Open Access

Whole blood microRNA markers are associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome

  • Zhaozhong Zhu1,
  • Liming Liang2, 3,
  • Ruyang Zhang1, 4,
  • Yongyue Wei1, 4,
  • Li Su1,
  • Paula Tejera1,
  • Yichen Guo1,
  • Zhaoxi Wang1,
  • Quan Lu1,
  • Andrea A. Baccarelli1,
  • Xi Zhu5,
  • Ednan K. Bajwa6,
  • B. Taylor Thompson6,
  • Guo-Ping Shi7 and
  • David C. Christiani1, 6Email author
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20175:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-017-0155-0

Received: 17 February 2017

Accepted: 21 August 2017

Published: 30 August 2017

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) can play important roles in inflammation and infection, which are common manifestations of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We assessed if whole blood miRNAs were potential diagnostic biomarkers for human ARDS.

Methods

This nested case-control study (N = 530) examined a cohort of ARDS patients and critically ill at-risk controls. Whole blood miRNA profiles and logistic regression analyses identified miRNAs correlated with ARDS. Stratification analysis also assessed selected miRNA markers for their role in sepsis and pneumonia associated with ARDS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated miRNA diagnostic performance, along with Lung Injury Prediction Score (LIPS).

Results

Statistical analyses were performed on 294 miRNAs, selected from 754 miRNAs after quality control screening. Logistic regression identified 22 miRNAs from a 156-patient discovery cohort as potential risk or protective markers of ARDS. Three miRNAs—miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424—from the discovery cohort remained significantly associated with ARDS in a 373-patient independent validation cohort (FDR q < 0.05) and meta-analysis (p < 0.001). ROC analyses demonstrated a LIPS baseline area-under-the-curve (AUC) value of ARDS of 0.708 (95% CI 0.651–0.766). Addition of miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 to LIPS increased baseline AUC to 0.723 (95% CI 0.667–0.778), with a relative integrated discrimination improvement of 2.40 (p = 0.005) and a category-free net reclassification index of 27.21% (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

miR-181a and miR-92a are risk biomarkers for ARDS, whereas miR-424 is a protective biomarker. Addition of these miRNAs to LIPS can improve the risk estimate for ARDS.

Keywords

ARDS MicroRNA LIPS Whole blood

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a complex syndrome occurring in critically ill patients and is characterized as acute inflammation and infection caused by direct and indirect injury to the lung. ARDS affects approximately 200,000 people annually in the USA, carries a mortality rate of 40%, and is a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. ARDS is mainly initiated by neutrophils accumulation and activation in the lungs, such cells can release inflammatory mediators and cytokines to damage pulmonary tissues [2, 3].

Importantly, the complex etiology and lack of reliable biomarkers have complicated ARDS diagnosis and treatment. Many protein-based biomarkers have been identified from plasma [4], but none have been translated to clinical diagnostic routines. More comprehensive study designs are needed to identify new mediators for ARDS pathogenic mechanisms [5]. Further, no previous studies have evaluated the potential or performance of whole blood microRNAs (miRNAs) to diagnose ARDS.

miRNAs, a group of small non-coding RNAs, regulate gene expression by binding to specific target sites on messenger RNA to either repress or degrade targets. Previous studies have discovered important roles for miRNAs in many disorders, including inflammation and infection [6, 7]. Thus, miRNA expression patterns may be able to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for better disease detection [8, 9]. Studies have suggested miRNAs are involved in ARDS development. In a rat model of ARDS, miRNA profiling of lung tissue demonstrated altered expression of multiple miRNAs compared to control tissues [10]. We recently demonstrated that whole blood miRNAs can be potentially valuable for predicting ARDS 28-day mortality due to their related function in multiple organ failure (MOF), which is a primary risk factor of ARDS patient mortality. Indeed, a miRNA panel is comparable to APACHE III in mortality prediction ability [11].

Yet, to date, no study has tested whether whole blood miRNAs may serve as biomarkers for ARDS risk. Whole blood offers advantages for miRNA profiling compared to other tissue types because it contains rich immune cell- and tissue-specific miRNAs with low risk of noise from additional serum or plasma isolation steps or sample contamination [12]. Therefore, we compared miRNA expression in whole blood preparations from two large populations of ARDS patients and critically ill at-risk controls.

Methods

Study population and design

This nested case-control study was part of an ongoing Molecular Epidemiology Study of ARDS (MEARDS) at Harvard Medical School that was initiated in 2000. MEARDS has more than 4000 patients and includes both ARDS patients and at-risk controls who were critically ill patients admitted to the ICU of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH; Boston, MA) or Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC; Boston, MA) [13, 14]. Commonly known ARDS risk factors and their definitions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Detailed inclusion criteria are described in the “Supplemental Methods and Results” section in Additional file 1 and illustrated in Additional file 1: Figure S1. All ARDS subjects met the Berlin diagnostic definition [15]: timing of ARDS was within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms; chest imaging showed bilateral opacities (not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules); respiratory failure was not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload; and ARDS severity was based on PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Exclusion criteria included ages younger than 18 years old, diffused alveolar hemorrhage or chronic lung disease, which may mimic ARDS, and directive to withhold intubation. Patients with neutropenia not secondary to sepsis and immunosuppression secondary to medication or diseases such as HIV infection were excluded. Treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor was also excluded [13]. Patients were enrolled in the study immediately after meeting all inclusion criteria [15]. Institutional review boards of MGH, BIDMC, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health approved this study.

We used a two-phase study with a total of 530 participants (recruited during 2003–2012), including 199 ARDS and 330 at-risk controls. One patient without information was excluded (Fig. 1). The discovery population (n = 156) included 78 ARDS patients (cases) and 78 at-risk patients (controls), matched by age (± 5 years) and sex. Twenty-two miRNAs were used to build an ARDS risk factor panel that included one independent validation cohort (n = 373) containing 121 ARDS cases and 252 controls.
Fig. 1

Study design of discovery cohort, validation cohort, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). *One control sample was excluded due to few detectable miRNAs. **Discovery cohort ARDS and at-risk controls were matched by age (± 5 years) and gender

RNA isolation

Peripheral whole blood from 530 participants was collected in Tri Reagent solution (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) within 24 h of participant enrollment and stored at − 80 °C. Tri Reagent is a robust miRNA stabilization method for long-term storage and can generate reproducible results without degradation [16]. Total RNA containing small RNA was extracted from whole blood. RNA quality was assessed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA), and RNA integrity numbers (RIN) were reported. Total RNA with RIN of 6.5–10 was processed for complementary DNA synthesis using TaqMan Megaplex RT primer pools A or B and then amplified with Megaplex PreAmp primers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). One control sample in the validation cohort was excluded due to few detectable miRNAs.

miRNA profiling

In the discovery phase, we used the TaqMan OpenArray Human MicroRNA Panel (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and detected expression of 754 human miRNA transcripts. After quality control screening, we selected 294 miRNAs for discovery cohort analysis. Twenty-two miRNAs were selected from the discovery cohort for further validation in an independent validation cohort. In the validation cohort, we used OpenArray QuantStudio system to customize miRNA expression arrays (Applied Biosystems). Technical consistency of assays within and across cohorts was also tested using three random samples.

Statistical analysis

We applied stringent quality control (QC) criteria for miRNA analysis in order to maintain the confidence of statistical results: good amplification score > 1.1, Cq confidence > 0.8, high expression (Ct < 30), and detectable expression in more than half of the samples. We performed both univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify miRNA candidates that were associated with ARDS status. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Discovery miRNA candidate selection was based on the following criterion: fold change > 1.5 or < 0.67 from the logistic regression model in at least one of four normalization methods [9]. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to investigate if candidate miRNAs were significantly enriched in the whole miRNA gene set [17].

To build the miRNA risk factor model, we used miRNAs that were validated in all cohorts with the same effect directions, and we computed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic-curve (AUC) to assess performance of risk factors. To compare miRNA risk factors, we considered the base model for ARDS risk factor assessment to include only Lung Injury Prediction Score (LIPS) [18]. Based on our miRNA results, we included miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424, in combination with the LIPS model, in a miRNA classifier for ARDS risk factor evaluation. To further assess the incremental diagnostic power of those three miRNAs when added to the baseline LIPS risk model, we computed integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI) (“Supplemental Methods and Results” section in Additional file 1), which offer an intuitive way of quantifying improvement offered by new biomarkers [19].

Values of p < 0.05 or false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed with R software (v.3.3.0) and Statistical Analysis System software (v.9.3, SAS Institute).

Results

Demographic features and clinical variables of the discovery and validation cohorts are presented in Additional file 1: Table S2. In all experiments, we distributed samples such that age, sex, case-control status, and RNA quality were balanced with respect to the day of purification and the day of analysis or plate number and were randomized within each day and plate. This aspect is important to reduce confounding effects from technical variation, such as plate-to-plate variation and purification differences [20].

miRNA screening and validation

In total, 754 miRNA transcripts were identified from the discovery cohort. We only included 294 miRNAs that met our QC inclusion criteria to maintain robust statistical results. Ultimately, 22 miRNAs were selected based on fold change as candidate risk factors for ARDS from the logistic regression model (Table 1). Of the 22 miRNAs, 3 miRNAs—miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424—remained significant risk factors (OR > 1.0) or protective factors (OR < 1.0) for ARDS in the validation cohort after multiple testing adjustment by FDR (Benjamini–Hochberg) (Table 1). From fixed effect meta-analysis, 14 miRNAs appeared to be significant risk/protective factors for ARDS. Of those 14 miRNAs, miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 demonstrated the strongest associations with ARDS risk (p < 0.001) (Table 1).
Table 1

miRNA associations with ARDS in discovery cohort, validation cohorts, combined cohorts, and meta-analysis

 

Discovery cohort (n = 156)

Validation cohort (n = 373)

Meta-analysis (n = 529)

MicroRNA

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

FDR q

OR (95% CI)

p

miR-424

0.52 (0.29–0.93)

0.78 (0.66–0.94)

0.022

0.77 (0.67–0.9)

< 0.001

miR-92a

1.60 (1.11–2.31)

1.75 (1.26–2.43)

0.022

1.69 (1.32–2.17)

< 0.001

miR-181a

1.75 (1.03–2.97)

1.76 (1.21–2.56)

0.037

1.68 (1.26–2.23)

< 0.001

miR-331

1.67 (1.11–2.52)

1.69 (1.12–2.56)

0.097

1.74 (1.29–2.36)

< 0.001

miR-29b

0.66 (0.44–0.99)

0.82 (0.68–0.99)

0.132

0.79 (0.67–0.93)

0.004

miR-1290

0.66 (0.41–1.08)

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

0.097

0.83 (0.73–0.95)

0.006

miR-155

1.57 (1.03–2.38)

1.40 (0.95–2.08)

0.195

1.32 (1.07–1.64)

0.009

miR-148a

0.64 (0.42–0.98)

0.92 (0.7–1.22)

0.511

0.78 (0.62–0.97)

0.023

miR-579

0.57 (0.33–0.97)

0.89 (0.71–1.11)

0.511

0.82 (0.69–0.97)

0.023

miR-1291

0.58 (0.39–0.85)

0.90 (0.73–1.11)

0.511

0.81 (0.68–0.98)

0.027

miR-744*

0.58 (0.38–0.88)

0.89 (0.7–1.13)

0.511

0.82 (0.68–0.99)

0.036

miR-1244

0.64 (0.43–0.95)

0.90 (0.74–1.08)

0.511

0.84 (0.72–0.99)

0.042

miR-486-3p

1.57 (1.02–2.4)

1.12 (0.82–1.53)

0.723

1.28 (1.01–1.63)

0.043

miR-642

1.50 (1.03–2.09)

1.07 (0.88–1.32)

0.723

1.18 (1–1.38)

0.047

miR-340

0.65 (0.44–0.95)

0.93 (0.76–1.15)

0.598

0.87 (0.75–1)

0.057

miR-20a

0.65 (0.43–0.98)

1.02 (0.74–1.41)

0.896

0.87 (0.76–1.01)

0.059

miR-21

0.66 (0.44–0.98)

0.98 (0.76–1.26)

0.723

0.87 (0.74–1.01)

0.067

miR-34a

0.53 (0.31–0.91)

0.95 (0.76–1.2)

0.598

0.85 (0.68–1.05)

0.132

miR-590-3P

0.57 (0.36–0.91)

1.00 (0.87–1.15)

0.896

0.91 (0.81–1.04)

0.165

miR-204

1.57 (1.03–2.38)

0.89 (0.71–1.12)

0.857

1.07 (0.89–1.28)

0.477

miR-493

0.63 (0.39–0.99)

1.16 (0.97–1.39)

0.511

1.03 (0.89–1.2)

0.662

miR-483-5p

0.56 (0.33–0.93)

1.17 (0.98–1.4)

0.481

1 (0.86–1.16)

0.997

Discovery screening based on OR > 1.5 or OR < 0.67. Meta-analysis was conducted based on fixed effect model

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, FDR false discovery rate

miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 were the three most significant miRNAs among all 22 miRNAs from the discovery cohort and remained significant in the validation cohort and meta-analysis. Indeed, under the null hypothesis GSEA [17], miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 were significantly overrepresented and enriched among the top six genes on a global miRNA scale (Table 2, Additional file 1: Figure S4).
Table 2

Gene set enrichment analysis of 22 candidate miRNAs in whole miRNA set

MicroRNA

Rank in gene list

Enrichment score

Core enrichment

miR-424

0

0.654

Yes

miR-181a

1

0.560

Yes

miR-1291

2

0.545

Yes

miR-744*

3

0.545

Yes

miR-331

5

0.513

Yes

miR-92a

6

0.480

Yes

miR-1244

7

0.446

Yes

miR-486-3p

8

0.383

Yes

miR-493

11

0.328

Yes

miR-204

13

0.323

Yes

miR-34a

18

0.298

Yes

miR-642

21

0.282

Yes

miR-29b

22

0.281

Yes

miR-483-5p

24

0.278

Yes

miR-340

28

0.259

Yes

miR-148a

29

0.257

Yes

miR-590-3P

33

0.253

Yes

miR-1290

47

0.211

No

miR-21

52

0.203

No

miR-579

76

0.151

No

miR-20a

86

0.138

No

miR-155

211

0.051

No

Seventeen of them found to be significantly overrepresented (FDR q < 0.001) in ARDS vs at-risk control. miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 are among the top enrich score miRNAs

Sepsis and pneumonia stratification analysis

Sepsis and pneumonia are the two most common ARDS-predisposing clinical risks and account for the highest percentage of risk in our study cohort. Thus, stratification by sepsis and pneumonia can help validate biomarkers in different risk aspects [21]. According to the risk factor assessment from the validation cohort in Table 3, we selected six miRNAs that showed significant associations with ARDS and performed stratification analyses according to those with sepsis or pneumonia. Among patients with sepsis or pneumonia, miR-424, miR-92a, and miR-181a remained significantly associated with ARDS, reinforcing that the association was independent of sepsis or pneumonia.
Table 3

Stratification analysis of miRNA associations with ARDS in validation cohorts

Sepsis

  

miR-424

miR-92a

miR-181a

N

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

At-risk control

197

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

ARDS

112

0.78 (0.66–0.94)

0.007

1.75 (1.26–2.43)

< 0.001

1.76 (1.21–2.56)

0.003

Pneumonia

  

miR-424

miR-92a

miR-181a

N

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

At-risk control

114

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

ARDS

102

0.74 (0.6–0.92)

0.007

1.56 (1.05–2.32)

0.029

1.59 (1.03–2.46)

0.035

Stratify on sepsis or pneumonia only. All models were adjusted for age and gender

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

miRNA diagnostic performance

Including only ARDS patients from the validation cohort, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses for risk evaluation of ARDS with the LIPS model (AUC = 0.708; 95% CI 0.651–0.766), sepsis (AUC = 0.572; 95% CI 0.573–0.607), and pneumonia (AUC = 0.695; 95% CI 0.651–0.740). AUC values of miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 were larger than that of sepsis, but smaller than AUC values for LIPS or pneumonia. Importantly, specificity and accuracy of the three miRNAs were all larger than those from LIPS, sepsis, or pneumonia (Additional file 1: Table S4), suggesting that these miRNAs have better performance in correctly classifying at-risk controls.

Addition of any one of the three miRNAs significantly increased baseline LIPS AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (Table 4). When miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 were computed together with the baseline LIPS model, AUC significantly increased to 0.723 (95% CI 0.667–0.778; p = 0.005) (Table 4). Computation of all six miRNAs (miR-181a, miR-92a, miR-424, miR-1290, miR-29b, and miR-331) together with the baseline LIPS model further increased AUC to 0.728 (95% CI 0.674–0.783; p = 0.001) (Table 4). These observations suggest that measurement of three miRNAs (miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424) from whole blood greatly increased the risk evaluation of ARDS in this population, including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
Table 4

Diagnostic performance of sepsis/pneumonia model and miRNA combined model for ARDS

Combined cohort (N = 373)

ARDS vs. at-risk controls

AUC (95% CI)

Sensitivity, %

Specificity, %

Accuracy, %

IDI (95% CI)

p

Category-free NRI, % (95% CI)

p

LIPS model

0.708 (0.651–0.766)

64.35

50.81

56.85

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

miR-181a + LIPS

0.719 (0.661–0.776)

65.03

56.82

59.48

1.36 (0.14–2.58)

0.029

15.24 (−6.38–36.87)

0.649

miR-92a + LIPS

0.716 (0.659–0.773)

64.85

56.73

59.37

1.22 (0.09–2.35)

0.034

8.96 (−12.69–30.61)

0.418

miR-424 + LIPS

0.715 (0.659–0.771)

64.78

56.69

59.32

1.43 (0.12–2.74)

0.033

24.24 (2.71–45.76)

0.237

Extended model 1a

0.723 (0.667–0.778)

65.31

56.96

59.67

2.40 (0.72–4.08)

0.005

27.21 (5.72–48.70)

0.014

Extended model 2b

0.728 (0.674–0.783)

65.70

57.14

59.92

3.18 (1.28–5.09)

0.001

36.93 (15.58–58.28)

<0.001

AUC area under the curve, IDI integrated discrimination improvement, NRI net reclassification index, LIPS Lung Injury Prediction Score

aExtend model 1: LIPS + miR-181a + miR-92a + miR-424

bExtend model 2: LIPS + miR-181a + miR-92a + miR-424 + miR-1290 + miR-29b + miR-331

Relative IDI values for miR-181a, miR92a, and miR-424 were 1.36 (95% CI 0.14–2.58; p = 0.029), 1.22 (95% CI 0.09–2.35; p = 0.034), and 1.43 (95% CI 0.12–2.74; p = 0.033), respectively. Of note, combination of miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 increased IDI to 2.40 (95% CI 0.72–4.08; p = 0.005) and category-free NRI to 27.21% (95% CI 5.72–48.70; p = 0.014) (Table 4).

Discussion

ARDS is a life-threatening inflammatory disease of the lung. Although a mechanical ventilation strategy has been shown to influence mortality in this syndrome, there is currently no proven pharmacologic treatment despite more than 30 completed or ongoing clinical trials. The mortality rate of ARDS remains high [1, 22, 23]; therefore, early diagnosis and prevention are essential. The LIPS model has been used to detect potential risk factors for ARDS, using clinical predisposing conditions based on clinical observations. While this method is appropriately sensitive, it may not accurately reflect the pathophysiological process of ARDS [18].

To our knowledge, this study is the first to use whole blood samples from a large population of ARDS patients and critically ill, at-risk controls and to use a discovery and independent validation cohort study design with rigorous statistical analysis of a high-throughput miRNA set. The primary selected 22 miRNAs from the discovery cohort were further validated in an independent cohort and with subsequent meta-analysis. Such diligent analyses may offer an advantage for miRNA profiling and greatly reduce risk of misrepresentation from miRNA expression noise that typically results from additional serum or plasma isolation steps and sample contamination. Although patient collection spanned 10 years, we carefully selected high-quality samples and controlled all experiments by grouping patients into a randomly selected discovery cohort and a validation cohort according to dates of sample collection. We used identical amounts of RNA input in all experiments to control against bias caused by variation due to different RNA input amounts. We also distributed samples such that age, sex, case-control status, and RNA quality were balanced with respect to the day of purification and the day of analysis or plate number and randomized within each day and plate to reduce confounding factors from technical variation, such as plate-to-plate variation and purification differences.

miRNAs have been used successfully as biomarkers for chronic diseases, such as pancreatic and gastric cancers [9, 24]. This study identified three promising miRNAs—miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424—that are associated with human ARDS. GSEA confirmed that they were significantly overrepresented in ARDS cases compared to controls in these study cohorts, although there is no evidence directly linking these miRNAs to ARDS. However, multiple recent studies provide indirect evidence for the miRNAs’ involvement in dysregulated ARDS signaling pathways [2527].

Here, we report that miR-181a and miR-92a are associated with ARDS risk in all tested cohorts and meta-analysis. These findings are consistent with prior studies in inflammation and endothelial cell injury, which are common in ARDS [28]. miR-181a is a key regulator of T-cell development and T-cell receptor signaling threshold [25]. Increased miR-181a expression in mature T-cells augments cell sensitivity to peptide antigens. Further, T-cell responses decline with age due to an age-associated defect in T-cell receptor signaling, which is caused by increased expression of phosphatase 6 and miR-181a. The miR-181 family is also upregulated in asthma airway inflammation [29] and neutrophil regulation [30], which both play crucial roles in the pathophysiology of ARDS [2].

miR-92a inhibits endothelial cell angiogenesis and impairs endothelial cell function [26, 3133]. miR-92a also targets Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), KLF4, and sirtuin 1, thereby promoting inflammatory responses [26, 33, 34]. Further, lung microvascular endothelium injury-associated pulmonary edema is a hallmark of ARDS [35, 36]. When miR-92a is overexpressed, blood vessel growth and functional recovery of damaged tissue are restricted [31], which may enhance the incidence of pulmonary edema and ARDS.

In contrast, miR-424 was a protective factor for ARDS in our study (Table 1). miR-424 is downregulated in pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) via apelin and fibroblast growth factor 2 signaling in pulmonary artery endothelial cells [27]. PAH is commonly observed in ARDS patients, who can have hypoxemia that promotes pulmonary vasoconstriction to give rise to PAH. Hypoxia-induced miR-424 plays an important role in vascular remodeling and angiogenesis in endothelial cells [37]. Low oxygen levels affect cells and tissues during wound healing as well as during pathological conditions, such as stroke. As a consequence, miR-424 signaling is activated in endothelial cells to stabilize hypoxia-inducible factors [37]. These prior studies support our finding that miR-424 expression may exert a protective effect against ARDS.

Of note, sepsis and pneumonia had lower prevalence in at-risk controls than ARDS subjects in this population. Thus, we conducted stratification analysis to prove that the top three miRNAs (miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424) remained significantly associated with ARDS regardless of sepsis and pneumonia imbalance between our two cohorts. LIPS is currently considered a standard clinical prediction model and is associated with ARDS risk and complications [18]. A recent study evaluating LIPS on ARDS development showed LIPS has an AUC of 0.70 [38], which is consistent with our results [38]. All three miRNAs selected from our two cohorts had similar specificity and accuracy in predicting ARDS to that of LIPS. Further, incorporation of these miRNAs with LIPS further increased the potency and accuracy of ARDS risk estimate. Therefore, miRNAs identified from this study may have incremental utility to that of LIPS for future ARDS risk evaluation.

This study focused mainly on three miRNAs selected from the validation cohort. However, that does not mean that the remaining 19 miRNAs identified in the discovery cohort are irrelevant. Some of these miRNAs have been implicated in inflammatory signaling pathways and may also be ARDS candidate risk factors. For example, miR-155 and miR-21 are functionally related and contribute to NF-κB signaling [39], an important pathway for innate and adaptive immunity and inflammation. miR-155 is also upregulated in asthma, and the miR-29 family is upregulated in adult lungs. Further, miR-21 has been shown to play multiple roles in different pulmonary diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension, by targeting several immune receptors and cytokines, including IL-12 and SMAD7 [29]. Further investigation is needed to inform the involvement of these miRNAs in ARDS, which might provide a better understanding of mechanisms underlying the disease.

The miRNAs identified for ARDS risk were different from the ones we identified in previous prior study [11]. ARDS patients have a rapid change in the syndrome progress, from the initial pulmonary tissue damage and inflammation/infection to later wherein some of them developed MOF. And miRNAs are functional. This fact explains why miRNAs signal can be different under various disease biological conditions even with the same phenotype. The miRNAs we found in the other study were mainly associated with organ failure, whereas the miRNAs in current study were mainly associated with endothelial cell damage and inflammatory response.

However, we also acknowledge limitations of our study. First of all, our results were only based on 294 (out of 754) miRNAs that passed stringent QC criteria. It is possible that miRNAs did not pass QC are functionally related to ARDS. More studies, such as miRNA injection in ARDS mouse model, are needed to proof their functionality. The diagnostic power of our miRNAs might not be sufficiently strong. However, unlike other similar studies [8, 24], our control subjects were at-risk patients who share more features with ARDS cases, which may have reduced confounding variables compared to the use of healthy controls. In addition, ARDS is considered a complicated syndrome with multiple etiologies, so a single or a few miRNAs might not show strong signals for all ARDS patients. This concept was recently confirmed in an ARDS randomized clinical trial, which concluded that aspirin has no beneficial effect for ARDS prevention [40]. Aspirin has direct effect only on platelet function-related mechanistic pathways [41]. Although alteration in platelet function was found during ARDS development [42], it was not the only mechanistic pathway. Also, our study was based on a single geographic region—a geographically different, external cohort in a similar study setting would be helpful to further validate our findings. In this study, miRNA target gene expression data are not available. Future research on such targets will be informative for validating the functions of the identified miRNA in ARDS and provide more comprehensive understanding of mechanistic knowledge.

Conclusions

This study links whole blood expression of miR-181a, miR-92a, and miR-424 to ARDS. Inflammatory response markers miR-181a and miR-92a were significantly elevated in ARDS patients, while pulmonary artery endothelial cell anti-inflammation marker miR-424 was significantly reduced in ARDS patients. Further, expression patterns of our miRNA biomarkers may provide an in-depth molecular understanding of ARDS among at-risk patients beyond clinical factors, such as sepsis and pneumonia. In addition, combining these miRNA biomarkers with the LIPS model may further improve ARDS diagnosis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Xinghui Sun from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School for critical review of the manuscript; Andrea Shafer and Sean Levy from Massachusetts General Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for help searching for missing clinical data; and Dr. Boyu Ren from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health for assistance in data analysis. We also thank Dr. Sheila Cherry from Fresh Eyes Editing and Elizabeth A. Loehrer for editorial assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by grants R01 HL060710 (DCC), R56HL134356 (DCC), P P30 ES000002 (DCC), and HL123568 (GPS) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Authors’ contributions

ZZ, DCC, LL, AB, and QL designed the study. DCC, EB, BT, and LS established the MEARDS cohort and collected samples and clinical information. ZZ and LS performed experiments and data collection. ZZ, LL, RZ, WY, XZ, and YG performed data analysis. ZZ, GS, and XZ drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the final paper. DCC had full access to all data in the study and takes responsibility for integrity of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review boards of the MGH, BIDMC, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health approved this study.

Consent for publication

We confirm that we have obtained consent from participants (or legal parent/guardian for children) to report individual patient data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
(2)
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
(4)
Department of Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Modern Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University
(5)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital
(6)
Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
(7)
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School

References

  1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, DF MA, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A, Investigators LS, Group ET (2016) Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 315:788–800View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhu Z, Wang T, Liu Z, Yi L, Yang Z, Bian W, Chen W, Wang S, Li G, Li A, Martin GS, Zhu X (2017) Plasma neutrophil elastase and elafin as prognostic biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter survival and longitudinal prospective observation study. Shock 48(2):168–174View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramsey C, Kumar A (2011) H1N1: viral pneumonia as a cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care 17:64–71View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ware LB, Koyama T, Zhao Z, Janz DR, Wickersham N, Bernard GR, May AK, Calfee CS, Matthay MA (2013) Biomarkers of lung epithelial injury and inflammation distinguish severe sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 17:R253View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Rocco PR, Nieman GF (2016) ARDS: what experimental models have taught us. Intensive Care Med 42:806–810View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, Downing JR, Jacks T, Horvitz HR, Golub TR (2005) MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435:834–838View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Necela BM, Carr JM, Asmann YW, Thompson EA (2011) Differential expression of microRNAs in tumors from chronically inflamed or genetic (APC(Min/+)) models of colon cancer. PLoS One 6:e18501View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Schultz NA, Dehlendorff C, Jensen BV, Bjerregaard JK, Nielsen KR, Bojesen SE, Calatayud D, Nielsen SE, Yilmaz M, Hollander NH, Andersen KK, Johansen JS (2014) MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 311:392–404View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin XJ, Chong Y, Guo ZW, Xie C, Yang XJ, Zhang Q, Li SP, Xiong Y, Yuan Y, Min J, Jia WH, Jie Y, Chen MS, Chen MX, Fang JH, Zeng C, Zhang Y, Guo RP, Wu Y, Lin G, Zheng L, Zhuang SM (2015) A serum microRNA classifier for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, retrospective, longitudinal biomarker identification study with a nested case-control study. The Lancet Oncology 16:804–815View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang C, Xiao X, Chintagari NR, Breshears M, Wang Y, Liu L (2014) MicroRNA and mRNA expression profiling in rat acute respiratory distress syndrome. BMC Med Genet 7:46Google Scholar
  11. Zhu Z, Zhang R, Liang L, Su L, Lu Q, Baccarelli AA, Bajwa EK, Thompson BT, Christiani DC (2016) Whole blood microRNAs as a prognostic classifier for acute respiratory distress syndrome 28-day mortality. Intensive Care Med 42(11):1824–1825View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Patnaik SK, Yendamuri S, Kannisto E, Kucharczuk JC, Singhal S, Vachani A (2012) MicroRNA expression profiles of whole blood in lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 7:e46045View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong MN, Thompson BT, Williams P, Pothier L, Boyce PD, Christiani DC (2005) Clinical predictors of and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: potential role of red cell transfusion. Crit Care Med 33:1191–1198View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang R, Wang Z, Tejera P, Frank AJ, Wei Y, Su L, Zhu Z, Guo Y, Chen F, Bajwa EK, Thompson BT, Christiani DC (2017) Late-onset moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with shorter survival and higher mortality: a two-stage association study. Intensive Care Med 43:399–407View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 307:2526–2533Google Scholar
  16. Mraz M, Malinova K, Mayer J, Pospisilova S (2009) MicroRNA isolation and stability in stored RNA samples. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 390:1–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15545–15550View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gajic O, Dabbagh O, Park PK, Adesanya A, Chang SY, Hou P, Anderson H 3rd, Hoth JJ, Mikkelsen ME, Gentile NT, Gong MN, Talmor D, Bajwa E, Watkins TR, Festic E, Yilmaz M, Iscimen R, Kaufman DA, Esper AM, Sadikot R, Douglas I, Sevransky J, Malinchoc M, Illness USC, Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention Study I (2011) Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:462–470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172 discussion 207-112View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rieu I, Powers SJ (2009) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR: design, calculations, and statistics. Plant Cell 21:1031–1033View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ware LB, Calfee CS (2016) Biomarkers of ARDS: what’s new? Intensive Care Med 42:797–799View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gong MN, Thompson BT (2016) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: shifting the emphasis from treatment to prevention. Curr Opin Crit Care 22:21–37View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Beitler JR, Schoenfeld DA, Thompson BT (2014) Preventing ARDS: progress, promise, and pitfalls. Chest 146:1102–1113View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu C, Ren C, Han J, Ding Y, Du J, Dai N, Dai J, Ma H, Hu Z, Shen H, Xu Y, Jin G (2014) A five-microRNA panel in plasma was identified as potential biomarker for early detection of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 110:2291–2299View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Li QJ, Chau J, Ebert PJ, Sylvester G, Min H, Liu G, Braich R, Manoharan M, Soutschek J, Skare P, Klein LO, Davis MM, Chen CZ (2007) miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell 129:147–161View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Loyer X, Potteaux S, Vion AC, Guerin CL, Boulkroun S, Rautou PE, Ramkhelawon B, Esposito B, Dalloz M, Paul JL, Julia P, Maccario J, Boulanger CM, Mallat Z, Tedgui A (2014) Inhibition of microRNA-92a prevents endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis in mice. Circ Res 114:434–443View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim J, Kang Y, Kojima Y, Lighthouse JK, Hu X, Aldred MA, McLean DL, Park H, Comhair SA, Greif DM, Erzurum SC, Chun HJ (2013) An endothelial apelin-FGF link mediated by miR-424 and miR-503 is disrupted in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Med 19:74–82View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moussa MD, Santonocito C, Fagnoul D, Donadello K, Pradier O, Gaussem P, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2015) Evaluation of endothelial damage in sepsis-related ARDS using circulating endothelial cells. Intensive Care Med 41:231–238View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sessa R, Hata A (2013) Role of microRNAs in lung development and pulmonary diseases. Pulmonary circulation 3:315–328View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ward JR, Heath PR, Catto JW, Whyte MK, Milo M, Renshaw SA (2011) Regulation of neutrophil senescence by microRNAs. PLoS One 6:e15810View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Bonauer A, Carmona G, Iwasaki M, Mione M, Koyanagi M, Fischer A, Burchfield J, Fox H, Doebele C, Ohtani K, Chavakis E, Potente M, Tjwa M, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S (2009) MicroRNA-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice. Science 324:1710–1713View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu C, Gong Y, Yuan J, Zhang W, Zhao G, Li H, Sun A, KaiHu ZY, Ge J (2012) microRNA-181a represses ox-LDL-stimulated inflammatory response in dendritic cell by targeting c-Fos. J Lipid Res 53:2355–2363View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fang Y, Davies PF (2012) Site-specific microRNA-92a regulation of Kruppel-like factors 4 and 2 in atherosusceptible endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32:979–987View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu W, Xiao H, Laguna-Fernandez A, Villarreal G Jr, Wang KC, Geary GG, Zhang Y, Wang WC, Huang HD, Zhou J, Li YS, Chien S, Garcia-Cardena G, Shyy JY (2011) Flow-dependent regulation of Kruppel-like factor 2 is mediated by microRNA-92a. Circulation 124:633–641View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maniatis NA, Orfanos SE (2008) The endothelium in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care 14:22–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ware LB (2006) Pathophysiology of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine 27:337–349View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghosh G, Subramanian IV, Adhikari N, Zhang X, Joshi HP, Basi D, Chandrashekhar YS, Hall JL, Roy S, Zeng Y, Ramakrishnan S (2010) Hypoxia-induced microRNA-424 expression in human endothelial cells regulates HIF-alpha isoforms and promotes angiogenesis. J Clin Invest 120:4141–4154View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Soto GJ, Kor DJ, Park PK, Hou PC, Kaufman DA, Kim M, Yadav H, Teman N, Hsu MC, Shvilkina T, Grewal Y, De Aguirre M, Gunda S, Gajic O, Gong MN (2016) Lung injury prediction score in hospitalized patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 44:2182–2191View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma X, Becker Buscaglia LE, Barker JR, Li Y (2011) MicroRNAs in NF-kappaB signaling. J Mol Cell Biol 3:159–166View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kor DJ, Carter RE, Park PK, Festic E, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Hinds R, Talmor D, Gajic O, Ware LB, Gong MN, Illness USC, Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention with Aspirin Study G (2016) Effect of aspirin on development of ARDS in at-risk patients presenting to the emergency department: the LIPS-A randomized clinical trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 315(22):2406–2414View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Looney MR, Nguyen JX, Hu Y, Van Ziffle JA, Lowell CA, Matthay MA (2009) Platelet depletion and aspirin treatment protect mice in a two-event model of transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 119:3450–3461PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Yadav H, Kor DJ (2015) Platelets in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309:L915–L923View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017