Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Bradykinin receptor deficiency or antagonism do not impact the host response during gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis

  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2, 3Email author
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental20197:14

  • Received: 14 January 2019
  • Accepted: 27 February 2019
  • Published:



Kinins are short peptides with a wide range of proinflammatory properties that are generated from kininogens in the so-called kallikrein-kinin system. Kinins exert their biological activities through stimulation of two distinct receptor subtypes, the kinin or bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors (B1R, B2R). Acute challenge models have implicated B1R and B2R in the pathogenesis of sepsis. However, their role in the host response during sepsis originating from the lung is not known.


To determine the role of B1R and B2R in pneumonia-derived sepsis, B1R/B2R-deficient mice and wild-type mice treated with the B1R antagonist R-715 or the B2R antagonist HOE-140 were studied after infection with the common gram-negative pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae via the airways. Neither B1R/B2R deficiency nor B1R or B2R inhibition influenced bacterial growth at the primary site of infection or dissemination to distant body sites. In addition, B1R/B2R deficiency or inhibition did not impact local or systemic inflammatory responses during Klebsiella induced pneumosepsis.


These data argue against an important role for kinins in the host response to pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by a clinically relevant pathogen.


  • Bradykinin
  • Pneumonia
  • Sepsis
  • Inflammation


Bradykinin and kallidin, collectively referred to as kinins, are short peptides that have a wide range of proinflammatory effects that include hypotension, vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, edema, and induction of cell recruitment and cytokine/chemokine production [1, 2]. Kinins are released by cleavage of high molecular weight kininogens (HMWK) by plasma kallikrein (PK), and by cleavage of low molecular weight kininogen by tissue kallikrein; hence the name kallikrein-kinin system (KKS). They exert their biological activities through stimulation of two distinct receptor subtypes, the kinin or bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors (B1R, B2R) [1, 2]. While the B2 receptor is expressed constitutively in many tissues, the B1 receptor is upregulated upon stimulation of cells by inflammatory, injurious, or bacterial triggers. Kinins are end-products of the contact system, which apart from PK and HMWK is composed of coagulation factors XI (FXI) and FXII [2, 3].

Sepsis is a complex syndrome characterized by organ failure resulting from a harmful dysbalanced host response that entails both hyperinflammation and immune suppression [4, 5]. Several studies have implicated the KKS in the pathogenesis of sepsis [3, 6]. Mice deficient in B1R or both B1R and B2R were protected against hypotension induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [7]. Pharmacological blockade of B1R prevented hemodynamic derangement, attenuated systemic inflammation, and improved survival during polymicrobial sepsis in rats [8, 9]. B2R inhibition reversed LPS-induced shock in rats [10], and mitigated hypotension and acute lung injury in pigs infused with Pseudomonas [11, 12], although other studies could not confirm beneficial effects of B2R antagonism in experimental sepsis [13, 14]. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of the B2R antagonist deltibant did not improve 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock, although the drug did reduce mortality among patients with pure gram-negative infection after severity adjustment [15]. It should be noted that KKS activation could also improve defense against bacteria by releasing antimicrobial peptides and enhancing innate immunity [16, 17]. Indeed, B2R-deficient mice showed increased bacterial burdens and accelerated weight loss after infection with Listeria [18].

The present study aimed to investigate the role of kinins during the host response to pneumonia-derived sepsis. To this end, we investigated bradykinin B1/B2 receptor (B1R/B2R)-deficient mice and wild-type mice treated with bradykinin receptor antagonists in an established model of respiratory tract infection with the common gram-negative pathogen Klebsiella (K.) pneumoniae resulting in a gradually growing bacterial load in the lungs with subsequent dissemination to distant body sites and sepsis.



Male C57Bl/6J wild-type mice (7–8-week-old) were purchased from Charles River (Maastricht, the Netherlands). Homozygous B1R/B2R double gene knockout mice (Bdkrb1/Bdkrb2−/−) with a C57Bl/6J genetic background were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Academic Medical Center.

Experimental design

Mice were infected with viable K. pneumoniae (serotype 2, ATCC 43816; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) by intranasal administration (~ 7000 CFU in 50 μL isotonic saline) as described [1921]. For selective inhibition of B1R or B2R, mice were treated with R-715 (a selective B1R antagonist; Sigma Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, the Netherlands) or HOE-140 (a selective B2R antagonist [22]; Sigma Aldrich), both by intraperitoneal injection. R-715 was administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg at t = 0 and t = 24 h. HOE-140 was administered at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg at t = 0, 12, and 24 h. In all experiments, control mice received vehicle only (phosphate-buffered saline). Treatment schedules and doses were based on previous studies in which the respective interventions modified a variety of inflammatory responses in different models for R-715 [2325] and HOE-140 [2628]. Mice were euthanized at 12 or 36 (or 40) hours for collection of blood and tissue samples as described [1921]. Sample processing and bacterial quantification were done as described [1921]. Each group consisted of eight mice for each time point.


Cytokines, chemokines and myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble E-selectin, and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in the lung were measured by ELISA according the instructions of the manufacturer (Duoset; R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK).

Plasma cytokines and chemokines were determined using a cytometric beads array multiplex assay (BD biosciences, San Jose, CA).


Paraffin-embedded lung was cut into 4-μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Slides were coded and scored by a pathologist blinded for group identity as described [19]. To determine neutrophil influx in the lung, sections were stained with anti-mouse Ly6G mAb (BD Biosciences) as previously described [29]. Slides were scanned using an Olympus dotSlide scanner (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to generate TIFF images of the full tissue section. Ly-6G positivity was measured using ImageJ; the amount of positivity was expressed as percentage of the total lung surface area [29].

Statistical analysis

Data are provided as medians with interquartile ranges, as specified in the figure legends. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for comparisons between groups. Kruskal-Wallis test, where appropriate followed by Mann-Whitney U test, was used for groups of three or more. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 5.


B1R/B2R-deficient mice show unaltered antibacterial and host inflammatory responses

To determine the role of B1R/B2R in the host response during gram-negative pneumosepsis, we infected B1R/B2R-deficient mice and wild-type controls with the human sepsis pathogen K. pneumoniae via the airways. At 12 h after infection, bacteria were still confined to the lungs, with no differences between mouse strains (Fig. 1). At 36 h, the infection had disseminated to distant body sites, with positive cultures of blood, spleen, and liver; bacterial loads were similar in B1R/B2R-deficient and control mice in all organs examined (Fig. 1). To study the influence of B1R/B2R on the inflammatory response at the primary site of infection, we measured cytokine (tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6) and chemokine (CXCL1, CXCL2, and CCL2) levels in whole lung homogenates (Fig. 2). No differences between B1R/B2R-deficient and control mice were detected with the exception of modestly higher lung IL-6 levels in B1R/B2R-deficient mice at 12 h. Considering the potential role of bradykinin in leukocyte recruitment [1, 2], we determined lung MPO levels as a measure of neutrophil content in lung tissue; B1R/B2R-deficient mice had modestly elevated lung MPO levels at 12 h (P < 0.05 versus control mice), but not at 36 h (Fig. 3). B1R/B2R-deficient mice also tended to have more Ly6-G positive cells (indicating neutrophils) in lung tissue at 12 h post infection (Fig. 3). Lung pathology did not differ between groups (data not shown, see Additional file 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Deficiency of BK receptors does not influence K. pneumoniae outgrowth or dissemination during pneumonia-derived sepsis. Bacterial burdens [colony-forming units (CFUs)] in the lung (at 12 h and 36 h), blood, spleen, and liver at 36 h after infection in wild-type (WT) mice and mice with genetic deficiency of B1RB2R (Bdkrb1/b2−/−). Cultures of blood, spleen, and liver were negative at 12 h post infection. Data are depicted as box-and-whisker diagrams (10-Log) of eight mice per group at each time point. Differences between groups were not significant (Mann-Whitney U test)

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Lung cytokine and chemokine levels during pneumonia-derived sepsis in mice with or without B1RB2R deficiency. Indicated mediators were measured in whole lung homogenates obtained 12 or 36 h after infection from wild-type (WT) mice and mice with genetic deficiency of B1RB2R (Bdkrb1/b2−/−). Data are depicted as box-and-whisker diagrams of eight mice per group at each time point. *P < 0.05 vs WT

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Lung myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels and Ly6-G positive cells in lung tissue during pneumonia in mice with or without B1RB2R deficiency. a MPO was measured in whole lung homogenates (12 and 36 h after infection) from wild-type (WT) mice and mice with genetic deficiency of B1RB2R (Bdkrb1/b2−/−). b Ly6-G positivity of lung tissue was determined by image analysis (12 h after infection). Bar graphs are depicted as box-and-whisker diagrams of eight mice per group at each time point. Lower panel (c) shows representative pictures of Ly6G staining of lung tissue (12 h after infection; original magnification × 4). *P < 0.05 versus WT

To evaluate a possible role of B1R/B2R signaling in systemic inflammatory responses, we measured plasma cytokine levels, as well as markers for endothelial cell activation (soluble E-selectin and soluble VCAM-1). None of these parameters were different between B1R/B2R-deficient and control mice (Table 1).
Table 1

Plasma concentrations of cytokines and endothelial cell activation markers in wild-type and Bdkrb1/b2−/− mice


T = 12 h

T = 36 h








64 (22–128)

16 (3–77)


17 (7–28)

30 (22–42)

252 (118–371)

137 (37–419)




3 (2–7)

2 (1–10)




46 (36–235)

34 (11–53)

Soluble E-selectin (ng/ml)

40 (34–50)

37 (15–59)

284 (142–351)

129 (116–145)

Soluble VCAM-1 (ng/ml)

1382 (936–1679)

1283 (484–1477)

3526 (2996–4007)

3158 (1619–3582)

Data are median with interquartile ranges of eight mice per group at each time point. ND not detectable

Selective inhibition of B1R or B2R does not impact antibacterial defense or inflammatory responses

To determine potential individual roles for B1R and B2R in the host response to gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis, mice were infected with Klebsiella via the airways and treated with R-715 (a specific B1R antagonist [2325]) or HOE-140 (a specific B2R antagonist) [2628]. Bacterial burdens in lungs, blood, spleen, and liver were not different between treatment groups at 40 h after infection (Fig. 4). Likewise, neither R-715 nor HOE-140 influenced lung cytokine, chemokine, or MPO levels except for lower IL-1β levels in HOE-140-treated mice as compared to R-715-treated animals (Fig. 5). Similarly, systemic inflammatory responses (plasma cytokine, soluble E-selectin, and soluble VCAM-1 concentrations) did not differ between treatment groups except for higher soluble E-selectin levels in R-715 treated mice (Table 2).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Inhibition of B1 or B2 receptors does not influence K. pneumoniae outgrowth or dissemination during pneumonia-derived sepsis. Bacterial loads (CFUs) in the lung, blood, liver, and spleen at 40 h after infection in mice injected intraperitoneally with vehicle, the B1 receptor antagonist R-715, or the B2 receptor antagonist HOE-140. Data are depicted as box-and-whisker diagrams (10-Log) of eight mice per group at each time point. Differences between groups were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test)

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Lung cytokine and chemokine levels during pneumonia-derived sepsis in mice treated with a B1R or B2R antagonist. Indicated mediators were measured in whole lung homogenates obtained 40 h after infection from mice injected intraperitoneally with vehicle, the B1 receptor antagonist R-715, or the B2 receptor antagonist HOE-140. Data are depicted as box-and-whisker diagrams of eight mice per group at each time point. Statistical analysis was done by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate; **P < 0.01

Table 2

Plasma concentrations of cytokines and endothelial cell activation markers treated with the B1R antagonist R-715 or the B2R antagonist HOE-140






5 (2–8)

7 (2–17)

4 (2–9)


138 (66–374)

209 (53–626)

174 (77–272)


3 (2–5)

4 (2–6)

2 (1–5)


64 (19–172)

110 (23–207)

97 (34–138)

Soluble E-selectin (ng/ml)

30 (23–37)

47 (37–55)**

40 (30–49)

Soluble VCAM-1 (ng/ml)

2202 (1358–2616)

2497 (1899–3554)

2365 (2096–2843)

Data are medians with interquartile ranges of eight mice per group at 40 h after infection. **P < 0.005 vs vehicle control


The present study investigated the role of kinins during pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by K. pneumoniae. Our group recently reported that FXII deficiency improves host defense in this pneumosepsis model through an FXI independent mechanism [20]. Besides activating the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation system through activation of FXI, activated FXII can activate PK which can liberate bradykinin from HMWK [2, 30]. Considering that FXI did not contribute to the detrimental role of FXII in gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis [20], we hypothesized that FXII may exert its effect by activating KKS and releasing kinins. However, by using a combination of genetically modified mice with combined B1R and B2R deficiency and pharmacological interventions specifically targeting B1R or B2R, we showed that neither B1R nor B2R modulates bacterial growth or local and systemic inflammatory responses, suggesting a nonessential role of kinins in the host response during gram-negative pneumosepsis. While these findings corroborate our earlier results in kininogen-deficient or inhibited mice [21], they may be considered remarkable in light of the broad array of inflammatory properties ascribed to bradykinin [1, 2, 31]. Together, these data suggest that neither kinins nor kininogens contribute to the host response during gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis, and that pathways different from the KKS mediate the harmful effect of FXII herein.

Earlier investigations have implicated the KKS in inflammatory responses during sepsis [3, 31]. Kinins are chemotactic and augment the migration of neutrophils [32, 33], and bradykinin stimulates alveolar macrophages to secrete neutrophil chemotactic substances [34]. Bradykinin can further augment inflammation by inducing neutrophil degranulation [35]. In addition, bradykinin can increase vascular permeability, a hallmark feature of sepsis [36]. In accordance, inhibition of B1R during polymicrobial abdominal sepsis resulted in a wide range of anti-inflammatory effects including reduced neutrophil infiltration, attenuated cytokine release, diminished intestinal mucosal permeability, and reduced organ injury [8, 9]. Moreover, B1R inhibition diminished lung injury induced by direct intratracheal injection of LPS in rats as indicated by reduced local proinflammatory cytokine production, attenuated leukocyte influx, and lower lung vascular permeability [8]. B2R inhibition modestly attenuated TNFα and IL-1β release during Neisseria sepsis in pigs without influencing vascular leakage or neutrophil responses [14]. Despite the evidence for involvement of kinins in inflammatory responses in experimental sepsis, we were unable to show a role for bradykinin receptors in our model of gram-negative pneumosepsis. Notably, our sepsis model differs from previous investigations that studied the role of KKS in sepsis in that it entails a gradually evolving infection, initiated by administration of a relatively low bacterial dose via the airways and eventually resulting in sepsis. Systemic administration of LPS or bacteria, as well as induction of abdominal sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture, results in a more fulminant course with brisk induction of inflammatory pathways. Indeed, the roles of specific inflammatory pathways vary between different experimental sepsis models [37, 38], which is important to consider for identifying therapeutic targets.

Our study is limited by the fact that we did not measure blood pressure or other cardiovascular readouts. Therefore, our investigation does not exclude a possible role for B1R and/or B2R in the hemodynamic response during gram-negative pneumosepsis. Previous studies documented variable roles for B1R and B2R in cardiovascular changes during experimental sepsis. In a model of polymicrobial abdominal sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture, pharmacological inhibition of B1R prevented hemodynamic derangement and improved survival [9]. In accordance, broad transgenic overexpression of B1R in mice resulted in enhanced lethality upon administration of LPS [39] and transgenic overexpression of B1R in endothelial cells in rats caused increased susceptibility for hypotension upon LPS challenge [40]. In agreement, B1R/B2R-deficient mice did not develop hypotension after LPS administration; B1R-deficient mice showed an attenuated response to LPS, while B2R-deficient mice were not protected [7]. Accordingly, B2R blockade did not reverse hypotension during gram-negative sepsis in pigs [14]. While these studies point at a dominant role for B1R in cardiovascular function in sepsis, other investigations have also implicated B2R herein [10, 13]. Altogether, preclinical studies have clearly implicated kinins and bradykinin receptors in sepsis-induced hypotension. The present investigation did not include mice with selective B1R or B2R deficiency, which could have provided important additional information. In addition, although R-715 (a specific B1R antagonist [2325]) and HOE-140 (a specific B2R antagonist) [2628] have been used successfully in earlier studies at the dose regimens also implemented in the current study, we here provide no conclusive proof that effective and selective inhibition of B1R and B2R was accomplished. We did not study the impact of kinins and bradykinin receptors on mortality in our model. Survival studies are highly restricted in our country and the likelihood that mortality was different between groups is low considering the absence of differences in host response readouts.


The KKS can mediate a variety of inflammatory and vascular reactions and its role in hypotension during fulminant experimental sepsis has been well established. The data reported here, generated by using two different approaches—genetic deficiency of B1R/B2R and pharmacological inhibition of B1R or B2R—argue against an important role for kinins in the host response to pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by a clinically relevant pathogen. Further studies using mice with selective B1R or B2R deficiency are warranted to increase our knowledge on the role of the KKS in pneumosepsis. These results contribute to the understanding of the complex and heterogeneous host response during sepsis.



Bradykinin B1/B2 receptor

Bdkrb1/b2 −/−

B1R/B2R double gene knockout mice


C-C motif chemokine ligand 2


C-X-C motif ligand 1


Factor XI


Factor XII


High molecular weight kininogen


B2R antagonist




Kallikrein-kinin system






Plasma kallikrein


B1R antagonist


Tumor necrosis factor-α


Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1



We appreciate the essential assistance from Joost Daalhuisen and Marieke ten Brink.


Chao Ding was supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

CD performed all experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JY and CvtV performed part of the analyses and contributed to the interpretation of the data. TvdP supervised the project and completed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Center of Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Room G2-130, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands


  1. Marceau F, Regoli D (2004) Bradykinin receptor ligands: therapeutic perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:845–852View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Schmaier AH (2016) The contact activation and kallikrein/kinin systems: pathophysiologic and physiologic activities. J Thromb Haemost 14:28–39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nicola H (2017) The role of contact system in septic shock: the next target? An overview of the current evidence. J Intensive Care 5:31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Delano MJ, Ward PA (2016) The immune system’s role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome. Immunol Rev 274:330–353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG (2017) The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol 17:407–420View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Frick IM, Bjorck L, Herwald H (2007) The dual role of the contact system in bacterial infectious disease. Thromb Hemost 98:497-502Google Scholar
  7. Cayla C, Todiras M, Iliescu R, Saul VV, Gross V, Pilz B, Chai G, Merino VF, Pesquero JB, Baltatu OC, Bader M (2007) Mice deficient for both kinin receptors are normotensive and protected from endotoxin-induced hypotension. FASEB J 21:1689–1698View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nasseri S, Gurusamy M, Jung B, Lee D, Khang G, Doods H, Wu D (2015) Kinin B1 receptor antagonist BI113823 reduces acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 43:e499–e507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Murugesan P, Jung B, Lee D, Khang G, Doods H, Wu D (2016) Kinin B1 receptor inhibition with BI113823 reduces inflammatory response, mitigates organ injury, and improves survival among rats with severe Sepsis. J Infect Dis 213:532–540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Whalley ET, Solomon JA, Modafferi DM, Bonham KA, Cheronis JC (1992) CP-0127, a novel potent bradykinin antagonist, increases survival in rat and rabbit models of endotoxin shock. Agents Actions Suppl 38(Pt 3):413–420Google Scholar
  11. Ridings PC, Blocher CR, Fisher BJ, Fowler AA 3rd, Sugerman HJ (1995) Beneficial effects of a bradykinin antagonist in a model of gram-negative sepsis. J Trauma 39:81–88 discussion 8-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ridings PC, Sugerman HJ, Blocher CR, Fisher BJ, Fowler AA (1995) Hemodynamic effects of bradykinin antagonism in porcine gram-negative sepsis. J Investig Surg 8:115–122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Feletou M, Jamonneau I, Germain M, Thurieau C, Fauchere JL, Villa P, Ghezzi P, Canet E (1996) Bradykinin B2 receptor involvement in rabbit and murine models of septic shock. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 27:500–507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Barratt-Due A, Johansen HT, Sokolov A, Thorgersen EB, Hellerud BC, Reubsaet JL, Seip KF, Tonnessen TI, Lindstad JK, Pharo A, Castellheim A, Mollnes TE, Nielsen EW (2011) The role of bradykinin and the effect of the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant in porcine sepsis. Shock 36:517–523View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fein AM, Bernard GR, Criner GJ, Fletcher EC, Good JT, Knaus WA, Levy H, Matuschak GM, Shanies HM, Taylor RW, Rodell TC (1997) Treatment of severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis with a novel bradykinin antagonist, deltibant (CP-0127)—results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 277:482–487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Nordahl EA, Rydengard V, Morgelin M, Schmidtchen A (2005) Domain 5 of high molecular weight kininogen is antibacterial. J Biol Chem 280:34832–34839View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Frick IM, Akesson P, Herwald H, Morgelin M, Malmsten M, Nagler DK, Bjorck L (2006) The contact system—a novel branch of innate immunity generating antibacterial peptides. EMBO J 25:5569–5578View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaman WE, Wolterink AF, Bader M, Boele LC, van der Kleij D (2009) The bradykinin B2 receptor in the early immune response against Listeria infection. Med Microbiol Immunol 198:39–46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Achouiti A, Vogl T, Urban CF, Rohm M, Hommes TJ, van Zoelen MA, Florquin S, Roth J, van't Veer C, de Vos AF, van der Poll T (2012) Myeloid-related protein-14 contributes to protective immunity in gram-negative pneumonia derived sepsis. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Stroo I, Zeerleder S, Ding C, Luken BM, Roelofs Jjth, de Boer OJ, Meijers JCM, Castellino FJ, van 't Veer C, van der Poll T (2017) Coagulation factor XI improves host defence during murine pneumonia-derived sepsis independent of factor XII activation. Thromb Haemost 117:1601-14Google Scholar
  21. Ding C, van't Veer C, Jjth R, Shukla M, McCrae KR, Revenko AS, Crosby J, van der Poll T (2018) Limited role of kininogen in the host response during gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys 314:L397–l405Google Scholar
  22. Nsa Allogho S, Gobeil F, Pheng LH, Nguyen-Le XK, Neugebauer W, Regoli D (1997) Antagonists for kinin B1 and B2 receptors in the mouse. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 75:558–562View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Schulze-Topphoff U, Prat A, Prozorovski T, Siffrin V, Paterka M, Herz J, Bendix I, Ifergan I, Schadock I, Mori MA, Van Horssen J, Schroter F, Smorodchenko A, Han MH, Bader M, Steinman L, Aktas O, Zipp F (2009) Activation of kinin receptor B1 limits encephalitogenic T lymphocyte recruitment to the central nervous system. Nat Med 15:788–793View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Viana AF, Maciel IS, Dornelles FN, Figueiredo CP, Siqueira JM, Campos MM, Calixto JB (2010) Kinin B1 receptors mediate depression-like behavior response in stressed mice treated with systemic E. coli lipopolysaccharide. J Neuroinflammation 7:98View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Uzawa A, Mori M, Taniguchi J, Kuwabara S (2014) Modulation of the kallikrein/kinin system by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alleviates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Exp Immunol 178:245–252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Austinat M, Braeuninger S, Pesquero JB, Brede M, Bader M, Stoll G, Renne T, Kleinschnitz C (2009) Blockade of bradykinin receptor B1 but not bradykinin receptor B2 provides protection from cerebral infarction and brain edema * expanded materials and methods. Stroke 40:285–293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dutra RC, Leite DF, Bento AF, Manjavachi MN, Patricio ES, Figueiredo CP, Pesquero JB, Calixto JB (2011) The role of kinin receptors in preventing neuroinflammation and its clinical severity during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. PLoS One 6:e27875View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcon R, Claudino RF, Dutra RC, Bento AF, Schmidt EC, Bouzon ZL, Sordi R, Morais RL, Pesquero JB, Calixto JB (2013) Exacerbation of DSS-induced colitis in mice lacking kinin B(1) receptors through compensatory up-regulation of kinin B(2) receptors: the role of tight junctions and intestinal homeostasis. Br J Pharmacol 168:389–402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. de Stoppelaar SF, van't Veer C, Claushuis TAM, Albersen BJA, Jjth R, van der Poll T (2014) Thrombocytopenia impairs host defense in gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis in mice. Blood 124:3781–3790View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Long AT, Kenne E, Jung R, Fuchs TA, Renne T (2016) Contact system revisited: an interface between inflammation, coagulation, and innate immunity. J Thromb Haemost 14:427–437View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Qadri F, Bader M (2018) Kinin B1 receptors as a therapeutic target for inflammation. Expert Opin Ther Targets 22:31–44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Paegelow I, Trzeczak S, Bockmann S, Vietinghoff G (2002) Migratory responses of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to kinin peptides. Pharmacology 66:153–161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Stuardo M, Gonzalez CB, Nualart F, Boric M, Corthorn J, Bhoola KD, Figueroa CD (2004) Stimulated human neutrophils form biologically active kinin peptides from high and low molecular weight kininogens. J Leukoc Biol 75:631–640View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sato E, Koyama S, Nomura H, Kubo K, Sekiguchi M (1996) Bradykinin stimulates alveolar macrophages to release neutrophil, monocyte, and eosinophil chemotactic activity. J Immunol 157:3122–3129Google Scholar
  35. Ehrenfeld P, Matus CE, Pavicic F, Toledo C, Nualart F, Gonzalez CB, Burgos RA, Bhoola KD, Figueroa CD (2009) Kinin B1 receptor activation turns on exocytosis of matrix metalloprotease-9 and myeloperoxidase in human neutrophils: involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase family. J Leukoc Biol 86:1179–1189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Opal SM, van der Poll T (2015) Endothelial barrier dysfunction in septic shock. J Intern Med 277:277–293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Marshall JC, Deitch E, Moldawer LL, Opal S, Redl H, van der Poll T (2005) Preclinical models of shock and sepsis: what can they tell us? Shock 24(Suppl 1):1–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cohen J, Vincent JL, Adhikari NK, Machado FR, Angus DC, Calandra T, Jaton K, Giulieri S, Delaloye J, Opal S, Tracey K, van der Poll T, Pelfrene E (2015) Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect Dis 15:581–614View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ni A, Yin H, Agata J, Yang Z, Chao L, Chao J (2003) Overexpression of kinin B1 receptors induces hypertensive response to des-Arg9-bradykinin and susceptibility to inflammation. J Biol Chem 278:219–225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Merino VF, Todiras M, Campos LA, Saul V, Popova E, Baltatu OC, Pesquero JB, Bader M (2008) Increased susceptibility to endotoxic shock in transgenic rats with endothelial overexpression of kinin B(1) receptors. J Mol Med (Berl) 86:791–798View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019