affinity with the gyrated primate brain [16].

Table 1 lists human studies and respective prognostication markers, while Table 2 lists the studies conducted in animals.

Table 1 EEG, raw EEG, and Bispectral index as CPR effectiveness markers
Table 2 EEG as a neuro-prognostic marker in animal models

Figure 1 illustrates literature search process.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Literature search process


The search strategy identified 22 unique articles (Tables 1, 2). Dates of publication ranged from 1985 to 2022. 3 observational cross-sectional studies and 1 observational prospective study were included (145 patients—Table 1), and 6 (27.3%) animal testing studies in swine models. The remaining were case reports.

16 studies among the total number of 22 regarded human patients and mostly raw EEG was used to predict CPR efficacy, while EEG use was essentially limited to cardiac arrest in the perioperative period.

One study associated EEG monitoring using SedLine® technology with real-time cerebral oxygenation monitoring [18], observing that cortical activity was only present at regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) levels above approximately 20%. At rSO2 levels equal or inferior to 19% and soon after CA occurs, a voltage suppression pattern was consistently detected. Other observed patterns were theta background activity, delta background activity, periodic discharges, burst suppression, spike and wave, and rhythmic delta activity [18]. Delta background activity was detected only at rSO2 levels above 40%, possibly reflecting a better neurological outcome [18].

Ten of the 16 human studies reported that EEG/raw EEG monitoring during CPR, as a marker of cerebral function, is feasible [11, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 28, 29], while 5 expressed a negative opinion [24,25,26, 30, 31], highlighting the risk of mechanical artifacts due to external chest compressions. This concern was specifically analyzed in another case report study [27], which showed CPR artifacts as periodic sharply contoured waveforms. Of interest, as compressor fatigue takes over, CPR artifacts may vary [27]. Moreover, in this case, an isoelectric pattern was noted between CPR attempts, possibly reflecting absence of cortical activity [27].

As for animal models [7, 32,33,34,35,36], ventricular fibrillation was medically induced and treated following a standard protocol. In all these cases, EEG showed a good correlation with cerebral blood flow recovery. In 2 (50%) [7, 34], EEG signal was used to derive a parameter called EEG-based brain resuscitation index (EBRI) that could be used as surrogate of cerebral perfusion pressure [7], and also showed moderate correlation with EtCO2 [34].


Despite recent advances in performing CPR, CA remains a frequent cause of death. Although CPR might be effective in restoring systemic circulation, single organs could suffer persistent damages secondary to hypoxia and ischemia.

Particularly, brain damage has a significant impact in patients. The aim of CPR should be to restore cardiac function, and at the same time preventing brain injuries due to the low/no-flow state (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should aim to make up for the cardiac pump, maintaining blood flow to target organs, such as brain. Thus, CPR performance should be assessed not only through markers of systemic circulation, such as EtCO2

Early recognition of a patient who may neurologically recover after CPR still represents a challenge. The actual prognostication algorithm is applicable only at ≥ 72 h from ROSC [3].

At present there is not a single parameter that can estimate the quality of cerebral perfusion and the possible success of resuscitation maneuvers on brain function [6].

Monitoring cerebral function during CPR could provide information on prognosis and guide decision-making algorithm.

In this context EEG may be a non-invasive and economic method to monitor cerebral function. Changes in the EEG pattern in relation to brain hypoxic/ischemic damage have long been recognized: just after CA occurs EEG becomes isoelectric, after CPR beginning EEG pattern might change, due to cerebral reperfusion. Particularly, a delta background activity, being associated with higher rSO2 values, might forecast better neurological outcome [18].

However, the complexity of electrode placement and interpretation, limited EEG monitoring during CPR to very few case reports or human studies. In this context, the advent of simplified EEG monitoring systems, such as processed EEG, which are gradually increasing in reliability through the years, may allow to analyze cortical brain activity. This information could be added to the automated pupillometry monitoring results derived from brainstem activity, thus potentially providing a global picture of the brain’s status during CPR.

While results in animal models are promising [7, 32,33,34,35,36], literature data in humans are still controversial. Few studies suggested that BIS™ or PSi values, and/or EEG analysis might reflect cerebral oxygenation [11, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23]; nevertheless, others showed that BIS™ values, and EEG monitoring are not reliable indicator of cerebral function due to mechanical artifacts related to external chest compression and involuntary head movements [26]. Thus, after reviewing the literature, we have not found any convincing evidence suggesting standardized use of simplified EEG during CPR. However, use of new and easy-to-use/apply devices, such as Bluetooth headsets and casques, along with the evolution of automated chest compression technique, may help in standardizing the signal.


Our narrative review is limited by the low level of evidence of the available literature. Most of the studies in human patients, in fact, are case reports. As for animal studies, the prediction models should be regarded as preliminary.


Neurological prognosis after CA is still a challenge. The use of EEG, and raw EEG models has evolved: at the moment, its role is limited to post-resuscitation care. Innovative EEG methodologies, including quantitative analysis, and machine learning, seem promising for assisting clinicians during the CPR decision-making process, despite the conflicting literature.

Although further studies in humans are needed to explore the potential usefulness of different EEG tools, neuro-monitoring could optimize resuscitation identifying individuals in whom further resuscitation attempts might reveal futile. Nevertheless, in the absence of evidence-based studies, EEG patterns during CPR are not yet recommended to support withdrawal decisions.

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.


  1. Gräsner JT, Herlitz J, Tjelmeland IBM, Wnent J, Masterson S, Lilja G, Bein B, Böttiger BW, Rosell-Ortiz F, Nolan JP, Bossaert L, Perkins GD (2021) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gräsner JT, Wnent J, Herlitz J, Perkins GD, Lefering R, Tjelmeland I, Koster RW, Masterson S, Rossell-Ortiz F, Maurer H, Böttiger BW, Moertl M, Mols P, Alihodić H, Hadibegović I, Ioannides M, Truhlár A, Wissenberg M, Salo A, Escutnaire J, Nikolaou N, Nagy E, Jonsson B, Wright P, Semeraro F, Clarens C, Beesems S, Cebula G, Correia VH, Cimpoesu D, Raffay V, Trenkler S, Markota A, Strömsö A, Burkart R, Booth S, Bossaert L (2020) Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe—results of the EuReCa TWO study. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Böttiger BW, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Friberg H, Genbrugge C, Haywood K, Lilja G, Moulaert V, Nikolaou N, Olasveengen T, Skrifvars MB, Taccone F, Soar J (2021) European resuscitation council and European society of intensive care medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Griesdale DE (2017) Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest: a ‘two-hit’ model. Crit Care.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandroni C, Cronberg T, Sekhon M (2021) Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. Intensive Care Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djärv T, Lott C, Olasveengen T, Paal P, Pellis T, Perkins GD, Sandroni C, Nolan JP (2021) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim TH, Kim H, Hong KJ, Shin SD, Kim HC, Park YJ, Ro YS, Song KJ, Kim KH, Choi DS, Kang HJ (2021) Prediction of cerebral perfusion pressure during CPR using electroencephalogram in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation. Am J Emerg Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Perera L, Khan S, Singh S, Kromm J, Wang M, Sajobi T, Jetté N, Wiebe S, Josephson CB (2022) EEG patterns and outcomes after hypoxic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bronder J, Cho SM, Geocadin RG, Ritzl EK (2022) Revisiting EEG as part of the multidisciplinary approach to post-cardiac arrest care and prognostication: a review. Resusc Plus.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandroni C, Cronberg T, Hofmeijer J (2022) EEG monitoring after cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Losasso TJ, Muzzi DA, Meyer FB, Sharbrough FW (1992) Electroencephalographic monitoring of cerebral function during asystole and successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesth Analg.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azim N, Wang CY (2004) The use of bispectral index during a cardiopulmonary arrest: a potential predictor of cerebral perfusion. Anaesthesia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinha N, Parnia S (2017) Monitoring the brain after cardiac arrest: a new era. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HJ, Shin J, Hong KJ, Jung JH, Lee SJ, Jung E, You KM, Kim TH (2019) A feasibility study for the continuous measurement of pupillary response using the pupillography during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Riker RR, Sawyer ME, Fischman VG, May T, Lord C, Eldridge A, Seder DB (2020) Neurological pupil index and pupillary light reflex by pupillometry predict outcome early after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vognsen M, Fabian-Jessing NK, Secher N, Løfgren B, Dezfulian C, Andersen LW, Granfeldt A (2017) Contemporary animal models of cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, Miroz JP, Horn J, Rundgren M, Cariou A, Payen JF, Storm C, Stammet P, Taccone FS (2018) Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reagan EM, Nguyen RT, Ravishankar ST, Chabra V, Fuentes B, Spiegel R, Parnia S (2018) Monitoring the relationship between changes in cerebral oxygenation and electroencephalography patterns during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a feasibility study. Crit Care Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Young WL, Ornstein W (1985) Compressed spectral array EEG monitoring during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Anaesthesiology

  20. Chakravarthy M, Patil T, Jayaprakash K, Shivananda N, Jawali V (2003) Bispectral index is an indicator of adequate cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kluger MT (2001) The bispectral index during an anaphylactic circulatory arrest. Anaesth Intensive Care.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Szekely B, Saint-Marc T, Degrémont AC, Castelain MH, Fischler M (2002) Value of bispectral index monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Br J Anaesth.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biesbroek JM, Hopmans EM, Seeber AA, Tromp SC (2018) EEG registration during ventricular tachycardia and resuscitation. Neurol Clin Pract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fatovich DM, Jacobs IG, Celenza A, Paech MJ (2006) An observational study of bispectral index monitoring for out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chollet-Xémard C, Combes X, Soupizet F, Jabre P, Penet C, Bertrand C, Margenet A, Marty J (2009) Bispectral index monitoring is useless during cardiac arrest patients’ resuscitation. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nitzschke R, Schmidt GN (2012) Electroencephalography during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Emerg Med.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sethi NK, Torgovnick J, Sethi PK, Arsura E (2008) Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Artifact during Electroencephalography. Clin EEG Neurosci

  28. Nguyen NK, Lenkovsky F, Joshi GP (2005) Patient state index during a cardiac arrest in the operating room. Anesth Analg.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jung JY, Kim Y, Kim JE (2013) Usefulness of the bispectral index during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Korean J Anesthesiol.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soto MA, Giraldo JM, Carmona FJ, Jimenez FX (2010) Prognostic of survival by bispectral index obtained during CPR. Resuscitation

  31. Dumans-Nizard V, Hamada S, Fischler M (2010) Bispectral index during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a poor indicator of recovery. Two very different cases. Anaesthesia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim H, Kim KH, Hong KJ, Ku Y, Shin SD, Kim HC (2020) Frontal EEG changes with the recovery of carotid blood flow in a cardiac arrest swine model. Sensors.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim H, Kim KH, Hong KJ, Ku Y, Shin SD, Kim HC (2021) EEG-based prediction of the recovery of carotid blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model. Sensors.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi DS, Kim H, Hong KJ, Shin SD, Kim HC, Park YJ, Kim TH, Ro YS, Song KJ, Kim KH (2021) Correlation of EEG-based brain resuscitation index and end-tidal carbon dioxide in porcine cardiac arrest model. Signa Vitae.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Caballero A, Benet P, Bobi J, Fontanals J, Magaldi M, Mérida E (2019) Bispectral index in an experimental model of cardiac arrest: monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rees J, Puertas L, Metzger A, McKnite S, Sloper D, Yannopoulos D, Lurie K (2014) The product of EtCO2 and an EEG measurement correlates with cerebral perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model of cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care

Download references


We thank our colleagues from the Coma PoST-ACC (COAST) group who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research: Buffoli Francesca, Renzi Stefania, Moroni Carlo, Falappi Michele, Alberti Giancarlo, Iob Teresa, Boschetti Chiara, Montini Vittorio.


The authors declare no funding was received in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




RE and CG conceived of the presented idea and equally contributed to the elaboration of the manuscript. FAR and ECA supervised this work. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabetta Roberti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberti, E., Chiarini, G., Latronico, N. et al. Electroencephalographic monitoring of brain activity during cardiac arrest: a narrative review. ICMx 11, 4 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: